I just discovered a massive plothole in Terminator 2!

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Jay444111

For the past few years I have felt something wrong was with this movie. It was just so awesome yet I still felt there was something completely and massively wrong with it. You see, I am one of the folks that does believe that the first two movies are canon while the other two... never existed. However the more I think about it, the more I think on how fucked the timeline is!

You see, I got a simple thing here to explain.

1. Kyle goes back in time, goes to town with Sarah Conner and John Conner is born.

2. John Conner grows up into a kid, gets hunted and a T-800 and his mom team up.

3. John is able to throw every piece of future technology in the lava chamber. (I don't care if it is called a smelter! It has a fucking lava lake!)

These solutions make it so this happens with every point.

1. With no future war, Kyle either may not exist anymore, or does but can't go back in time to do Sarah Conner to create John Conner.

2. John would cease existence as soon as he threw that technology in the lava lake due to PARADOX!!!

3. John Ceases to exist and is removed from reality just as Kyle is. The future war never happens and everyone lives a happy life without death machines.

So yeah. John should CEASE existence upon throwing that shit in the lava lake! I have tried to reason on how it CAN'T have happened... or that reality just... doesn't seem to care that he exists...

Isn't it obvious! You're your own Grandpa!!!
Isn't it obvious! You're your own Grandpa!!!

Hell... the Futurama paradox works BETTER than the Terminator 2 one. This basically means that as long as John exists, he will cause a machine war to happen just because he exists!

Well isn't that a good fucking ending!

However, there is one theory which may explain this plothole and completely ignore the crappy 3 and fourth movies!

Multiverse theory!

The basic theory is that in one universe you choose one thing, while in another you choose another! This happens and infinite number of times, creating practically endless amounts of other universes. Many the same as your and many not the same at all.

Here is a basic sketch of the two timelines in which things diverged in this series!

Terminator 1 is the black line.

Terminator 2 is the red one.

Terminator 3 is purple.

and Terminator 4 is Blue.

While the time when Kyle goes back in time at the end is Black once more.

GE stands for Good Ending of Terminator 2.
GE stands for Good Ending of Terminator 2.

Basically, Kyle proves multiverse theory correct while also saving his own timeline. Since John Conner was born after he arrived, that means two things, ONE, this moment in time just split into another universe completely while with the multiverse theory creates a future that is much like his.

My brain is officially hurting... but hey, that is the nature of Multiverse theory.

But yes, Kyle just created himself and destroyed himself with a SINGLE act... So, quite literally, he sexed divided zero... That is funny and scary as hell.

So yeah, this means that Kyle went back into his own universe and created two/more of them in one action... Damn... This series just got Kingdom Hearts level confusing...

So yeah, either the Terminator Universe has a multiverse theory or it is a major fucking plot hole the size of Montana!

What do you guys think of this?

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By JasonR86

@Jay444111:

I think you're thinking too much about Terminator and its story.

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12781

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#3  Edited By MooseyMcMan

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

Avatar image for mrklorox
MrKlorox

11220

Forum Posts

1071

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By MrKlorox
@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

Basically this. Every piece of time travel fiction has its own set of rules and always seems to break them.
Avatar image for jeanluc
jeanluc

4057

Forum Posts

7939

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 13

#5  Edited By jeanluc  Staff

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Avatar image for sambambo
Sambambo

3173

Forum Posts

1009

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#6  Edited By Sambambo

Imagine what you could do if you spent your many empty hours thinking of something useful.

Avatar image for tormasturba
TorMasturba

1123

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By TorMasturba

Yeah but the way they explained it away was to say that even if destroying the T-800 tech gets smelted it only pushes the rise of the machines back, not stops it from happening, ie: kyle is still sent back in time, he's just a couple years older.

Avatar image for bed
bed

12934

Forum Posts

14417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 24

#8  Edited By bed

@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

this should be the bullet in the head of every time travel thread

Avatar image for dagbiker
Dagbiker

7057

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

#9  Edited By Dagbiker

Da ja vue did time travel like i like to think it works, but usualy when its done like that its not a intresting story. because there is no danger of people messing up the time stream, because, like they say on lost "What happened happened".

