new reviews
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Edited By shawnj13
All of them are either extremely poorly written, or just plagiarized from Wikipedia. You are helping absolutely no one with your abysmal reviews.
Perhaps this was too mean. I think you should absolutely continue writing your reviews, only if you actually take your time with them. Your reviews offer no explanation of why the game is either good or bad, are poorly written, and you make too many mistakes. Also, ripping off wikipedia articles is completely ridiculous and not accepted on this site.
hey you guys i will be talking about a great game called skate 2
If we are looking at your review, we know you are gonna talk about Skate 2.
All he needs to do is read. Then write. Then read some more. Then write some more." @artofwar420: I agree. Instead of just saying that his reviews suck, we should offer more constructive criticism so he knows how to improve his writing. "
Find a couple of people who's writing you like, and then... just read. Feel their rhythm. See what words and expressions they use. Then write, and review your work. If you notice any flaws, remember them so you don't make the same mistakes in your future writing. Just keep reading and writing, and as long as you actually try, you'll get better and better.
EDIT: Oh, and if you can find someone who's able and willing to edit your work, that does wonders. Sadly, I don't have that pleasure, so I'm not nearly as good a writer as I'd like to be... if you have the opportunity to have someone edit your work, you should definitely take it(if you want to improve your writing, that is).
I know I'm not the greatest at writing or reviewing, so in saying that, just take your time and don't copy wiki anymore, even if your next review sucks and everyone gives it thumbs down, atleast you tried and your writing will get better as you continue.
" Example of a well written review "If we're taking that approach then here's a bunch.
:D
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment