@zeik said:
If the new console has new hardware that means you do have to buy the console if you want to play any game that utilizes that new hardware. They'd either have to make the revisions incredibly incremental and effectively unnecessary, so that it doesn't instantly make the previous hardware obsolete, or make legitimate hardware changes that screw over everyone that bought a version of the console with weaker hardware. This would mean developers would most likely make all their games for the weakest console, because that's the only way they could actually sell the game to everyone, not just the people with the newest version of the console.
One of the big draws of consoles over the PC is that once you buy a console you can expect to be able to play every game released for that console, regardless of when it's released. Once you start locking people out of being able to play new games based on which version of the console you have there's little advantage to it over a PC, which are fully customizable and don't require you to go out and buy a brand new one every time some better hardware comes out.
Besides, a year is way too quick of a turnaround for this kind of hardware. You'd pretty much have to be working on the next revision as soon as the last one was out.
The big problem I have with your stance is that it relies on a reality where games will not work with older hardware. There is zero evidence to support that idea and there is evidence that points to the contrary. Look at IOS as an example of a platform that gets upgraded every year (A person can also say that Microsoft has been chasing Apple for the past couple of years) and you will see was suggesting in a previous post. You do not have to buy a new iPhone to play games because the 3gs still plays 99% of the marketplace. If you do buy the newest hardware then you get 60fps instead of 30, widescreen support, or high-res textures; lesser hardware does not mean that you cannot play the game, it just means that you miss out on a few bells and whistles. So does this mean that the upgrade is unnecessary, maybe, but when does something being unnecessary equal it being automatically a bad thing, again, the iPhone 4s was unnecessary but millions of people still bought it.
Then there is the realities of a PC. If Microsoft was stupid enough to not create a rule that says a game has to work on any hardware that is less than four years old, then developers would be able to decide what system requirements are supported... just like a PC. Yet, name one PC game that does not support four year old gaming hardware (this does not include your overpriced macbook, or that $500 dell that came with on-board video because those are not gaming PC's). Instead of throwing out my old PC with an 8800gt (a card that came out almost six years ago) I set it up in the spare bedroom in case I wanted an old school LAN game. Guess what? My 8800gt sill plays Crysis 3 at 720p with playable frame rates, while still looking and functioning better than the 360 port. Just because there are different tiers to gaming platforms does not mean that the low tier gets the shaft, it just means that they do not have the best version. Then you have to look at all the people who do not give a shit about owning the best version of a game. Look at consoles in general, there is not one single multiplatform title that is better on console than its PC counterpart. Yet people still buy consoles instead of PC's, so how important is experiencing the best version of the game?
As far as new hardware releases confusing the customer like a PC. Well, whats wrong with a PC? The operating system is confusing for some people, the cost is more expensive than a console, and it takes research to build instead of just going into a store and grabbing a box off the shelf. So name one of those problems that will be introduced if a console comes out with yearly revisions? The cost will stay flat every year, just like a cell phone, and the price will certainly be less expensive than the equivalent gaming PC. It will still be presented in a box that you can just pick up off a shelf and buy (just like an iphone or a current 360). The only problem I can see is that it might get confusing for some people. This is a valid concern, but if Microsoft does yearly updates they can just call the thing Xbox, and you just go to the store and buy your Xbox. The only people that might get confused is elderly people buying a gift for their grandchild and see the two year old stock that BestBuy is clearing out for $199, instead of buying the new $399 console. Yet how is this any different than a parent picking up an old iphone 4s instead of the 5 for a child, or the kid who gets the Arcade SKU of the Xbox 360 instead of the version with a hard drive. Really this is only a problem for children that cannot afford to buy their own system. In the end, you still just go to a store, pick up a box, and go to the register. Only if you go into a store to buy a new console three years in, you get a better console.
Log in to comment