And even if there was a 2nd gunman (the evidence for this seems flimsy at best) what does that change about Breivik's intentions? He was a rightist going after what he believed to be "marxists" (the Labour Party is social democratic at most).
His manifesto doesn't just highlight his hatred of marxists, he makes deliberate allusions and in fact of his hatred seems to be reserved for immigration policies in Europe and specifically towards Muslims. Effectively he believed European governments were being "culturally marxist", not just economically.
There were already credible belief that the camp he shot down, was pro-Palestinian and this may also have had angered him. Again if his manifesto and profile as being constructed by the MSM is true, he was a hardline Christian Zionist (something which people are very sensitive to touch upon), which may have impacted upon his actions.
I still struggle to understand why a man who hated Muslims so much, would not just shoot down Muslims, or at least attempt to carry out an attack on a Mosque? A large Central Oslo Mosque at that. Surely he could easily have added that target to govt building target?
Log in to comment