Ahhh a conservative!

  • 104 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for l4wd0g
l4wd0g

2395

Forum Posts

353

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#1  Edited By l4wd0g

 

I was listening to the Rebel FM Podcast and they started talking bashing  Shadow Complex because of the relationship between  Donald Mustard and  Orson Scott Card. What a lame reason to trash a game. 

So, why is that always the response from the gaming media when they find out a game is made by either a Christian or a conservative?  One, that isn’t very tolerant. Two, some religious, economic, or political beliefs shouldn’t turn you off to a game.

Yes, Orson Scott Card is a conservative.  Yes, he is a Mormon.  So, who cares?  He wrote Ender’s Game. What he does in his private life shouldn’t be any concern of yours.

  • J.R.R. Tolkien was Catholic.
  • Michael Crichton a conservative.  As a side note, I love Michael Crichton.   The man was a genius.
  • Sid Miere is a Christian.
 
 The list goes on and on.
 

With the assumption, games are art; let us separate the art from the artist.

Avatar image for pinworm45
Pinworm45

4069

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#2  Edited By Pinworm45

You're kind of covering up the beef. The issue was that he wanted gays killed or something stupid. I don't remember, but it was more than "he's a conservative". He definitely donated a lot of money to some legally-and-morally questionable things that wished no pleasantries upon homosexuals, and so people thought (correctly so) that money to Shadow Complex was money to gay-bashing. 
 
Not that I'm one of them, mind you, I thought Shadow Complex was amazing. 
 
Kinda old news though.

Avatar image for davidwitten22
davidwitten22

1712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By davidwitten22

I am a Mormon and I approve of Ender's Game. The rest of the post I don't really have much of an opinion on.

Avatar image for fourwude
FourWude

2274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By FourWude

This is major OLD news, from 18 months ago.

And secondly, a lot of the criticism that flowed Orson Scott Card's way wasn't because he was a Christian but because some felt offended at his virulent anti-homosexual agendas, as well as his other activities. He's less conservative and more a neo-conservative. You should go study up on some of his beliefs, relationship with certain organizations and the agendas he pushes forward.

Do you see Sid Meier getting bashed around?

Avatar image for bybeach
bybeach

6754

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By bybeach

What does Christians or catholics got to do with liberals or conservatives?  I'm just asking, no tone meant.
 
shadow complex is excellent, and that is coming from a damned liberal. when he interjects his political or religious beliefs into a 2nd coming of a vengfull old testament god rather than Christ,, and all good non-believers and liberals die, that is when I will ignore him. 
 
Otherwise I almost do not want to know this. I want more shadow complex. 
 
Edit, the more I read..whats wrong with just being simply conservative these days. Why is it ppl. feel so threatened you can hear their anuses constricting? I actually mean that towards you Mr. Card.
Avatar image for benpack
benpack

3926

Forum Posts

7030

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#6  Edited By benpack

Shit like this is why they don't like OSC. I bet there's a lot of conservitive dudes out there making games that they know via being in the industry, and I'm sure they don't bash their games because they are conservative.

Avatar image for beej
beej

1675

Forum Posts

417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By beej

 but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those whoflagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.    

You know what? I'm ok with bashing on an agenda like that, not freaking out over conservativism as a concept, but that statement is kind of disgusting.
Avatar image for radix
radix

42

Forum Posts

342

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By radix

Michael Chrichton is a bad example because his conservative views often showed up in his writing, such as in State of Fear where he is basically denying global warming as something that exists, which is a view held pretty much exclusively by conservatives.

Avatar image for warofart
artofwar420

6994

Forum Posts

290

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 7

#9  Edited By artofwar420

I'm with Matt Rorie in this one.

Avatar image for manhattan_project
manhattan_project

2336

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@artofwar420 said:
"

I'm with Matt Rorie in this one.

"
I too am on Matt Rories side...why are we here?
Avatar image for deactivated-6418ef3727cdd
deactivated-6418ef3727cdd

2721

Forum Posts

697

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

After reading through this thread I have concluded that he's kind of a dick.