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Jay444111

@TorMasturba said:

Yeah but the way they explained it away was to say that even if destroying the T-800 tech gets smelted it only pushes the rise of the machines back, not stops it from happening, ie: kyle is still sent back in time, he's just a couple years older.

However there IS a good ending to Terminator 2. (Only with... weirdly enough, DVD cheats... not joking.) Where Sarah Conner grows old and John grows up and haves some kids and the war never happened...

So yeah... I would far rather go with that then the two other movies. With my theory though, BOTH of them happened!

Avatar image for meierthered
MeierTheRed

6084

Forum Posts

1701

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By MeierTheRed

@TorMasturba said:

Yeah but the way they explained it away was to say that even if destroying the T-800 tech gets smelted it only pushes the rise of the machines back, not stops it from happening, ie: kyle is still sent back in time, he's just a couple years older.

I even remember them saying in T3, that there is no escaping Skynet going online, it will happen no matter what.

Avatar image for landon
landon

4138

Forum Posts

263

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#12  Edited By landon

You can look at this in two ways.

1: Time moves in a straight line, meaning, they didn't save the fufure. If John Connor is still continuing to exist, then that means that destroying Skynet wasn't the final nail in the coffin, which I think is the plot to Terminator 3 (never saw it so dont quote me on that)

2: They created an alternate timeline. John Connor is already born, his father may not exist yet but it doesn't matter because time moves like an ocean and he did exist at one point, which is all that matters in the circle of life.

Avatar image for video_game_king
Video_Game_King

36563

Forum Posts

59080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 14

#13  Edited By Video_Game_King

@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

So we're all frozen in time?

Avatar image for thesoutherndandy
TheSouthernDandy

4157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By TheSouthernDandy

Time travel dog.

Time travel.

Avatar image for brendan
Brendan

9414

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#15  Edited By Brendan

@AjayRaz said:

@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

this should be the bullet in the head of every time travel thread

Substitute "time travel" for "zombie apocalypse" and "zombies" and you have another perfect statement that I think about sometimes.

Avatar image for flaboere
Flaboere

386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By Flaboere

@Video_Game_King said:

@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

So we're all frozen in time?

How'd you get to that conclusion?

No, what he's saying is, that time travel where the traveler goes back to interfere in stuff that interferes with the time traveling is impossible, as it should be in Terminator.

Time travel is almost always stupid in movies, maybe except that one where the two dudes go into a box to travel back, and plan it really well.

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Jay444111

@Flaboere said:

@Video_Game_King said:

@MooseyMcMan said:

Time travel never makes sense when you think about it. It's because time travel is impossible, so there's no way to have it make logical sense.

So we're all frozen in time?

How'd you get to that conclusion?

No, what he's saying is, that time travel where the traveler goes back to interfere in stuff that interferes with the time traveling is impossible, as it should be in Terminator.

Time travel is almost always stupid in movies, maybe except that one where the two dudes go into a box to travel back, and plan it really well.

Or do a multiverse thing... then suddenly time travel doesn't seem as worth it anymore if it doesn't affect your timeline... Kinda like how in Legend of zelda. Link basically abandoned his original timeline to death and saved the future and the past!

Avatar image for video_game_king
Video_Game_King

36563

Forum Posts

59080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 14

#18  Edited By Video_Game_King

@Flaboere said:

How'd you get to that conclusion?

Our own forward movement through time.

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#19  Edited By TheHT

@pornstorestiffi said:

@TorMasturba said:

Yeah but the way they explained it away was to say that even if destroying the T-800 tech gets smelted it only pushes the rise of the machines back, not stops it from happening, ie: kyle is still sent back in time, he's just a couple years older.

I even remember them saying in T3, that there is no escaping Skynet going online, it will happen no matter what.

Que the Reapers.

Avatar image for akyho
Akyho

2130

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By Akyho

See that's why you have to include the next two films and the tv series. Since its basically says. No matter what you do the war comes. It just depends on how and when it happens.

Avatar image for spoonman671
Spoonman671

5874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By Spoonman671

Or what about how there shouldn't have been a Terminator 2 in the first place because Skynet was destroyed before Kyle Reese traveled back in time?

Avatar image for fattony12000
fattony12000

8491

Forum Posts

22398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#22  Edited By fattony12000
Avatar image for flstyle
FLStyle

6883

Forum Posts

40152

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 17

#23  Edited By FLStyle

@Jay444111: Please stop misspelling Connor, you've got doing it as well now, thanks.

EDIT: Also this.

And there you have it, time explained by The Doctor himself.

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By Jay444111

@Spoonman671 said:

Or what about how there shouldn't have been a Terminator 2 in the first place because Skynet was destroyed before Kyle Reese traveled back in time?

Wait... wut...

Okay my brain imploded a bit and had to think on this one. But there IS a deleted scene at the end of Terminator 1 which shows the factory that the original Terminator was killed in WAS Cyberdyne... the company that made Skynet. So yeah... I think I solved that one... maybe... I think.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16684

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

#25  Edited By Justin258

Well, your problem is that you completely discount the third and fourth movies, which while not masterpieces aren't bad either. They wrapped up your plot hole in the third one ("You only postponed it").

Still, I can't berate you much for discounting something as canon. I have a strong dislike of the movie that wrapped up the original Full Metal Alchemist anime and I try to forget that it happened.

Avatar image for liquidus
Liquidus

993

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#26  Edited By Liquidus

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Yeah, if you can possibly make sense of that movie.

Avatar image for privateirontfu
PrivateIronTFU

3858

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#27  Edited By PrivateIronTFU

@Liquidus said:

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Yeah, if you can possibly make sense of that movie.

Ugh. That movie would have been so much better if those actors could, ya know, actually act. The plot was interesting, but everybody in it was terrible.

Avatar image for ramone
Ramone

3210

Forum Posts

364

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#28  Edited By Ramone

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Fuck that movie. I watched it once and I felt my brain crying out in pain. I should probably watch it again just to see if I can make any sense of it.

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By Jay444111

@believer258 said:

Well, your problem is that you completely discount the third and fourth movies, which while not masterpieces aren't bad either. They wrapped up your plot hole in the third one ("You only postponed it").

Still, I can't berate you much for discounting something as canon. I have a strong dislike of the movie that wrapped up the original Full Metal Alchemist anime and I try to forget that it happened.

I have to admit, I liked that movie... sure it isn't perfect and it seems to have tried to create some other new series where Ed and Al fight nazis or something but I still liked it... However Brotherhood is kick ass! Love that show more than the original IMO at least.

Also, I think that the Terminator series HAS to follow a multiversal timeline, heck there is a hidden ending IN T2 which is a damn good ending while the other one creates a damn apocalypse!

Avatar image for liquidus
Liquidus

993

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#30  Edited By Liquidus

@PrivateIronTFU said:

@Liquidus said:

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Yeah, if you can possibly make sense of that movie.

Ugh. That movie would have been so much better if those actors could, ya know, actually act. The plot was interesting, but everybody in it was terrible.

Right, as oppose to talk about complicated things in complicated terms and stand around with ties and shirts and look smart. Agreed.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d7bd9e4bef30
deactivated-5d7bd9e4bef30

4741

Forum Posts

128

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

I love that film. It really sent my mind for a loop.

Avatar image for privateirontfu
PrivateIronTFU

3858

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#32  Edited By PrivateIronTFU

@Liquidus said:

@PrivateIronTFU said:

@Liquidus said:

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Yeah, if you can possibly make sense of that movie.

Ugh. That movie would have been so much better if those actors could, ya know, actually act. The plot was interesting, but everybody in it was terrible.

Right, as oppose to talk about complicated things in complicated terms and stand around with ties and shirts and look smart. Agreed.

What?

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16684

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

#33  Edited By Justin258

@Jay444111 said:

@believer258 said:

Well, your problem is that you completely discount the third and fourth movies, which while not masterpieces aren't bad either. They wrapped up your plot hole in the third one ("You only postponed it").

Still, I can't berate you much for discounting something as canon. I have a strong dislike of the movie that wrapped up the original Full Metal Alchemist anime and I try to forget that it happened.

I have to admit, I liked that movie... sure it isn't perfect and it seems to have tried to create some other new series where Ed and Al fight nazis or something but I still liked it... However Brotherhood is kick ass! Love that show more than the original IMO at least.

