Why Project Natal is bullshit and people applauding it are dicks

  • 123 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for thekidnixon
TheKidNixon

1619

Forum Posts

2182

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#101  Edited By TheKidNixon

The parts of Natal that were most fascinating to me were the Star Trekkian (is that a word? IS NOW, BITCHES!) applications. The voice recognition of signing on, recognizing me and signing into my appropriate avatar is appealing to me. I could see  a very compelling game built around the Milo type of technology, and not even as AI. Imagine playing in a game like Heavy Rain as a detective, and instead of interviewing people using dialog trees, you actually talked to the TV and it responded. I'm not saying the technology is there yet, but the ability to interact with it is pretty fascinating as part of a larger experience.

"Traditional" games are not likely going anywhere. Despite what executives might think, the idea of "I push this button, and something cooresponds on screen" is a fairly simple concept. And the reason so many people don't play video games is simply because that mentality wasn't instilled in them at an earlier age. But like the Playstation Eye and the Wii Motion Control, I see Natal creating fascinating new gaming experiences that meld with those existing forms of play, not replacing them. The whole "You are the controller" philosophy is the fad, not the hardware itself.

Avatar image for thekidnixon
TheKidNixon

1619

Forum Posts

2182

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#102  Edited By TheKidNixon

Also, Natal sounds way too much Nutella. My mouth waters every time I hear it.

Avatar image for sunjammer
Sunjammer

1177

Forum Posts

408

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 7

#103  Edited By Sunjammer
@TheKidNixon: Well said
Avatar image for mordeaniischaos
MordeaniisChaos

5904

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

#104  Edited By MordeaniisChaos

First of all, this makes it so you can control your character in game, FULLY. It will probably make use of props, such as guns, swords, bats, etc, which could easily have rumble and the like built in. This is not just a motion gimmick. this can be used for not only serious, but AWESOME games. Full games. Imagine the climbing in Assassins creed if you could fully control your body. Or Mirror's Edge. Or, imagine being able to shoot somewhere other then the MIDDLE OF YOUR SCREEN, and walk around however you want, to dodge incoming fire realistically, to huddle behind cover.

Thats what this is ACTUALLY capable of.

Avatar image for thekidnixon
TheKidNixon

1619

Forum Posts

2182

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#105  Edited By TheKidNixon
@MordeaniisChaos said:
"

First of all, this makes it so you can control your character in game, FULLY. It will probably make use of props, such as guns, swords, bats, etc, which could easily have rumble and the like built in. This is not just a motion gimmick. this can be used for not only serious, but AWESOME games. Full games. Imagine the climbing in Assassins creed if you could fully control your body. Or Mirror's Edge. Or, imagine being able to shoot somewhere other then the MIDDLE OF YOUR SCREEN, and walk around however you want, to dodge incoming fire realistically, to huddle behind cover.

Thats what this is ACTUALLY capable of.

"
I think the problem with that is that you're still basically doing the same thing, or else things are very clumsy to be implemented.

For example: you're playing a character who has a characteristic of being athletic and agile. You're walking down the train tracks when a train is rushing towards you from behind and for some contrived reason you haven't noticed until right now. You need to roll out of the way, or your toast. At this point, you have two options:

1) Make a general motion that the sensor reads as "MordeaniisChaos wants to roll to the right, to avoid the train. He performed the necessary action at the correct time. Success!"

versus

2) You actually have to full perform the action of rolling out of the train, being read 1-to-1 within the game itself on an hyper accurate level.

Between you and me, I'd prefer the former. The idea that your reactions and actions are really being protrayed on screen is great on paper, but in functionality becomes a cluster fuck when the bad-ass things I want to do (like rolling out of the way of a fucking train) are out of the scope of possibility. In other words, I don't want to have to do these things. Mirror's Edge is relentlessly finicky with your margin of error already, I don't need it to expect me to be a parkour champ as well.
Avatar image for DELETE_zeushbien
Zeushbien

65

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 27

#106  Edited By Zeushbien

I'm sure when I was younger I would have been all over this thing for a few months then grown tired of it. But now to be honest, I really couldn't be less excited for this thing.. this is a modestly more advanced eyetoy as far as I can see..

