Jesus was not white!

  • 63 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

#51  Edited By jakob187
Willy105 said:
"Since when was Jesus white?

Who tells people this!?!

He isn't white. He's of Jewish decent!"
JESUS WAS A JEW?!?!?!  HOLY CRAP!!!!!
Avatar image for metalgearsunny
MetalGearSunny

7466

Forum Posts

13349

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#52  Edited By MetalGearSunny

What a thread.

Who cares? Are we really that raciest?

Avatar image for handsomedead
HandsomeDead

11853

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By HandsomeDead
Snail said:
"HandsomeDead said:
"I don't see what the problem of envisioning him as white is seeing as he's essentialy a fictional character anyway."
No, he is not. There is historical proof that he existed, whether he had or not holy powers is fictional stuff."
Hence my use of 'essentially'. He may have been a real person, but people only really know him because of his hocus pocus.
Avatar image for warofart
artofwar420

6994

Forum Posts

290

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 7

#54  Edited By artofwar420

It's not being racist, it's seeking the truth.

Avatar image for gunner
Gunner

4424

Forum Posts

248

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

#55  Edited By Gunner
jakob187 said:
"Willy105 said:
"Since when was Jesus white?

Who tells people this!?!

He isn't white. He's of Jewish decent!"
JESUS WAS A JEW?!?!?!  HOLY CRAP!!!!!"
i know! that totally blew me mind!

i kid.

I really dont care if there really was a guy named Jesus In Jerusalem who had 12 people who followed him. If there was, he was blown out of proportion, if there wasnt than there is even more reason why Christianity is a lie.
Avatar image for shadow2k6
Shadow2K6

421

Forum Posts

510

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 4

#56  Edited By Shadow2K6

Who really cares.  Also the whole idea of being "White" is just some idiotic ideology made up during the 1900s in the US.  Its called Caucasian which is made up of people from Europe, Middle East, North Africa, Central and South Asia.  Also just because your Caucasian doesn't mean your "White".  Since Jesus was from the middle east I think he fits the Caucasian description.

Avatar image for snail
Snail

8908

Forum Posts

16390

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#57  Edited By Snail
HandsomeDead said:
"Snail said:
"HandsomeDead said:
"I don't see what the problem of envisioning him as white is seeing as he's essentialy a fictional character anyway."
No, he is not. There is historical proof that he existed, whether he had or not holy powers is fictional stuff."
Hence my use of 'essentially'. He may have been a real person, but people only really know him because of his hocus pocus."
Oh, the use of the word essentially was vague...
Avatar image for diego
Diego

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58  Edited By Diego

who cares if he was black or white...

Avatar image for jesus
Jesus

1190

Forum Posts

104

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#59  Edited By Jesus

You sure about that.

Avatar image for colmustard
ColMustard

411

Forum Posts

237

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

#60  Edited By ColMustard

only albinos are white... you racist.

Avatar image for joey
joey

1067

Forum Posts

554

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By joey

He was dark white, AKA tan.

Avatar image for diz
diz

1394

Forum Posts

961

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

#62  Edited By diz

It is certainly no fact that the biblical Jesus actually existed. Any writings about him (and  there are suspiciously few from a culture that did engage in much other documentation) were written at least 20 years after his alledged death. Most testement is third hand (and therefore hear-say).

The earlist Roman accounts of his life have been called to scrutiny over early Christian additions to them. There were many people called Jesus who did live at the time (as tombs with remains confirm). The Jesus myth has far too much in common with earlier cultural beliefs and stories for me to believe.

Avatar image for adam_grif
adam_grif

1170

Forum Posts

383

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63  Edited By adam_grif
diz said:
"It is certainly no fact that the biblical Jesus actually existed. Any writings about him (and  there are suspiciously few from a culture that did engage in much other documentation) were written at least 20 years after his alledged death. Most testement is third hand (and therefore hear-say).
The earlist Roman accounts of his life have been called to scrutiny over early Christian additions to them. There were many people called Jesus who did live at the time (as tombs with remains confirm). The Jesus myth has far too much in common with earlier cultural beliefs and stories for me to believe.

"
The earliest recorded versions of the bible, such as those contained in the dead sea scrolls and the Codex Sinaticus do not contain any of the resurrection story. The more you know!
Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

The Jesus myth has far too much in common with earlier cultural beliefs and stories for me to believe.

That's fine, but it doesn't have any bearing on the factual existence of Jesus. You should avoid swinging that word around, it's dangerous. ;)

I assume that Jesus' movement was not nearly as big as the New Testament would have you believe, though it's really just speculation.