General forum question: Does a thread already having a lot of responses deter you from responding yourself??

#1 Posted by Bruce (5263 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
#2 Edited by Bruce (5263 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

The question was worded poorly, sorry; it's really late. 
 
Anyway,  
 
I was thinking about this a bit (bored with reading my assigned English reading) and I noticed that I am less likely to respond to a thread in a serious, thought-out manner if it already has a ton of posts. Reason being: I just don't feel like typing a HUGE load of text considering that (A) Most people won't read past the first page to begin with; and (B) Someone will have already said my sentiment but maybe in a different phrasing. 
 
I don't know, what do you guys and gals think?

#3 Posted by HatKing (4436 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Yes it does.  If it is a discussion where somebody has a lengthy post and there seems to be several lengthy responses I feel weird joining in.  My rule of thumb is if a thread is more than 2 pages I don't join in, unless it is something silly like the "Bombcast Watitng Room".
#4 Posted by Synthballs (2191 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
#5 Posted by VisariLoyalist (2988 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

well there is a feeling that you're late to the party

#6 Posted by ApertureSilence (1151 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Most of my forum posts are just sarcastic quips, so the longer a thread is, the less relevant they seem. It also becomes increasingly likely that somewhere, buried within the many pages of conversation that I am not going to bother reading, someone else already made the same comment. 
 
So yeah... if the thread is too long I generally don't bother.

#7 Posted by HatKing (4436 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
@Synthballs said:
"

Usually by then there is already a conversation going and people will just overlook my own comment for someone who has already established an argument.


Speaking of which, have you seen this? So terribly scared of posting in here anymore.  

"

Good example.  I wanted to discuss the end of the game but by the time I beat it that thread was already pushing 4 or 5 pages... I decided to keep to myself.
#8 Posted by MasterOfPenguins_Zell (2093 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

I feel exactly the same way. I especially hate doing it when I look through a thread and see after 30-60 posts nobody answered their question, and I do and nobody seems to care. I've written quite a few detailed explanations of various things only to have them looked over, and the topic--which could have been easily ended if they had only read my response--continues.

#9 Posted by Mariek430 (406 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
@Bruce: I'm the exact same way. Would waste time going through all the comments to see if someone had already posted my same feelings/thoughts on the subject.
#10 Posted by Bruce (5263 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
@MasterOfPenguins_Zell:  
 
Yeah, I get annoyed sometimes when people gloss over the obvious wit of some of the users here in favor of comment on a stupid fucking Lulcatz picture or some other dumb bullshit from 4Chan.
#11 Posted by MasterOfPenguins_Zell (2093 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
@Bruce: Exactly. It's like, I answered your questions, the reason you made this thread, and I'm just completely ignored.
 
I'm just glad I'm not the only one. lol
#12 Posted by Red12b (8869 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

 

 

Sometimes, kinda depends on the thread in question, If it is something like the Photoshop thread, then I will acknowledge the work of others with a reply,

 
If it is in a thread that I have posted in and I get an @ reply then depending on the age of said thread, or the nature of my reply (Ie: personal or off topic) I will either reply back through the Automated PM that is sent, or I will do an @ reply back to them.  
 
If it is a thread that I created, then I will answer back or supply more Info as the thread goes on, But I will not "Bump" said thread without actual content that it needs,  
 
If it is a massive thread like some of the ones that we get when there is a ruckus, depending on the weight of the subject at hand, and how I feel about said topic, then I will either contribute my 2 cents, or go back and read some of the responses,  
 
I usually skim through these types of topics anyway, reading the post's of people I recognize or people that I respect and follow and if I find something that I would like to discuss I will quote and continue that.

   



 
 
 
  

#13 Posted by HaltIamReptar (2027 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

It's going to be crazy-meta when this thread gets to three pages and people are too intimidated to do anything else than vote.

#14 Posted by Red12b (8869 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

@HaltlamReptar  
Haha, too true, 
 
Another thing that I forgot to mention, I get annoyed when people who's post's I like to read change their damn Avatar, As that is how I recognize Users.

#15 Posted by Arzen (77 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

This thread was almost too long for me to respond to without feeling lost in the sea of replies.  Glad to see I'm not alone.

#16 Posted by Skald (4366 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

If it gets too long, I usually drop some @s and quotes to get a response. 
 
However, if it gets too long, it's usually because someone said something somewhat religious in nature, and everyone has to lump all theists together and denounce them, and there is absolutely no merit to doing that, especially not here.

#17 Posted by Gunner612 (4338 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Yeah, im sure that my opinion has already been stated in a huge thread. Unless i'm in the middle of a debate of some sort, i dont bother with threads that have been posted in over 100 times.

#18 Posted by Bruce (5263 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago
@HaltIamReptar:  
 
I always read every post of my own threads, so at least I'm working on it!
#19 Posted by DJL (202 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Yeah, I'm just too lazy to scroll through multiple posts on multiple pages.  

#20 Posted by Xeiphyer (5166 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Yeah it totally does, why waste time if I know nobody will ever read it.

#21 Posted by JJOR64 (18221 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

No.  I like to share my own opinion on the subject.