Avatar image for pissedoffthewitch
pissedoffthewitch

571

Forum Posts

810

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@Sunjammer:
@Sunjammer said:
" The sense of touch is a god damn important thing to a whole lot of people. The Wii controllers at the very least let you feel things through rumble, and the basic sensation of holding a physical object. What this kind of utter bullshit does is take Sony's fuckup removal of the rumble from their SixAxis and multiply that by dozens. Even if it works as advertised, they have effectively removed the ability to feel what you are doing. You have a system where the user makes a larger physical investment and receives even less feedback than before. There is literally no tactile feedback to this system. Relaxation is out the window, you require a larger space for gameplay (not to mention multiplayer), and game designs are forced to rely on a technology that, unless this is SCI-FI HAPPY FUN LET'S-PRETEND-HOUR, is nowhere near as precise as even the cheapest mocap rig you'll find out there. A simple depth-aware camera (looks stereo to me) simply will not be enough. Kudo's hilarious attempts at demoing the mocap (even though this was an early version) and watching the thing freak the fuck out speaks volumes. I don't even want to get into the lighting conditions this thing probably requires.This shit is Playstation Eye all over again. Look forward to waving your hands popping balloons, and not feeling a god damn thing when you do. Technology trumping the user experience, what a fucking hoot.I'm actually kind of *angry* with people who think the next evolutionary step in controllers is removing buttons altogether. Say what you want about the Wii, pairing triangulation with accelerometers is a very solid first step towards a motion sensitive controller that is precise enough for gameplay and still capable of providing physical response. Maybe it's time someone stepped up and looked at gloves again? Jesus christ, let me FEEL something!Guess it needs saying that i'm a 360 owner and i love the system. Edit: The "dicks" thing is sort of tongue in cheek :P It's just my gut feeling. People wanting to take my toys away. Grr. "
I dont know if you can put "dicks" and "Tongue in cheek" in the same sentence without it being  funny.
Avatar image for endogene
Endogene

5185

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108  Edited By Endogene

You will need a rather large place for this since the camera will have to be able to see you from top to toe.

Avatar image for dalai
Dalai

7868

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By Dalai

Think of it this way.  This is totally optional this generation and it will not replace the 360 controller anytime soon, if ever.  So bitching about it is pointless since it's not a necessary product.

With that said, I'd cry bullshit.  I mean they diss the Wii waggling yet the girl during the demonstration looked like she was having a seizure.  Plus, we were all expecting super-precise motion controls out of the Wiimote yet that was never entirely true.

I'm sure it could be great in due time, but for now... I'm not sold on it.

Plus, Milo is creepy.

Avatar image for rabidmonkeyman
Rabidmonkeyman

19

Forum Posts

1475

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#110  Edited By Rabidmonkeyman

im tired of big companies taking small peoples ideas and backing it with $500 million rather than $10 million. it seems like, one company has an awesome idea, and then another company tries to one up it and put a full ride on this technology. why not try to make their OWN revolutionary idea rather than giving a bigger R&D budget towards an idea thats already been proven. im sick of 3 different avatars of myself, 3 different mocap devices, and 3 different "all in one" media devices.

Avatar image for smugdarkloser
SmugDarkLoser

5040

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By SmugDarkLoser
@Rabidmonkeyman said:
"im tired of big companies taking small peoples ideas and backing it with $500 million rather than $10 million. it seems like, one company has an awesome idea, and then another company tries to one up it and put a full ride on this technology. why not try to make their OWN revolutionary idea rather than giving a bigger R&D budget towards an idea thats already been proven. im sick of 3 different avatars of myself, 3 different mocap devices, and 3 different "all in one" media devices. "
Are you implying that MS doesn't do this either?....
Avatar image for sooperspy
Sooperspy

6485

Forum Posts

935

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 17

#112  Edited By Sooperspy
@Sunjammer: You Don't have to be such an asshole about it. Yeah, I think it looks stupid, but it looked liked the movements actually worked well with what was shown on screen.
It looks like a great way to compete with the wii and it actually might be a good feature for an already all around great console
Avatar image for sin4profit
Sin4profit

3505

Forum Posts

1621

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 2

#113  Edited By Sin4profit

Anyone play that totem game with the Xbox webcam...that game was ass...just sayin...

Nah, I dunno that i applaude it as a new revolution, but I am curious about the Natal ( so i guess that makes me a little dick, of all things), mostly for the auto sign in and menu controls ( i hate having to turn the controller on , wait 3 seconds and then hit the A button just to pause a movie every time i gotta piss), but would i pay $80-$100 for this thing just for that one convenience?

It can have potential if used right but most creative developers, i'd imagine, wouldn't bother doing anything with it unless it sells enough unites and the fact that the Xbox's main audience doesn't seem to have a great deal of interest in it, or motion controls in general at this point, i can't imagine it would sell much.

I'll keep my eye on it either way.

Avatar image for rabidmonkeyman
Rabidmonkeyman

19

Forum Posts

1475

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#114  Edited By Rabidmonkeyman
@SmugDarkLoser said:
"
@Rabidmonkeyman said:
"im tired of big companies taking small peoples ideas and backing it with $500 million rather than $10 million. it seems like, one company has an awesome idea, and then another company tries to one up it and put a full ride on this technology. why not try to make their OWN revolutionary idea rather than giving a bigger R&D budget towards an idea thats already been proven. im sick of 3 different avatars of myself, 3 different mocap devices, and 3 different "all in one" media devices. "
Are you implying that MS doesn't do this either?.... "
quite the contraty, im implying they ARE doing this with this stupid natal crap, i agree with the OP entierly on needing a controller or something to feel feedback with.  also, im certain they will not make back the money they spent on R&D for this thing in sales of this device. its incredibly niche, and with a probably cheaper camera already out there to do simple video chats/pictures of yourself, i dont see this selling very well.
Avatar image for natetodamax
natetodamax

19464

Forum Posts

65390

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 5

#115  Edited By natetodamax

Why Project Natal is awesome and people bashing it are dicks.

Avatar image for seppli
Seppli

11232

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By Seppli

Nothing stops the use of a controller with natal. If the tech works at least. This might be really sweet, if it actually works as well, as they make it seem.

Your ramblings, sir, are very narrow-minded.

Avatar image for banksrob
banksrob

1140

Forum Posts

913

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#117  Edited By banksrob

Some people clearly dont understand that t is far far more advanced than the eye toy

Avatar image for killdave
killdave

1079

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By killdave
@Sunjammer said:

Why Project Natal is bullshit and people applauding it are dicks

Have you tried it ? NO
Are you a dick ? YES
Where is it located ? ON YOUR HEAD
Avatar image for sunjammer
Sunjammer

1177

Forum Posts

408

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 7

#119  Edited By Sunjammer
@killdave: brilliant.

I admire some people's inability to read past the blog post and into the actual discussion that followed it. If you're not interested in a discussion, don't comment.
I also admire some people's inability to read the actual point of the post, which is lamenting the industry's lack of respect for tactile feedback.

If i was as blind as you, my life would probably be more enjoyable.
Avatar image for killdave
killdave

1079

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120  Edited By killdave

Lets see then -

Firstly you force your opinion on people by insiting they are DICKS if they applauding Natal. It's in your title!

Next you say that you need to "hold" something to enjoy yourself? Were you never a kid? Did you never use your mind to imagine a little? Use your hands and arms ? Run around a little? Jump up / dive for cover? Im guessing what you did do as a kid was sit on your ass shaking a wii-mote left and right.

"no tactile feedback" ? You are the controller .. how much feedback from your own movements do you want?

Ok so the playstaion eye burned you like many others. The Wii mote was a gimic, so now you insult anyone who dares to push the boundries a little?
The thing was only shown for the first time, you've not seen it in person or used it yet. How about you do those things before you blog away insulting people?


Avatar image for pweidman
pweidman

2891

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#121  Edited By pweidman
@Icil said:
"
@IncredibleBulk92 said:
" They weren't talking about the Natal as a traditional controller, their not talking about replacing the standard Xbox 360 controller or even integrating the Natal into existing games.  Their talking about this as a completely seperate product aimed at a more casual audience... "
Ugh. That argument makes me feel like it's all just Microsoft trying to bite into the Wii's pie. Totally makes sense considering Wii's success, Microsoft would dump money to get this kind of thing out as quickly as possible =("

You nailed it right there.  It's all about market share, and M$ wants more of that casual chunk.  Innovating and true viability are sidelights and PR concerns to them.  I doubt it'll ever be more than a gimmicky accessory though, or just a forerunner to something much better far down the road.
Avatar image for incrediblebulk92
IncredibleBulk92

948

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

@pweidman: It is all about market share and it is about trying to get a bit of money but my biggest concern is, who cares?  I don't begrudge Microsoft for trying to make a little bit of money, they keep bringing in the goods with regards to great games, products and services.  For every Natal and Spotlight channel (which I do not care about) they add a Party System or Facebook integration (which I do care about).  I don't think that Natal will kick off in a big way like the Wii did but I'm still interested in seeing just how good Milo is.

I think that it is safe to assume that Microsoft will keep building on this technology with the next generation of Xbox, maybe they'll even integrate it into the nextbox but I still don't believe that Microsoft is stupid enough to abandon the standard controller.  Motion or camera technology will never get to the same level of control and responsiveness as the controller is currently so there's no need for folkes like us to panic
Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

876

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By cspiffo
@Sunjammer:

I think your missing the point.  Someday someone will come out with a system just like this (Maybe it will be Natal) that will work.  Software will be aware of who you are and how you are feeling and react appropriately.  It has taken a lot of baby steps to get to this point.  Whether Natal is a significant improvement over other attempts remains to be seen but I for one am excited that companies like Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are pushing us forward toward this new reality.  Try to be more optimistically skeptical.