The problem I have with this viewpoint is that doing something IS training for that thing. At some point someone who has been doing journalism for years (despite any previous training) has accrued experience and training on the job that is at LEAST equal to prior training. There are tons of ways to learn, I think the viewpoint you are using here holds a single form up as the end all be all.
I agree, but that's only because you don't believe there is anything particularly impenetrable about journalism that requires "hard theoretical" knowledge. If I started performing surgeries, without a title, you'd hardly call me a surgeon unless I had some deep knowledge and success doing it, and even if I happened to succeed and learned the basics, I doubt anyone would be OK with declaring me a surgeon.
But I guess that's an extreme. In general, the more specific the knowledge required, the more we agree as a society that professional training is needed.
To me it is a technicality, but a necessary one, I don't think being academically trained as a journalist is more or less valid than working as one.
It is even likely that the real world effectively provides a more useful training technical training ( but it undeniably lacks a lot in the more inscrutable and less intuitive theoretical training. The old discussion of theory vs practice). And it is likely that the best people have a balance of both kinds of knowledge.
For functional purposes, If someone has a professional degree in journalism ( or some similar career ) they are journalists, and if they don't but work as a journalist, they simply work as one. In this way, a "non journalist" could potentially perform better as a journalist than a trained one, but it still doesn't change the denomination. At least that is how I see it.
Again, not saying that there is a better or worse one, but there are certainly specific techniques, ethics and exposition that are surely trainable in a variety of ways.
However I do consider that as a communicator, the profession does require having some specific abilities and techniques, and simply having a space online to ask questions doesn't constitute journalism.
This Hip Hop gamer guy, for example, is a gamer who conducts interviews about the Gaming Industry, but I wouldn't dub him a journalist. And there's nothing wrong with that. I don't have a problem with it, and neither should he.
Log in to comment