I don't know know about you, but I am sort of morally apposed to them and have yet to shell out $8 just to be dissapointed. Everything about 3D is so forced and obvious. It's like ooo lets throw some stuff at the screen, then wait look over there *as arm goes into screen*. It seems to blatently obvious, it just seems like it would ruin the movie.
I guess I bring this up because apparently the new Resident Evil: Afterlife movie is to be shot entirely in 3D. Now I know the movies aren't spectacular by any stretch of the imagination, but I always found them to be at least entertaining, and well, I like the franchise. So now that the new one is 3D is sort of turns me off. How about you? Are any that you've seen as of lately any good?
Have you seen a 3D movie yet?
It's always better when its not so in your face, the last thing I want is Brendan fucking fraser jumping into my face every two minutes, Beowulf did it really well but films like coraline and nightmare before christmas use it sparingly and to great effect. My blood valentine was ridiculous though and I guess thats kind of the point.
You haven't seen Coraline then. It's one of the few 3d movies that actually does it well." I don't know know about you, but I am sort of morally apposed to them and have yet to shell out $8 just to be dissapointed. Everything about 3D is so forced and obvious. It's like ooo lets throw some stuff at the screen, then wait look over there *as arm goes into screen*. It seems to blatently obvious, it just seems like it would ruin the movie. I guess I bring this up because apparently the new Resident Evil: Afterlife movie is to be shot entirely in 3D. Now I know the movies aren't spectacular by any stretch of the imagination, but I always found them to be at least entertaining, and well, I like the franchise. So now that the new one is 3D is sort of turns me off. How about you? Are any that you've seen as of lately any good? "
For one thing, the 3d uses polarized glasses, rather than the anaglyph red-blue stereo glasses (at least in some theaters). That makes the picture look far better. It also does NOT shove it in your face. The effect is quite subtle, and simply gives everything a bit more depth.
I don't know if it's still showing in your area, in 3d, but if it is, you should go see it. You won't be able to get the experience again (unless you have a 3d capable TV/monitor, that is, one that can refresh at 120 Hz, you can't watch it in polarized 3d, only anaglyph).
Other than that though, yes, you are right. 3d is far more often abused.
I saw Up in 3D, which only used the effect in subtle ways (save for a few action scenes).
I just think it's going to take some time before directors learn how to use the technology as something more than a gimmick. I'm excited to see how James Cameron uses it in Avatar, and how Tim Burton will use it in Alice in Wonderland.
"I don't know know about you, but I am sort of morally apposed to them and have yet to shell out $8 just to be dissapointed. Everything about 3D is so forced and obvious. It's like ooo lets throw some stuff at the screen, then wait look over there *as arm goes into screen*. It seems to blatently obvious, it just seems like it would ruin the movie. I guess I bring this up because apparently the new Resident Evil: Afterlife movie is to be shot entirely in 3D. Now I know the movies aren't spectacular by any stretch of the imagination, but I always found them to be at least entertaining, and well, I like the franchise. So now that the new one is 3D is sort of turns me off. How about you? Are any that you've seen as of lately any good? "
I cant stand 3-D either.
I have seen all the 3D stuff at Disneyworld, also Beowulf, Nightmare Before Christmas 3D and Coraline.
I love it. What I found irritating, though, is that apparently some theatres still use shutter glasses, and these suck. Beowulf and Nightmabre Before Christmas was perfect 3D with very pleasant, light glasses and I went to see Coraline expecting the same, but we got heavy shutter glasses which were both uncomfortable AND ruined the effect as it just doesn't work with quick movements.
There are no over-the-top "look, we are 3D!" effects in Coraline.Everything about 3D is so forced and obvious. It's like ooo lets throw some stuff at the screen, then wait look over there *as arm goes into screen*. It seems to blatently obvious, it just seems like it would ruin the movie.
I saw My Bloody Valentine 3D and The Final Destination. The first was amazing, the latter was ridiculously tame but I'm still undecided on the topic because while I think 3D is pointless, I am still really looking forward to Avatar and all the PIXAR stuff coming out on this side of the Atlantic soon.
Up in 3-d. unfortunate, because it kinda marred the beauty of it and it seemed a heckuva lot choppier then it actually was.
As some people have pointed out, there's different ways that 3D is being used right now:
1. the traditional, in-your-face, here comes an explosion so let's throw a bunch of shit in your face, way (My bloody valentine, the final destination)
and
2. The way they use it with modern CGI movies. Up in 3D, Monsters Vs. Aliens in 3D, Coraline (although originally made with figures and 3D was later tackked on) all used the 3D in a really tasteful manner. The effect, when done right, is one that mimics a hologram being shown on screen at all times. Up was a prime example of this. Watching it in 3D is essentially equivalent with watching a movie in hologram mode.
I saw the Final Destination in 3d, that was pretty good. I think 3D is just a gimmick to get you to pay more and to stop people videoing it on a handycam.
"I think 3D is just a gimmick to get you to pay more and to stop people videoing it on a handycam. "That is actually all it's for in 99% of the cases.
i have NEVER seen a 3D movie with the glasses.. came real close to it at Disney Land in Paris but we got out before the movie started
" I never saw a 3D movie. I will someday when it willl be done properly. "December 18th 2009.
Not counting Captain EO at EPCOT in the mid 80s, the last 3D movie I saw in theaters was Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone starring Peter Strauss, and very young Molly Ringwald, Ernie Hudson and (Sam Fisher?!) Michael Ironside. That was in 1983! I haven't seen one since (except for EO).
Also
@Claude: Whats "Batman The Dark Night"? its just "The Dark Knight" Yes, I had to point that out since I'm a dick.
" Yes, and its retarded(sorry), dont really see the benifit of having 3D other then the movie looking like shit(no I'm not talking about the red and blue glasses 3D but the new type of 3D, still looks like shit)Whoops, my bad. You're not a dick, you're just right.
Also
@Claude: Whats "Batman The Dark Night"? its just "The Dark Knight" Yes, I had to point that out since I'm a dick. "
" @The_Dude said:Coraline was really well done, it was not IN YOUR FACE with all the 3D. It simply did its job with adding depth to the scene." I've seen a few, I thought Beowulf and Coraline were decent in 3D. "Yeah, I thought Coraline was good. That's actually the only movie I've seen in 3D. "
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment