Battlefield Bad Company or Burnout Paradise

Topic started by mellenman on June 13, 2009. Last post by FrankCanada97 4 months, 3 weeks ago.
Post by mellenman (46 posts)

Poll: Battlefield Bad Company or Burnout Paradise

  • Battlefield Bad Company
  • Burnout Paradise
Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
Which one would you get if you didnt have either game.


Post by jukezypoo (917 posts) See mini bio
1001 ACH / 24145 P

Loading...
Wait, what?


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
@jukezypoo: which game would you get if you were me


Post by torus (674 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
I would go with Bad Company, because it's a great game, and I don't like racers much.


Post by jukezypoo (917 posts) See mini bio
1001 ACH / 24145 P

Loading...
@mellenman said:
" @jukezypoo: which game would you get if you were me "
I understand, the games are just entirely different.

if you want a racer that lasts a long time and is continuing to expand, get burnout.

If you want a shooter with a short-but-sweet singleplayer portion and a fun multiplayer mode, get Bad Company.


Post by PeasForFees (1,567 posts) See mini bio
490 ACH / 7640 P

Loading...
Bad Company is not that great, Paradise is a metric ton better


Post by Ineedaname (1,781 posts) See mini bio
342 ACH / 3675 P

Loading...
BC is a good game but I always get lag in competitive multiplayer matches which is the only way to unlock guns.
I'd say burnout with all of it's new content.


Post by Azteck (624 posts) See mini bio
272 ACH / 5050 P

Loading...
I'd say Burnout, especially since BC2 is just around the bend. Get that one instead.


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
@Azteck: are you saying to get burnout?


Post by Azteck (624 posts) See mini bio
272 ACH / 5050 P

Loading...
Yes, yes I am.


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
I got Burnout!


Post by FrankCanada97 (1,279 posts) See mini bio
86 ACH / 1450 P

Loading...
Wow, that was fast.


Post by Azteck (624 posts) See mini bio
272 ACH / 5050 P

Loading...
Dude do you live in the store or something?


Post by Brundage (239 posts) See mini bio
809 ACH / 11621 P

Loading...
@FrankCanada97 said:
" Wow, that was fast. "
@Azteck said:
" Dude do you live in the store or something? "
i lol'd


Post by FrankCanada97 (1,279 posts) See mini bio
86 ACH / 1450 P

Loading...
I'm curious, why these two games specifically?


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
they were both games that i had rented multiple times and were both only $20.00.... i got burnout because that was voted around 40% more and i was thinking that nobody would play Bad company because the Battlefield 1943 is coming out in a couple of weeks. I will probably get  1943 and resubscribe to xbox live once that comes out.


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
@Azteck: lol... i was leaving really shortly and i just wanted a quick opinion. 


Post by Seppli (372 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
Either is a good choice.

As a Battlefield fan though, I resent your choice! No matter, what game I play, I always return to Battlefield : Bad Companys 'Gold Rush' mode. Why play another game, when it's less intense, less visceral, less bombastic, less fun, than my all time favorite game?

Battlefield : Bad Company (multiplayer) is my gaming baseline. Very few games hold up to the beat. A none of them hold up for long.

Youtube Battlefield : Bad Company Gameplay Montage - Happy Fun Time (aka Power Drill Kills)

Youtube Battlefield : Bad Company Gameplay Montage - Kill Thrills

The width of strategy and tactics on the multi-tier gold rush maps. The depth of every kit (class), weapon and vehicle. The bang of destructibility and high quality surround sound. It all adds up to an incredibly satisfying multiplayer experience. Unrivaled at this time.


Post by mellenman (46 posts) See mini bio
447 ACH / 7810 P

Loading...
@Seppli: well i was thinking of battlefield 1943, and i was pretty sure that i wanted that  so i decided to get burnout waint a couple of weeks and than get 1943 with a xbox live gold card


Post by FinalBoss (14 posts) See mini bio
1101 ACH / 19498 P

Loading...
I own both games and can say they are both awesome. However I would definiatly pick Burnout Paridase. There is just so many things to do and a lot of dlc to keep you busy for a long time. It is one of my favorite games.


Post by leky1 (455 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
dude you cant compare a racer and a shootter it makes no sense


Post by RHCPfan24 (6,252 posts) See mini bio
1180 ACH / 24430 P

Loading...
BOTH........and they both are the best EA games next to Dead Space of last year. Just get both, they are cheap. They are impossible to compare. I would probably pick Burnout Paradise because that is one of my favorite games of this generation but, seriously, not good comparisons going on here.


Post by Out_On_Bail (1,193 posts) See mini bio
1238 ACH / 21602 P

Loading...
@leky1: He never compared them, he asked which he should get.  And I think his reasoning behind Burnout is warranted. Even if I think BF:BC is more fun.


Post by leky1 (455 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
@Out_On_Bail said:
" @leky1: He never compared them, he asked which he should get.  And I think his reasoning behind Burnout is warranted. Even if I think BF:BC is more fun. "
ohhh!i voted burnout


Post by Maxszy (1,116 posts) See mini bio
466 ACH / 8400 P

Loading...
Burnout Paradise. Oh god yes,  Burnout Paradise. One of the best games of this generation. There's SO much to do! Its great!


Post by Jeffsekai (986 posts) See mini bio
1870 ACH / 32278 P

Loading...
I have both, and since I dont really like Racing games as much as FPS I would go with BC...strangely tho I do have more time in Burnout haha.


Post by FrankCanada97 (1,279 posts) See mini bio
86 ACH / 1450 P

Loading...
Maybe you should pass over BF 1943 and wait for Bad Company 2 to come out?