Avatar image for salad10203
salad10203

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By salad10203
@GlenTennis said:
" Shit like this is why they don't like OSC. I bet there's a lot of conservitive dudes out there making games that they know via being in the industry, and I'm sure they don't bash their games because they are conservative. "
Avatar image for mcribs
McRibs

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By McRibs

 

The issue with Shadow Complex was that the game loosely tied into a universe developed by Orson Scott Card, the connection was  so loose in fact that it was almost irrelevant. The problem arose when it came out that Orson Scott Card was giving a good portion of his profits on any endeavor to anti-gay foundation and groups. This supposedly included people like the god hates fags group who will protest at funerals of aids victims regardless of their sexual orientation and even now the funerals of soldiers.  
 
Chair is criticized for involving Orson Scott Card on projects where the need of his involvement is questionable. Again Shadow Complex was about a militia group trying to over throw America. Chair tied the game's premise to a book Card hard written by using the militia from the book's name, but outside of that there is really no connection. People who take issue with Chair feel that Chair is finding any reason to involve Orson Scott Card in projects and thus providing him with money, which in turn he uses to help extremist groups. 
 
That's why there is an issue, but seriously.... Shadow Complex was a great game....    

Avatar image for cheeseknight5
cheeseknight5

26

Forum Posts

19

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#14  Edited By cheeseknight5

Drives me up the fucking wall whenever I find a Mormon in favor of passing laws to ban booze/tobacco/gays. A strong foundation to their beliefs is the freedom of choice, and the consequences are supposed to be distributed by God, not government.  
 
Legal punishments for homosexuality? You've got to be joking. As long as they aren't getting married in your temples you shouldn't care.

Avatar image for triple07
triple07

1268

Forum Posts

208

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#15  Edited By triple07

I heard this and was actually really curious as to why they were hating on Orson Scott Card. After reading this thread I have to think it was his gay bashing and not his conservatism.

Avatar image for csl316
csl316

17004

Forum Posts

765

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#16  Edited By csl316

My understanding is that Card's stance on gays pisses off a lot of people, not just the fact that he's Mormon.  But honestly, someone's work should be the only thing that matters, imo.  Despite their religious or political views, or what they say.
 
If a game starts being devalued because a designer shows up in a tabloid or says/is something unpopular, I'll be sad.  But when Tim Schaefer called Kotick a prick, or when Mark Rein was an ass at an indie gathering, it all blew over quick.  So hopefully this OSC hate is an isolated incident.

Avatar image for stephengotlost
stephengotlost

714

Forum Posts

475

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#17  Edited By stephengotlost

They didn't diss Orson because he was a conservative, it was mainly his strong anti-homophobia.
That said, it's true the game shouldn't be attached so strongly to his views, even if Donald Mustard and Orson Scott Card had a close working relationship, the programmers, animators, and artists are the ones who ultimately craft the experience - not Mr. Card.
As for the possibility of purchasing the game and funding Mr. Card in the slightest way, there is a ton of unsavory aspects about purchasing any consumer goods.

Avatar image for mars_cleric
Mars_Cleric

1654

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#18  Edited By Mars_Cleric

I like fun games
shadow complex was fun 
nuff said

Avatar image for animasta
Animasta

14948

Forum Posts

3563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

#19  Edited By Animasta
@csl316 said:
" My understanding is that Card's stance on gays pisses off a lot of people, not just the fact that he's Mormon.  But honestly, someone's work should be the only thing that matters, imo.  Despite their religious or political views, or what they say.  If a game starts being devalued because a designer shows up in a tabloid or says/is something unpopular, I'll be sad.  But when Tim Schaefer called Kotick a prick, or when Mark Rein was an ass at an indie gathering, it all blew over quick.  So hopefully this OSC hate is an isolated incident. "
it's also that his books that aren't Ender's Game are pretty terrible, and I don't think Ender's is a very good book either.
Avatar image for beej
beej

