So what's this title about? Well, I was talking to AjayRaz, and AjayRaz being AjayRaz posts pictures of Ayane and other women of DOA2 on our discussion. Out of nowhere like a ninja, my mum walks in. My mum sees the pictures, and with a steely glint, proceeds to slap me in the face. This is what happens being friends with a lover of all things DOA.
Now then, another topic that has come into my mind are the killstreaks in Modern Warfare 2. Who here uses Counter-UAVs over Care Packages? EMPs? Helicopters? The
majority of people use one over another, and I know nobody who uses EMP as a killstreak. At first, I thought that Harriers and Helicopters were pretty balanced, maybe a shade in the Harrier's direction. Then a Harrier proceeded to destroy my Pablo-I mean, Pave Low. I just don't understand-the Harrier is better in almost all aspects (though helicopters may be thought of as better in Hardcore Search and Destroy), and it also gets that awesome ability? Meanwhile, we have Counter-UAVs, which almost nobody uses. There are very limited uses. EMPs interest me-I say if you are going for an EMP you might as well just get the nuke and be done with it.
My solution? Power the weaker ones or nerf the stronger ones. Harriers being an 8 kill streak instead might change a lot-maybe making Helicopters having a Harrier's power and vice versa would probably change moreso. I say that EMPs should last the rest of the round-makes everything a bit more interesting. Counter-UAVs should be 3 kill streaks, not 4, because their sole point (pretty much) is to eliminate UAVs by other players, so why not make them the same amount of kills?
Obviously this is all my opinion, and debate should follow below. Until then, I shall be off-it is England over here in England and it is late. I bid you farewells, my youngers and elders. To the Samirichamber!
Log in to comment