Also, I think that the Terminator series HAS to follow a multiversal timeline, heck there is a hidden ending IN T2 which is a damn good ending while the other one creates a damn apocalypse!

Wait, what? As far as I know, there's only one ending to Terminator 2, and it's not apocalyptic. Unless you're talking about this one, which I believe is officially non-canon or was made officially non-canon by the release of T3.

Avatar image for liquidus
Liquidus

993

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#34  Edited By Liquidus

@PrivateIronTFU said:

@Liquidus said:

@PrivateIronTFU said:

@Liquidus said:

@JeanLuc said:

@MrKlorox: The closest I've seen to sticking to their rules is Primer.

Yeah, if you can possibly make sense of that movie.

Ugh. That movie would have been so much better if those actors could, ya know, actually act. The plot was interesting, but everybody in it was terrible.

Right, as oppose to talk about complicated things in complicated terms and stand around with ties and shirts and look smart. Agreed.

What?

I wasn't being sarcastic...maybe, I should have made that more clear, sorry.

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By Jay444111

@believer258 said:

@Jay444111 said:

@believer258 said:

Well, your problem is that you completely discount the third and fourth movies, which while not masterpieces aren't bad either. They wrapped up your plot hole in the third one ("You only postponed it").

Still, I can't berate you much for discounting something as canon. I have a strong dislike of the movie that wrapped up the original Full Metal Alchemist anime and I try to forget that it happened.

I have to admit, I liked that movie... sure it isn't perfect and it seems to have tried to create some other new series where Ed and Al fight nazis or something but I still liked it... However Brotherhood is kick ass! Love that show more than the original IMO at least.

Also, I think that the Terminator series HAS to follow a multiversal timeline, heck there is a hidden ending IN T2 which is a damn good ending while the other one creates a damn apocalypse!

Wait, what? As far as I know, there's only one ending to Terminator 2, and it's not apocalyptic. Unless you're talking about this one, which I believe is officially non-canon or was made officially non-canon by the release of T3.

Lol... is it just me or is every post in this topic started with a 'wait wut' or is that just me seeing this.

Anyways. My version doesn't actually include that ending unless you put in a VERY specific cheat code. yes, My copy of T2 has a cheat code to unlock that ending... Very weird I know.

But I consider the ending just as canon as the two other movies... thanks to the multiverse theory literally fixing all the dang problems with this ending and with also creating the next two movies.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16684

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

#36  Edited By Justin258

@Jay444111 said:

@believer258 said:

@Jay444111 said:

@believer258 said:

Well, your problem is that you completely discount the third and fourth movies, which while not masterpieces aren't bad either. They wrapped up your plot hole in the third one ("You only postponed it").

Still, I can't berate you much for discounting something as canon. I have a strong dislike of the movie that wrapped up the original Full Metal Alchemist anime and I try to forget that it happened.

I have to admit, I liked that movie... sure it isn't perfect and it seems to have tried to create some other new series where Ed and Al fight nazis or something but I still liked it... However Brotherhood is kick ass! Love that show more than the original IMO at least.

Also, I think that the Terminator series HAS to follow a multiversal timeline, heck there is a hidden ending IN T2 which is a damn good ending while the other one creates a damn apocalypse!

Wait, what? As far as I know, there's only one ending to Terminator 2, and it's not apocalyptic. Unless you're talking about this one, which I believe is officially non-canon or was made officially non-canon by the release of T3.

Lol... is it just me or is every post in this topic started with a 'wait wut' or is that just me seeing this.

Anyways. My version doesn't actually include that ending unless you put in a VERY specific cheat code. yes, My copy of T2 has a cheat code to unlock that ending... Very weird I know.

But I consider the ending just as canon as the two other movies... thanks to the multiverse theory literally fixing all the dang problems with this ending and with also creating the next two movies.

Wait, what? Your DVD has a cheat code?

Dude, if the alternate ending is that well-hidden, then it wasn't meant to be canon at all in the first place. Just sayin'.

Avatar image for gravier251
Gravier251

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By Gravier251

Well, the terminator movies used conflicting takes on time travel, namely Predestination Paradox in Terminator 1 and Grandfather Paradox in terminator 2. (seems there are 2 topics today with me rambling about those theories, odd hehe).

