Operation: Watch All the James Bonds: Episode 1: Dr. No and FRWL

Avatar image for killem_dafoe
KillEm_Dafoe

2739

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

Edited By KillEm_Dafoe

No Caption Provided
Look at this beauty. Take it all in. Maybe even touch yourself to it.
Look at this beauty. Take it all in. Maybe even touch yourself to it.

This past Father's Day, I was finally able to give my dad the essential gift that every son should give their father. No, I'm not talking about making him proud by becoming highly successful, buying a new house and marrying a beautiful woman. He'll be waiting awhile for that. I am, of course, talking about the James Bond blu-ray collection! This amazing box set compiles every single film in the series so far in a very classy presentation of two disc-packed books. In honesty, maybe this gift was as much for myself as it was for him. My dad loves old spy movies, the Bonds included, although he hasn't seen all of them. I like spy stuff a lot too, and I haven't seen ANY of them in their entirety, outside of the Craig films. Nope, not even Goldeneye! As far as I know, that movie is just four dudes in a small building shooting each other with paintball guns.

With the much-anticipated Spectre releasing later this year, I thought what better way for some father and son bond-ing than to watch all 23 007 movies in order? The thought really excited me, because it's something I've been wanting to do for some time. The goal is to watch them all before Spectre comes out this November, which really shouldn't be too hard. We've already gotten through the first two, Dr. No and From Russia With Love. I don't really want to review them, rather just gather some thoughts and observations I made while watching them. Also, though I am a movie lover, I really can't help myself but to make fun of poor/outdated special effects and old filmmaking conventions, something that both my father and I did plenty of throughout these first two movies. It's part of what makes watching them together so much damn fun. I can't wait to run through the rest of the series, but the rest of this blog will focus on the first two.

No Caption Provided

What more logical place to start than at the beginning? Dr. No kicked this legendary franchise off in 1962. It's a somewhat slow start, too. For a series that is mostly known for big stunts and crazy action sequences, the first outing is understandably light on the action. I really didn't know what to expect from these earlier films given the budget and age, though I must say that From Russia With Love does a much better job at setting the precedent for what this series is.

That said, Dr. No is still a fun flick. Maybe a bit ironically more than unironically at this point, but the film still has as much charm as Bond himself. If anything, it does a great job of introducing us to the character of James Bond and who he really is: a master spy with an eternal boner who fucks his way across the globe. Seriously, I didn't think these old films would lean so heavily on that (especially as I'm not familiar at all with Fleming's novels), but he really does just bang like 4 women in this first movie alone. And you know what? They're all still pretty smokin' hot! Particularly the first real Bond girl, Honey Ryder, played by the lovely Ursula Andress. They still really knew how to pick 'em, even back then. The idea of this era of Bond in 2015 is incredibly misogynistic but also undeniably fun. It's seriously funny watching hordes of beautiful women throw themselves at a young Sean Connery moments after meeting him as if they had no free will of their own.

James Bond doesn't care how many legs you have, as long as they're spread.
James Bond doesn't care how many legs you have, as long as they're spread.

Speaking of Connery, one of the first things I, or rather my dad pointed out, was that his eyebrows are huge. They actually wrap around to his temples, which seems absurd. I was not able to stop noticing that after he mentioned it. Weird. He certainly was a handsome fellow back then, though. Even I don't know if I could've kept myself off him. He really does embody this character perfectly. It's crazy to think that Fleming thought he was terrible at first and had to come around later on. Connery just exudes this air of class, efficiency, and sense of always knowing what to do and being in control, even when he isn't. Just by looking at him, you know he's a stone cold bad ass and will ruin your fucking day in an instant if prompted. "It's a Smith & Wesson, and you've had your six" is legitimately one of the coolest one-liners I've ever heard. However, for all that coolness, there are more than a few laughs to be had at his expense.

There are parts of Dr. No that are humorous in their absurdity, and then parts that are flat out gut-bustingly hilarious. The chick "spying" on Bond with that massive fucking camera by taking pictures of him standing like a foot and a half away? You can't not laugh at that. The amazing green screen work (or back then, I'm guessing it was just a video playing behind the actors?) of the car chase is also notable. It was already good enough that the car chasing Bond just appeared to grow comically large as it approached from behind. But then he had to duck and drive under a crane, a scene that literally had my dad and I in tears because of how ridiculous it looked now. Never mind the scene in which Bond and Honey Ryder are being decontaminated in Dr. No's hidden lab by having white goo sprayed out of a hose onto their naked bodies. You don't even need to guess at the jokes that ...came out of that one. That dude Quarell was such a cockblocker, too. There are about 4 or 5 instances where Bond and Ryder are about to get it on, and this guy just chimes in out of nowhere, "Mr. Bond, come quick!". Well, dude, he's either gotta come quick or not at all if you keep fucking interrupting!

