Highly acclaimed movies that you dislike

Hiya, Bombers! Just wondering if you guys (and gals) had any movies that you hate (or feel indifferent towards) despite their high acclaim.  
 
Just a few of mine:  

• Lost in Translation- Not a bad movie, not by any stretch of the imagination. 
• Collateral- I don't like Jamie Foxx, and I didn't particularly like Tom Cruise in this movie either. 
• Brokeback Mountain- I can't place my finger on the reason for my ambivalence towards this movie. I just don't digg it as much as other people.

No Country for Old Men. 
There Will Be Blood. 
Burn After Reading. 
 
I remember when these movies all started to come out and everyone loved them. 

Bladerunner

Avatar- it sucked.
Kill Bill- it sucked. hard. most anything from Quentin Tarantino is just god awful.
The Hurt Locker- i think people just wanted to like it so they could associate and feel bad for the real soldiers.  

The French Connection--just didn't agree with me 
Burton's Alice in Wonderland--Critics hated it, audiences loved it, I thought it was fucking horrible.  
3:10 to Yuma (remake)--not sure what didn't grab me, but I didn't exactly hate it either.

" No Country for Old Men. There Will Be Blood. Burn After Reading.  I remember when these movies all started to come out and everyone loved them.  "

The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Star Wars: A New Hope and Return of the Jedi.

Lost in Translation- Not a bad movie, not by any stretch of the imagination. 

 Garden State.  - I was pretty surprised at just what an amateur effort this was given the praise surrounding it at release and the comparisons to the brilliant Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. The direction is filled with comically bad symbolism, with Zach Braff waking up near the start in an entirely white room to show how plain his life is, which happens right after a dream scene where he sits motionless as a plane crashes, and another where he has a shirt that matches the pattern of the wallpaper to show how he fits into the background; pointless use of slow-mo and scores of irritating shots of Braff just starring into the camera to beat you over the head telling you how miserable he is. The writing is dire, with Natalie Portman's character coming off as entirely false -- quirky for the sake of being so rather than a natural character -- and the number of lines of dialogue that will make you cringe is rather high. Some samples of the profundity you can expect: "listen to this song by the shins it'll totally change your life", "This isn't a fullstop, it's an ellipsis"   and "Good luck exploring the infinite abyss.", "You too". 

I hate everyone.

Juno

I'd say that my top choice would be 2001.  It's alternatingly boring and opaque.  I would sooner watch the workmanlike mundanity that is 2011 over 2001 any day.   Not a huge fan of Kubrick in general.  While I like Full Metal Jacket (despite Modine) and give Dr. Strangelove the respect it deserves, my admiration for those movies is overshadowed for my disdain for A Clockwork Orange and Paths of Glory, which I hate much more than 2001 for the simplistic morality of their characters.  I don't feel they're as universally acclaimed, though.

There Will Be Blood, Kill Bill vol. 1 & 2.

Shouldn't this be on Screened? Oh well.  
 
Rocky Horror Picture Show. 

Old Boy

I'm so gonna be hated.
 
I've never liked Gladiator

The Boondock Saints. I know it wasn't a hit with the critics, but everyone and their mother fuckin loves it over here in Boston. The first time I saw it I didn't mind it, but I just grew to hate what it stood for. Killing in the name of religion is OK as long as you're behind a cross. Fuck that.

Avatar and Inception... waste of my time... 

" @HandsomeDead: Even George Clooney?^^ "

No Country for Old Men 
 
And I have some kind of issue with classics like Bladerunner and Apocalypse Now... mainly that the versions you are able to get hold of today are extended Directors Cut versions. 
Both movies appeal to me... but their are just to damn long. I feel I would have liked the original versions. 
 
I think this holds true for most movies... Things cut from the original version were most likely justified.

@JTB123 said:

" I don't see what the big deal is with District  9, it had some good ideas, but it seemed to be more concerned with being as gross as it possiblt could instead of focusing on those ideas.   "

District 9 was an Alien Nation rip off. I didn't care for it either.  
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Too-Close-To-Call-10-Ways-District-9-Is-An-Alien-Nation-Knockoff-14310.html

There are a lot of highly popular films that I may not like or have very little interest in, but truly the only movie that I have zero love for and is probably the WORST film I have ever set completely through was Avatar. I can accept when a film just isn't my speed for whatever reason, but god damn! that movie was fucking junk. The dialogue was so fucking bad that it was even funny bad. Also, all the stupid human mech and hover craft stuff looked like they were designed in the 80's or left over's from Cameron's Aliens film. 
 
I wasn't even going in ready to hate Avatar...I was willing to give it try no matter how much I feel James Cameron is a complete jack ass. I was actually quite surpised it was as bad as it was, as James Cameron, with T 1, T2, and True Lies, has shown he can make competent to great action films. Completely baffling how bad that movie was.

" @Burns098356GX:  To appreciate Tarantino you have to be a movie expert, you have no idea whats going on behind every shot... every line... he is the best director out there today... he has a unique spirit in his movies. Kill Bill is more than it seems, especially the first one.  "

I'm going to throw in 2001. I just didn't get it. The only segments that I found remotely interesting were the HAL scenes, because you know, they actually made fucking sense. It just came off as so artsy and smug. I feel like people cite it as a great movie just because it has Kubrick's name on it.

The Hurt Locker & Slumdog Millionaire are pretty good movies, but both received way too much praise. But the movies that I initially go to from this question are:
Lord of the Rings: stopped after the 1st one simply b/c of all the boring ass back story and step up - over 2 hours worth
Glengarry Glen Ross - all those great actors and zero interesting things going on
Blade Runner -watched it friends, keep watching for the amazing stuff to happen. it never did. (But this is the only movie I'm hell bent on seeing again just to figure out what it is I am missing about it)
 
And #1 Mystic River - An amazing movie if you only watch the 1st 70%. Then it turns into the biggest pile of shit I have ever seen. Anyone liked it completely ignored the completely horrific ending.

" Shouldn't this be on Screened?"

Man, people really hate movies here.
 
Also, I'll say this concering Kill Bill: I fucking hated it for the longest time, but recently watched both back to back. It worked far better than I ever remembered it doing, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Maybe some of you peeps should try the same.

" The Korean movie 'Old Boy' .. Never understood why people liked it so much.

Zodiac

Crash, Avatar, There Will Be Blood

" Crash, Avatar, There Will Be Blood "