1675

Forum Posts

417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By beej
@Turducken: Uh, you're ignoring the part where he says the law should be used as a tool against adult homosexuals in order to keep them from being equal citizens. Sorry if I become a little intolerant of someone demanding that equality be ignored. Also if what @McRibs said is correct then it seems like that's a decent enough reason to dislike the purchase of a product. If every sale of orange juice supported the oppression of homosexuals I would probably tell people not to buy orange juice despite the fact that it's basically my favorite thing ever. 
Avatar image for turducken
Turducken

33

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#21  Edited By Turducken
@GlenTennis said:

" Shit like this is why they don't like OSC. I bet there's a lot of conservitive dudes out there making games that they know via being in the industry, and I'm sure they don't bash their games because they are conservative. "

Shit like what?  That seemed fairly well-reasoned and tolerant.  It made the statement that homosexuality is, in his view, a sin against God - stated as such in the Bible - and should be treated as such (something to be avoided, provided, of course, that one believes in that God).  You may not agree with it, but that's no reason to trash the man or his art.  ESPECIALLY, when one is claiming to be tolerant themselves.  For example, George Bernard Shaw was a good playwright, despite being a rabid Stalinist that advocated eugenics and said this (on video): 
 

"  You must all know half a dozen at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth.  Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence?

“If you can’t justify your existence, if you’re not pulling your weight [garbled], if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then, clearly, we cannot use the organizations of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself."

Oscar Wilde was also a socialist, yet his play, The Importance of Being Earnest , was one of the funniest ones I have ever seen.  I, on the other hand, am a libertarian - about as far from socialism as possible without going into the realms of anarchy.  But I have no problem with different beliefs in art - Hollywood movies generally espouse a more liberal point of view, but I still see them.  Apparently, there is no problem, unless the artist is a conservative or a Christian (or both) and then everyone gets up in arms about their beliefs being bad and "don't support that stuff".  Why is that?  Sean Penn said that people who criticize the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez should be imprisoned.  Where is the outrage?  How about you separate politics from your gaming as much as possible and just play GOOD GAMES.  Especially when the political point of view causing the outrage isn't even mentioned in the game.

 
 Chair is criticized for involving Orson Scott Card on projects where the need of his involvement is questionable. Again Shadow Complex was about a militia group trying to over throw America. Chair tied the game's premise to a book Card hard written by using the militia from the book's name, but outside of that there is really no connection. People who take issue with Chair feel that Chair is finding any reason to involve Orson Scott Card in projects and thus providing him with money, which in turn he uses to help extremist groups.       
The IP was actually created by Chair, licensed to Card for the purposes of writing a book on it, and that is the connection.  There is also an "Empire" movie in production, as well.  Furthermore, Shadow Complex actually bridges the gap between the Empire novel and its sequel "Hidden Empire".  So, really, the only money Card is getting is from the books - so unless you were so intrigued by the story of Shadow Complex as to buy Card's books - unlikely if you have such an issue with him as to boycott anything tangentially related - then it isn't even a logical idea to boycott it....
Avatar image for fourwude
FourWude

2274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By FourWude
@Turducken said:
  How about you separate politics from your gaming as much as possible and just play GOOD GAMES. 

It would be easier if many games, especially war games, weren't so laced with politics themselves. It certainly doesn't help when the likes of Call of Duty push forth a frat-boy revisionist mentality of what war is like.
Avatar image for slaker117
Slaker117

4873

Forum Posts

3305

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

#23  Edited By Slaker117
@Turducken:  At some point he is being a dick. From my understanding, his intolerance of gays is pretty gross. I don't care whether or not his God tells him it's ok. People don't like supporting people who are dicks.
 
I liked Ender's Game, but OSC is not someone who I want to encourage. It didn't stop me from buying Shadow Complex either, but only because ties to him seemed superficial. I get your point, but just because you don't have a problem with it doesn't mean people who do are simply intolerant. No one is forcing anything, they are just choosing not to support what they do not agree with.
Avatar image for turducken
Turducken

33

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#24  Edited By Turducken
@beej:  You see it as preventing them from being equal citizens.  He sees it as in the same vein as stopping people from getting raw milk if they want it.  The way you see equality is a myth.  Equality under the law does not dictate what the law actually is - only that it be fairly applied to all citizens regardless of innate characteristics (such as race, etc.).  Religion is the only exception to that under the law, due to the first amendment.  Sexual orientation has not been proven to be an innate characteristic of a person, and marriage is not a civil right under the law. 
 
Not that I am advocating his position - I just don't see a contrary opinion to be something that should be boycott worthy, especially when it isn't even mentioned in the product.  For the record, I am for allowing gays to marry (under the civil defintion, not the religious - obviously).  I am also for allowing people to purchase and ingest raw milk (or trans fats, or even currently illegal/controlled drugs) should they freely choose to do so.  I am also for allowing non-government entities to discriminate if they so choose - they will merely lose the business/respect of everyone they come in contact with - the free market eliminates discrimination far more than the government does (which generally leads to discrimination against the formerly discriminatory party - like affirmative action).  As I said, I am a libertarian.  The only thing I disagree with the standard libertarian position on (so far as  I know) is abortion, as I view it as the murder of a child, and even under a libertarian philosophy, the law must protect against the harm of citizens through force or fraud.  (Plus, why is it illegal to kill an unborn child if you aren't the mother?  It counts as murder then.  Shouldn't it, if the fetus is just "part of the woman's body" count as no more than breaking a leg, or causing some other injury?  Seems hypocritical to me, but I digress.) 
  
The point being that Card's political views and this game produced by Chair Entertainment, which is minorly affiliated with him, shouldn't conflict.
Avatar image for captainobvious
CaptainObvious

2993

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#25  Edited By CaptainObvious

There's a dude named Donald Mustard in Shadow Complex?
 
AWESOME

Avatar image for korolev
korolev

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 8

#26  Edited By korolev

As long as their beliefs don't bleed into the fiction they write, I agree. There's nothing saying that a conservative can't write well. And it depends on what you mean by "conservative" - there are many different types of conservative, and few people fit neatly into any one category. I myself, have a mix of liberal and conservative beliefs. When it comes to science and religion and most social politics, I am very liberal. But when it comes to most economic matters, and criminal matters, I am very conservative. So what do I fall under? A libertarian? But I support Social Welfare within reason, and many libertarians want that entirely abolished. With regards to genetic engineering and medicine, I support pharma-companies and agri-science businesses, which many would say is a "conservative" thing to do, yet I also believe that Climate Change is a threat that must be dealt with, again something many would say is a very "liberal" thing. 
 
So you can't just pigeon hole people into "conservative = this" or "liberal = this". People are more complex than that. To just say "he's a conservative, therefore, nothing he/she says is worth paying attention to" is silly thinking. The same applies to conservatives to dismiss liberals. No one is perfect, no one is right all the time.  
 
With Orson Scott Card, I can't say that I've ever read a single one of his books. I do know that Shadow Complex is a good game, but he didn't make the game, it's just set in the universe tied to one of his books. Do I disagree with Card's world-view and philosophy? Probably. Do I disagree with his books? I haven't read them. Do I have to hate Shadow Complex? Certainly not. I am aware of Card's hostility towards gay people and atheists, but that doesn't come across in Shadow Complex, so no harm done.