Dr. No's story is mildly interesting on its own, and its set-up of "mad scientist/genius is doing/building something that threatens the world" would become commonplace for much of the series. I was actually under the impression that a lot of these movies were self-contained, but Dr. No vaguely introduces SPECTRE and sets the stage for the next few films. What I thought was kind of weird was that the titular villain barely plays a direct part in the film and doesn't even show up until the the last 30 minutes or so. I'd say this was a fairly ineffective way at trying to portray a good villain. I did enjoy the little bit of screen time he did get, however.

Is Dr. No a classic? Sure. I don't think it holds up as well as others might, but it is enjoyable. Maybe not a great way to showcase what the series is all about, but this is the OG Bond, man. It deserves your respect and attention!

No Caption Provided

Now THIS one I was truly excited for. I'd always heard from many that this was one of, if not THE best Bond movie. As a younger guy who's not an old fart looking at things through smudgy rose-tinted glasses, I wasn't inclined to prepare myself for that level of awesome (also seeing as Casino Royale is probably in my top 10 favorite films of all time). But I gotta say, this was a quite excellent sequel and handily outdid Dr. No in practically every respect. The films were made only a year apart, but there is a world of difference in story, characters, action, and general quality. I'm sure having double the budget (a whole 2 MILLION DOLLARS!) helped quite a bit. I just found From Russia With Love to be infinitely more entertaining.

This film starts making use of its wide cast of characters to much better effect than its predecessor. Here, I found it easy to pinpoint exactly where Mike Meyers got many of his ideas for Austin Powers. Rosa Klebb was a standout. The idea of a little old Austrian lady being tasked with spearheading an operation to kill of the world's top spies is ridiculous enough, but her personality and actions are priceless, particularly when she's being chewed out by Blofeld, and then at the end when she's fighting Bond. She also punches legendary screen actor Robert Shaw in the stomach near the beginning just to test his strength. Funny as hell, probably unintentionally so. My dad got a real kick out of the amazing punching sounds used in this film; something like an old wooden chair being thrown against a large metal sheet. Anyway, Shaw plays an ex-KGB agent working for SPECTRE, named Donald Grant. He doesn’t get a ton of screen time, but I couldn’t help but think how damn cool this guy was the entire time. Kind of a shame he had to go out and couldn’t live to…die another day. But you know who else was cool? Connery. Sean fucking Connery was cool, even cooler and more of a bad ass than in Dr. No. Even when he’s a huge dork he’s still cool. I’m starting to get why he is so beloved in these films. He's just fun to watch.

I can assure you, Mr. Bond, that you've never seen one quite like...this.
I can assure you, Mr. Bond, that you've never seen one quite like...this.

One interesting twist was that the audience knows that the Bond girl, Tatiana Romanova, is supposedly evil the entire time. She lures Bond in with, what else, her good looks and lots of screwing literally within seconds of meeting him. This is all part of the assassination game that SPECTRE or SMERSH or whoever the fuck is playing. Romanova’s actress, Daniela Bianchi, doesn’t actually speak a lick of English and all her lines are overdubbed by another actress. It works out pretty convincingly, to my surprise.

What really makes From Russia With Love so entertaining, especially after watching Dr. No, is that everything is ratcheted up another few notches. The trademark gadgets are introduced here, and there is more espionage, more sexual innuendo, and more action. Especially the action! Most of it is loaded into the last act, but if you’re curious to see what an action film from the early 1960’s looks like, I assure you that it’s much better than you’d think. A huge shootout, a boat chase, a weird helicopter part, and a brutal fistfight between Bond and Grant in a passenger train car that holds up way better than it has any right to (the fight holds up, I mean. The train car actually takes a beating). Sure, much of the action is filled with odd editing choices and awkwardly drawn out shots, but for being over 50 years old, I certainly can’t complain! Oh, and there’s a super bizarre and hysterically bad cat fight between two hot tribal women that has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Perhaps the highlight of the film.

I would have to say that From Russian With Love left me with a pretty good feeling and made me even more eager to see how the series evolved from there. I’m also incredibly excited to watch the actual shitty Bond movies like Moonraker, because I’m sure they’re jam-packed with the terrible, corny goodness I’m looking for. But for now, Goldfinger is next in line! Thanks for reading!

Avatar image for bisonhero
BisonHero

12791

Forum Posts

625

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By BisonHero

As far as being familiar with Fleming's novels, it varies movie to movie. The Bond character in the books has a certain level of cockiness that all of the Bond actors have portrayed to varying degrees. The films don't hue that close to the books, for the most part. Some of the earlier Connery films stay the closest to the plots of the book. Dr. No in particular actually has most of the plot events and characters from the book. But seemingly all of the Roger Moore and onward movies are nothing like the book they're based on, and eventually they run out of actual Fleming books. The Living Daylights and Octopussy were short stories, and the film bears no resemblance to the short story, and all the titles past the Dalton era are original titles except for Casino Royale.

