Okay duder, this is the best advice I'll ever give on these boards: do NOT do it on human augmentation. Trust me, I'm on my second year of a sociology degree, 4.1 GPA. You'll most likely end up writing a humanities paper, and that's not good. At all. Remember that the fundamental concept of Sociology is the study of the creation of external social facts (Durkheim) through human interactions (Weber) and the ensuing coercion of individuals by society; or as Berger put it, ''we live in the prison whose walls we erected ourselves''.
I have a hard time understanding how you'll fit human augmentation in there. Tip no. 2: I know everyone here had good intentions, but man don't ask random people for sound sociological advice. Considering how everyone is part of society, we all think of ourselves as amateur sociologists... If that was the case we'd all be out a job. Tell me which authors you saw in class and I'll try to think of something. Which texts would be even better.
Sheesh, I feel like I just defused a ticking bomb.
EDIT: I just read the whole topic and apparently a teacher got you a good angle to approach the subject. Nevermind me then --though I'm still skeptical about the augmentation part since sociologists rarely analyze immediate issues, much less futuristic. Stigmatization of people requiring prostheses seems perfect. Sigh, I wish we could have this conversation in French, my translations feel gibberish.
Log in to comment