Avatar image for beej
beej

1675

Forum Posts

417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#27  Edited By beej
@Turducken: Well I have a few responses here. 
1) With regards to your claim that the way I view equality is a myth. I believe the Iowa state Supreme Court may beg to differ when they write " The primary constitutional principle at 
the heart of this case is the doctrine of equal protection." Obviously I'm no legal expert but it would appear that rights of homosexuals, and issues of equality are in fact linked. But let's examine the issue a little with a choice quotation concerning suspect classifications. If I might digress for a second first though I'd like to discuss the myth of equality under the law that you are perpetrating. Laws can make divisions between us, and these divisions are considered  just or not based on what suspect class is being created. Therefore the law can and does consider innate characteristics, (for instance gender is only worthy of intermediate scrutiny) this point isn't incredibly pressing, I just felt like it was worth noting.  
To get to the quotation " In most cases, we apply a very deferential standard known as the “rational basis test.”  Id.  Under the rational basis test, “[t]he plaintiff has the heavy burden of showing the statute unconstitutional and must negate every reasonable basis upon which the classification may be sustained.”  Bierkamp v. Rogers, 293 N.W.2d 577, 579–80 (Iowa 1980).  In deference to the legislature, a statute will satisfy the requirements of the equal protection clause “so long as there is a plausible policy reason for the classification, the legislative facts on which the classification is apparently based rationally may have been considered to be true by the governmental decisionmaker, and the relationship of the classification to its goal is not so attenuated as to render the distinction arbitrary or irrational.”... ... Nonetheless, the deference built into the rational basis test is not dispositive because this court engages in a meaningful review of all legislation challenged on equal protection grounds by applying the rational basis test to the facts of each case." The point being here that whenever this kind of distinction is made it is reviewed on grounds founded in notions of equality. I don't have to contend that homosexuality should be dealt with strict scrutiny to think that this is an issue of equality.  
To provide an additional argument to this point, let's pretend for a second that we are applying the rational basis test, given that Vaughn Walker recently found "  The genetic relationship between a parent and a child is not related to a child’s adjustment outcomes." as fact, it seems like there isn't a legitimate state interest that is fulfilled and therefore we could argue that from a legal perspective gay marriage is an issue that harms equality. Also if I understand law correctly findings of fact rarely get overturned in the appeals process. 
2) Despite all of what I just said, both you and I are guilty of looking at what Card said as a matter of equality only. The belief that the state ought to use the law to punish bedroom behavior seems to be blatantly unconstitutional based on my understanding of Lawrence V. Texas. 
3) the free market debate is specious and one that I'd like to register my disagreement with but leave at that. 
Avatar image for jakj
JakJ

1045

Forum Posts

4907

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By JakJ

When the Christians and Conservatives stop directly forcing their beliefs upon my personal life, I'll start being much more tolerant of theirs.
 
Until that day, those criticisms are valid.

Avatar image for l4wd0g
l4wd0g

2395

Forum Posts

353

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#29  Edited By l4wd0g
@Pinworm45 said:
" You're kind of covering up the beef. The issue was that he wanted gays killed or something stupid. I don't remember, but it was more than "he's a conservative". He definitely donated a lot of money to some legally-and-morally questionable things that wished no pleasantries upon homosexuals, and so people thought (correctly so) that money to Shadow Complex was money to gay-bashing.  Not that I'm one of them, mind you, I thought Shadow Complex was amazing.  Kinda old news though. "
I tried to find where said that but I can't find with with google. Can you point me in the right direction?
Avatar image for pillclinton
PillClinton

3604

Forum Posts

210

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By PillClinton

are games art?

Avatar image for barrock
Barrock

4185

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#31  Edited By Barrock

Nothing to do with him being Conservative. All about him saying things like this... 
 

Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.

The goal of the polity is not to put homosexuals in jail. The goal is to discourage people from engaging in homosexual practices in the first place, and, when they nevertheless proceed in their homosexual behavior, to encourage them to do so discreetly, so as not to shake the confidence of the community in the polity's ability to provide rules for safe, stable, dependable marriage and family relationships.

Oh and this 
 
" How long before married people answer the dictators thus: Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn.  "
Avatar image for subjugation
Subjugation

4993

Forum Posts

963

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#32  Edited By Subjugation

I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man.

Avatar image for greennoodles
greennoodles

462

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#33  Edited By greennoodles
@JakJ said:

" When the Christians and Conservatives stop directly forcing their beliefs upon my personal life, I'll start being much more tolerant of theirs.  Until that day, those criticisms are valid. "

See, this is the problem. You make that statement as if ALL Christians and Conservatives do this. There are plenty that don't but you ignore that. Just like The Conservatives that complain about the "liberal" media and actors constantly cramming global warming and socialism down their throat. So the majority of each party want the vocal minority of the opposing party to shut up, causing them to hate each other, when most people on both side do keep to themselves. It is a vicious cycle. 
 
BTW, the defining trait of a guy like OSC isn't that he is Mormon or conservative, its that he is a fucking asshole. If you want to not support him because of that it's cool, but no need to trot out the other two things. There are plenty of Mormons and conservatives that do not share his views.
Avatar image for gabriel
Gabriel

4139

Forum Posts

638

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#34  Edited By Gabriel

Fuck yeah Michel Crichton.

Avatar image for brendan
Brendan

9414

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#35  Edited By Brendan
@weeman105 said:
"I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man. "

Don't worry, you'll grow up and accept it someday. 
Avatar image for ediscool
EdIsCool

1140

Forum Posts

112

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

#36  Edited By EdIsCool
@Brendan said:
" @weeman105 said:
"I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man. "
Don't worry, you'll grow up and accept it someday.  "
he will accept the idea of two men in love, or he will accept the penis?
Avatar image for brendan
Brendan

9414

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#37  Edited By Brendan
@EdIsCool said:
" @Brendan said:
" @weeman105 said:
"I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man. "
Don't worry, you'll grow up and accept it someday.  "
he will accept the idea of two men in love, or he will accept the penis? "

Hopefully the first, indifferent towards the second.
Avatar image for pinworm45
Pinworm45

4069

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#38  Edited By Pinworm45
@weeman105 said:
" I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man. "
A penis belongs wherever the fuck the owner wants to put it, so long as the receiver is accepting of that. What fucking business is it of yours what someone wants to do with their own genitals and consensual partner? It's really quite easy to avoid looking up gay porn (start with not looking up gay porn) and if some homosexuals are gaying it up in front of you in your house, I suggest phoning the police as that sounds like breaking and entering and at least a few laws on sexual harassment which would apply to heterosexuals as well.
Avatar image for barrock
Barrock

4185

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#39  Edited By Barrock
@Pinworm45 said:
" @weeman105 said:
" I don't know about you guys, but I get the heebie geebies when I see dudes kissing other dudes. A penis belongs in a woman, not another man. "
A penis belongs wherever the fuck the owner wants to put it, so long as the receiver is accepting of that. What fucking business is it of yours what someone wants to do with their own genitals and consensual partner? It's really quite easy to avoid looking up gay porn (start with not looking up gay porn) and if some homosexuals are gaying it up in front of you in your house, I suggest phoning the police as that sounds like breaking and entering and at least a few laws on sexual harassment which would apply to heterosexuals as well. "
Wait.... that's not normal? Blokes have been going at it for weeks now.
Avatar image for jmood88
jmood88

417

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#40  Edited By jmood88
@triple07 said:
" I heard this and was actually really curious as to why they were hating on Orson Scott Card. After reading this thread I have to think it was his gay bashing and not his conservatism. "
...Which the thread starter would've known if he had actually listened to what they said about Card.
Avatar image for actiontaco
actionTACO

496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By actionTACO

when they came for the homophobes, i did not speak up because i was not a homophobe 
when they came for the conservatives, i did not speak up because i was not a conservative 
and then the world became a much better place. you're welcome

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10887

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#42  Edited By sweep  Moderator

 "With the assumption, games are art; let us separate the art from the artist.     "



No Caption Provided
Avatar image for melcene
melcene

3214

Forum Posts

1475

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#43  Edited By melcene
@bybeach said:
" What does Christians or catholics got to do with liberals or conservatives?  I'm just asking, no tone meant. "
Good question.  Ask non-conservatives.  They assume that all conservatives are some sort of bible-thumpers, and point to those two denominations as the bible-thumping denominations. 
 
@l4wd0g said:
"So, why is that always the response from the gaming media when they find out a game is made by either a Christian or a conservative?  One, that isn’t very tolerant. Two, some religious, economic, or political beliefs shouldn’t turn you off to a game."
I have heard (from people I personally know and respect) complaints from people that it isn't just the gaming media, but media in general has a problem with conservatives, especially any denomination of Christians.  Most recently, one of the arguments I heard (from same people) to support that belief is that whether in movies, TV, news, news blogs, etc, Christians of any denomination are made out to be wack jobs.  There are rarely the quiet religious people anymore in our media and entertainment.  I don't know that I fully agree with this argument, but it's one I've heard. 
 