Anyway, in Terminator 1 Skynet tried to prevent John Connor from being born, but that actually resulting in Kyle going back to prevent it, fathering John, etc. Esentially fulfilling how things had always been. John was born under those circumstances, always. Skynet merely fulfilled it's role in the set flow of time. John would grow up and eventually lead the resistance, etc.

Terminator 2 on the other hand goes the grandfather paradox route of having them trying to stop skynet from ever coming into being. They are shown to succeed, so spawn a parallel universe in which John is present despite all the factors that would cause him to even exist no longer being present.

Terminator 3 goes back to the roots with Terminator 1 and predestination. They essentially fail and get sealed away in a bunker. But there is a radio present, with a means of contact to various leaders which John will advise. Essentially implying that this is the way things have always been, and that the cause of John becoming the head of the resistance is because of his life till this point and being sealed in the bunker.

As for Terminator 4 i'm not sure, between screaming terminators and painful plot holes I just couldn't watch it all the way through.

Series as a whole though is a pretty canonical mess, to say nothing of the Sarah Connor Chronicles and it's myriad plotholes. Time travel makes for a messy narrative contrivance, especially if time is something that can be changed through time travel.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f899c29358e
deactivated-63f899c29358e

3175

Forum Posts

203

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

The story of any of the Terminator movies never made sense, as soon as you introduce time travel into a story, plotholes will appear and suspension of disbelief is king. Don't think about it, even Back to the Future gets kinda screwy with the plot in some spots because of the time travel.

Avatar image for ntm
NTM

12222

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By NTM

http://terminator.wikia.com/wiki/The_Terminator_timeline

I don't think it's so much as fucked up as it is interesting. There's not really anything in it that's fucked up, it's just unexplained. I don't think it can be explained. I mean, what would have to happen first, the future where John sends back Kyle, or the past where Kyle impregnates Sarah to give birth to the future resistance leader (which is as we know it, John Conner)? There's no alternate universe that it started out with another father, it's always Kyle Reese sent back in time, but what are the alternatives? That's left up to the viewer to think of.

Avatar image for contrarian
Contrarian

1205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By Contrarian

Time is a loop. Whatever you do to the timeline becomes the timeline. Whatever you do is what you were going to do anyway, nothing changes. It is not variable. You can't change time.

How do I know this? I am from the future, along with all my Australian and New Zealand friends. It is Sunday and I am feeling fine.

Avatar image for hunkulese
Hunkulese

4225

Forum Posts

310

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By Hunkulese

Any story with time travel can't stand up if you analyze it. Multiple universes and timelines is the easiest way to explain things but if you want to believe in a single timeline then you have to accept all four movies of having happened. The only way the first movies can happen is if there is a future war.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ba16609964d9
deactivated-5ba16609964d9

3361

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

If your wondering why John Conner still exist and other science facts.  Just remember it's a movie and you really should just relax.

Avatar image for jay444111
Jay444111

2638

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By Jay444111

@Village_Guy said:

The story of any of the Terminator movies never made sense, as soon as you introduce time travel into a story, plotholes will appear and suspension of disbelief is king. Don't think about it, even Back to the Future gets kinda screwy with the plot in some spots because of the time travel.

That is true... in the third movie there are TWO deloreans stuck in the past. They could have easily fixed the delorean with the other and just include a list of part/stuff in order to make parts later on... So yeah... they could have prevented that train shit if they were willing to dare time and paradox's!

Avatar image for jcgamer
JCGamer

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#45  Edited By JCGamer

And the fact that John Conner is supposed to be 10 years old in that movie.

Avatar image for dagbiker
Dagbiker

7057

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

#46  Edited By Dagbiker

@bartok said:

If your wondering why John Conner still exist and other science facts. Just remember it's a movie and you really should just relax.

Robot Rollcall?

Avatar image for iam3green
iam3green

14368

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By iam3green

i think you're looking at this the different way.

i never got into the show.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#48  Edited By MariachiMacabre
@Dagbiker

@bartok said:

If your wondering why John Conner still exist and other science facts. Just remember it's a movie and you really should just relax.

Robot Rollcall?

Cambot! Gypsy! Tom Servo! Croooooooow!