#22 Posted by Sinatra (213 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

At times it does but most of the time I do not pay attention to the number of posts it got.

#23 Posted by natetodamax (18954 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

No way.

#24 Posted by Yummylee (18305 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Maybe just to leave some random comment, but getting into the discussion, nah for the same reasons you listed.
#25 Posted by oldschool (7265 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

I figure once a thread has a few pages already, most of what is worthwhile saying has already been said.  Consequently a few threads that have had a lot of traffic by the time I log in, which I have an interest in, I will still give a miss.

#26 Posted by Ghostiet (4822 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Yeah, because most of the time my post will be ignored, and sometimes I don't have the patience to read the whole topic, especially when it's a very tidbitty topic like that about Assassin's Creed 2 ending.

By the way, I smell that this thread will be long. And that would be fucking ironic.

#27 Posted by Gamer_152 (13341 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

When I go into a thread I usually feel the need to read all the posts in that thread, both to make sure I'm not repeating something that has already been said and also to see if there are any particularly relevant responses I may want to know about before replying myself. Usually when the thread is longer I know that reading through that entire thread will take me a fair amount of time and so I may leave the thread and come back to it later, but in a few cases it has meant that I've refrained from posting at all.

Moderator
#28 Posted by c1337us (5751 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

No, if I have something to say I'll still say it. I look forward to posting in this thread again when it's like 20 pages long.

#29 Posted by Lydian_Sel (2275 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Usually not, but it tends to depend on the nature of the thread. If a lot of people have already expressed the opinion I'm going to post then there's not much point.

#30 Posted by Meltac (1895 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Nope, I don't. If I have something to contribute with, I will. Of course it also depends on what the thread is about, but if it's something serious, I will still write what I have to say.

#31 Posted by Cynthesize (20 posts) - 3 years, 4 months ago

Eh, it depends: if it's a long thread and there's an actual discussion going on then yeah it deters me, but other than that no. Though then I usually keep an eye on the thread until I feel I can join in without wedging myself in the middle of something I'm oblivious about. 
#32 Posted by insouciant (654 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yeah, it does discourage me because I want to read what was said before I make a comment. 
 
Also, as a rule of thumb if a thread has over 300 replies, it's pretty stupid: Life of a Gay Gamer.
#33 Posted by EpicSteve (6167 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yes. A lot fo us on GiantBomb share a similar mind set, thus a lot of opinions are just said over and over. 

#34 Posted by Chavtheworld (4268 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

This thread has far too many posts for me to feel comfortable joining in.

#35 Posted by Toxin066 (3074 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

If this thread exceeds 3+ pages will people still respond?
 
I find myself steering away from threads with a lot of discussion because I feel at some point, someone has already said what I was going to. And I don't want to be that guy.

#36 Edited by MattyFTM (13867 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

It doesn't really deter me from posting if I have something new to bring to the discussion, or I feel a point made earlier needs reiterating, but generally in a long thread the point I would be making has already been talked about to death, so there is often not a huge necessity for me to post in larger threads.

Moderator
#37 Posted by Everyones_A_Critic (6089 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Someone has usually said what I plan on saying by the time I find the thread, so rather than making it even longer by repeating what's been said I usually just stay away.

#38 Posted by harris (847 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yeah, it sort of does. I feel like no one will read my post if it's lost in a massive thread, so significantly less people would end up seeing it. I guess this may be an irrational approach, but deep down it often prevents me from posting. 

#39 Posted by crusader8463 (13172 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

This thread is already at that tldnr point. For all the reasons posted before i usually don't bother posting in threads more than 3-4 pages in. However i have discovered a morbid interest in reading locked threads. When ever i see a thread was locked i immediately open it, go to the last post to see what comment the MOD posted as to why they locked it, and if it is something interesting i have to go back and see how the thread ended up there. It's like the internet equivalent to a car crash. You know its ugly but you just cant look away.

#40 Posted by FLStyle (3759 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago
@crusader8463 said:
" This thread is already at that tldnr point. "
Which is exactly why I'm going to say that I agree with OP and leave it at that.
#41 Posted by ImperiousRix (2933 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

No.  It's more the date on the thread that deters me.  If it's more than a month old, I usually won't comment on it, simply because I know that it probably won't get many more visitors. 
I do sometimes break this rule, however.

#42 Posted by BrendenDonaher (88 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

yep...

#43 Posted by Demonstride (865 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yes because I don't normally want to post something someone already said, and I don't want to read through so much stuff that by the time I am done its like 3 hours later.

#44 Posted by iam3green (14380 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

yes, but i feel stupid when everyone has a big wall of text and i just have a sentence.

#45 Posted by CL60 (16906 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Sometimes.

#46 Posted by Tactical_Kill (1686 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yes, because someone was probably said the same thing I would have said, so it seems kinda pointless.

#47 Posted by Whisperkill (2969 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

not from posting my opinion. But at that point I know nobody will read my post, so kind of

#48 Posted by teh_destroyer (3506 posts) - 3 years, 3 months ago

Yes, because if its an argument to intense for my taste, i will get bored of it,  but some of those threads are really entertaining.

Please Log In