Also:  it's the cool thing to do to hate on conservatives and religious people of any Christian denomination.  Change to some other denomination though, and everyone will be fighting to protect your rights.
Avatar image for deactivated-5afdd08777389
deactivated-5afdd08777389

1651

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

The problem for conservatives is that most people think of  Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin. I am a conservative Christian, but I am at least twice as sane as Palin. :-) 
 
I don't think people should skip out on games or movies based on whether they agree with the philosophical viewpoints of the creator. I like to keep an open mind and keep informed. I watch all of the Coen Brothers movies, not because I agree with their nihilistic worldview, but because I think they are creative and interesting. 
 
It would be like me deciding not to buy any Apple products because they donated money to prop 8. That's just nuts people. 

Avatar image for kierkegaard
Kierkegaard

718

Forum Posts

4822

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 2

#45  Edited By Kierkegaard
@wewantsthering said:
" The problem for conservatives is that most people think of  Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin. I am a conservative Christian, but I am at least twice as sane as Palin. :-)  I don't think people should skip out on games or movies based on whether they agree with the philosophical viewpoints of the creator. I like to keep an open mind and keep informed. I watch all of the Coen Brothers movies, not because I agree with their nihilistic worldview, but because I think they are creative and interesting.  It would be like me deciding not to buy any Apple products because they donated money to prop 8. That's just nuts people.  "
No, that's activist consumerism. See, when you fill out you're taxes, you have the option to donate some money to a cause you care for. When you spend money on a product and that company is known to support bigoted groups, you, through the transitive property, are also supporting those groups.  
 
It was revealed some months ago that one of Target's head dudes put a ton of money into a homophobic idiot's campaign. Consumers responded with boycotts and Target had to win them back with apologies and promises and showing that they hired many gay employees and supported the community.  
 
In other words, what we do and do not spend our money on matters. And it's not nuts. 
Avatar image for jjweatherman
JJWeatherman

15144

Forum Posts

5249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 18

#46  Edited By JJWeatherman

Mormons are terrible. Seriously. I'm sure a few of them are very nice people, but some of their beliefs and practices are downright hateful.
 
That said though, I loved Shadow Complex.

Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

#47  Edited By LegalBagel

It looks like most people have hit the highlights of why OSC in particular is despised despite most of us loving Ender's Game at one point in our lives.  Once I saw where his money goes, I've refused to buy anything else by him.
 
But I'll also add that the book Shadow Complex was based on was viewed by most as a fairly transparent attempt to bash liberals and paint them as stupid/insane.  So there were some concerns that the game would go along with those same ideas, which would have entirely ruined what was one of my favorite games of two years ago.  Luckily they didn't take any of the actual plot of the book, to the point where they only called the bad guys the "Restoration" as opposed to the "Progressive Restoration" as I think the book has it.  I believe in a Bombcast Brad said he had tried to read the book and couldn't finish it for those reasons.

Avatar image for toma
TomA

2787

Forum Posts

188

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#48  Edited By TomA

That is stupid. I bet if we was a a hardcore liberal people it wouldst have made a difference. But it shouldn't make a difference anyway. 
Also, the dude that wrote the Narnia books was a devout Christian as well. That's why, you know, The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe is essentialy a metaphor for the sacrifice of Jesus.

Avatar image for actiontaco
actionTACO

496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By actionTACO

nonoon, i buy things from people i don't support because i am open minded, not because i'm a spineless pussy with no sense of self-control. 

Avatar image for barrock
Barrock

4185

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#50  Edited By Barrock
@TomA said:
" That is stupid. I bet if we was a a hardcore liberal people it wouldst have made a difference. But it shouldn't make a difference anyway.  Also, the dude that wrote the Narnia books was a devout Christian as well. That's why, you know, The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe is essentialy a metaphor for the sacrifice of Jesus. "
What sort of statements would a hardcore liberal make that would piss most people off? And it's not about him being religious. A lot of people that make art are religious but they don't make stupid remarks about fighting the "gay menace". Most websites are based in either New York or California, both of which have a high population of liberal people.