For what it's worth, the books actually get into the nitty gritty of like, what pistol Bond prefers and semi-legit military stuff, which I feel like the movies barely ever touch on. At times the books sorta feel like proto-Clancy, in a way that the campy movies never have. Though unlike Clancy, Fleming wasn't terribly afraid of having the occasional chapter of "things are kinda slow right now on this stake out, how about Bond and some woman make love". Most of the Bond novels I read were pretty good reads, except for The Spy Who Loved Me, which is completely dreadful.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f899c29358e
deactivated-63f899c29358e

3175

Forum Posts

203

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I did that last year, some of the movies are rough, but I think all of them are enjoyable in one way or another.

Avatar image for killem_dafoe
KillEm_Dafoe

2739

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

@bisonhero: That's interesting, since that's actually how I imagined them being in my head. Have you ever read any of the post-Fleming novels? I never knew how many there were until looking it up, but it's a staggering amount. I'm curious as to how they compare and if people still consider the series relevant and good in book form.

@village_guy: That's cool. What would you say is the "best" bad Bond movie?

Avatar image for lawgamer
LawGamer

1481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@bisonhero: That's interesting, since that's actually how I imagined them being in my head. Have you ever read any of the post-Fleming novels? I never knew how many there were until looking it up, but it's a staggering amount. I'm curious as to how they compare and if people still consider the series relevant and good in book form.

@village_guy: That's cool. What would you say is the "best" bad Bond movie?

I haven't read any of the new ones, but @bisonhero is correct that the old ones are kind of "proto-Clancy." Fleming based a lot of his characters on his own experiences and acquaintances from working in British Naval Intelligence during the war, so he knew enough about the practical side of things be be fairly accurate in his descriptions.

And surprisingly, there's sort of a weird parallel between the two I never knew existed until I looked it up - both benefitted immensely from an endorsement by a sitting US president. Fleming's career had sort of stalled out until Kennedy read and recommended From Russia with Love, which resulted in it selling about a billion copies. Similarly, all the major publishers passed on Clancy's Hunt for Red October. The original run was only published in a small batch by the Naval Press, who owed Clancy a favor. A copy found its way to into the hands of Ronald Reagan, who recommended it off the cuff in an interview, resulting in a huge demand . . .

. . . I just realize I spend way too much time on the internet.

Anyway, I've always wished someone would write a really good biography of Fleming (I'm sure one was out there, I've just never found it). The dude was kind of fascinating. He created one of the first dedicated intelligence commando units, and he had the original idea for what would later become Operation Mincemeat. He also worked with US Intelligence to design the basic structure of what would become the OSS (and eventually the CIA). A lot of good ideas, but I gather he was sort of an a-hole who was kind of hard to work with, so he never got a lot of credit for this work.

As far as the best "bad" Bond movie, it pretty much comes down to picking one of the Roger Moore ones:

Live and Let Die: Come for the Baron Samedi character, stay for the ridiculously over-the-top racism.

Moonraker: This is where Dr. Evil got his "laser" fetish.

For Your Eyes Only: Because Roger Moore was about 105 years old at this point, there are some really obvious shots of stand-ins during the action scenes. But you also get Christopher Walken, so it all kind of works out.

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By notnert427

@onekillwonder: Goldfinger is one of the best Bond films, so you should enjoy it. Connery was/is awesome.

Fleming's novels are also worth reading, but @bisonhero is dead-on with the proto-Clancy comment. If you're into that, they're great, but if not, you might glaze over during those parts. The only post-Fleming book I read was For Special Services, which I found to be surprisingly good.

Bond films are great for what they are. There are some duds, and some cringe-worthy campiness, but they're mostly good fun. A few of the modern ones like Casino Royale and Skyfall are legitimately good movies beyond just being fun action romps. Spectre, with Mendes at the helm again and Christoph Waltz as Blofeld, looks capable of being the best yet. I applaud your endeavor, duder. Enjoy.

Avatar image for ivdamke
ivdamke

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By ivdamke

It's always cool to see other people get into Bond and even moreso actually looking forward to the shitty movies as well. I had the reverse of how you came about watching the films as my dad introduced me to the films back when I was around 5 he showed me Goldfinger and then when I was 16 he bought me the box set on DVD, they've been a big part of my growing up and still continue to entertain me to this day.

As for the best "bad" film to me it's easily Live and Let Die. It has a kickass theme by Paul and Linda McCartney, Roger Moore and his stupid face and of course my favourite Bond villain Baron Samedi.

Avatar image for tikimorpher
tikimorpher

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Just a suggestion but the Nerdist family of podcasts have a show called James bonding where 2 of Hardwicks co-hosts watch and discuss all the Bond films. They can be pretty entertaining.

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By notnert427

@baronsamedi said:

As for the best "bad" film to me it's easily Live and Let Die. It has a kickass theme by Paul and Linda McCartney, Roger Moore and his stupid face and of course my favourite Bond villain Baron Samedi.

That's a decent pick, because that movie at least had some redeeming qualities. Octopussy, however, is just flat-out bad, and arguably the worst Bond film. 00 agents dressed like motherfucking clowns. God damnit.

Also, @onekillwonder_: Please take a crack at ranking the Bond films when you've finished them all. I'd be really interested to hear a 2015 perspective on how some of these hold up.

Avatar image for zefpunk
Zefpunk

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

SO glad you loved From Russia With Love as much as I do. That movie is a straight classic.

You even mentioned the train fight scene (because how could you forget it) which is so god damned awesome! I remember seeing for the first time and just being blown away by it a few years ago. One of my favorite Bond fights (along with the G.O.A.T. Goldeneye hand to hand scene) and one of my all time favorite fights in movies.

Avatar image for triplestan
triplestan

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By triplestan

I really really love Casino Royale but From Russia With Love might be my favorite Bond movie for one reason: Robert Shaw.

That man had some goddamn presence.

@tikimorpher said:

Just a suggestion but the Nerdist family of podcasts have a show called James bonding where 2 of Hardwicks co-hosts watch and discuss all the Bond films. They can be pretty entertaining.

I second this suggestion, it's probably one of my favorite podcasts and I don't even really like the James Bond movies.

Also, just to nitpick, technically only Matt Mira is the co-host of Nerdist, the other Matt (Gourley) is co-host of the Superego podcast - which is also amazing - and the spokesperson for literally every Volkswagen commercial on TV now.

Avatar image for ivdamke
ivdamke

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@notnert427: Yea Octopussy was pretty bad, it's one of my least watched of the films. Also that would be cool to hear a 2015 perspective on the films in the end.

OHMSS will definetly be at the top of that list!

Avatar image for jaypb08
JayPB08

418

Forum Posts

23

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 4

From Russia to Love will always be the best pre-Craig Bond ever

Avatar image for killem_dafoe
KillEm_Dafoe

2739

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

Also, @onekillwonder_: Please take a crack at ranking the Bond films when you've finished them all. I'd be really interested to hear a 2015 perspective on how some of these hold up.

Oh, I definitely will. I was actually thinking about that tonight. I just got done watching Goldfinger (which I loved, but I'll write about that separately...there's a LOT I want to cover) and was thinking about how difficult it might start to get keeping an ordered ranking of such a huge series. What I will say right now is that the ranking stands as the order in which the first three have been released. I've enjoyed each one increasingly more than the last. Going into Thunderball, I feel like I know virtually nothing about it, or the remainder of any of the Connery films for that matter.

Just a suggestion but the Nerdist family of podcasts have a show called James bonding where 2 of Hardwicks co-hosts watch and discuss all the Bond films. They can be pretty entertaining.

I remember them mentioning that when they first did but I'd completely forgot about it until now. Thanks, duder! I might give them a listen after I've watched all of the movies.

It's always cool to see other people get into Bond and even moreso actually looking forward to the shitty movies as well. I had the reverse of how you came about watching the films as my dad introduced me to the films back when I was around 5 he showed me Goldfinger and then when I was 16 he bought me the box set on DVD, they've been a big part of my growing up and still continue to entertain me to this day.

That's pretty awesome, man. I was never into spy stuff as a kid, and I don't recall my dad ever really trying to get me into it, or even watching that many movies around me. I know he always loved In Like Flynt, though. I guess I first started liking the spy genre when I played No One Lived Forever back in the day. Then years later Casino Royale came out and I loved it. Then I watched the show Chuck and loved that too, because that show is filled to the brim with loving homages to the genre. I've been digging that stuff more and more as I get older.

Avatar image for blackout62
Blackout62

2241

Forum Posts

84

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#14  Edited By Blackout62

This might be on the 50th anniversary collection but if not there's a great documentary on the Bond films called Everything or Nothing that came out just before Skyfall. It's on Netflix and other than the interesting history of the franchise it has everyone involved unashamedly declaring which films were terrible, definitely worth watching after seeing all the films.

Avatar image for killem_dafoe
KillEm_Dafoe

2739

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

@blackout62: There are a LOT of special features in this collection...something like over 130 hours overall. I've been trying to watch a bit of them on each disc after the movie. The best stuff is the old archival promo footage. I'm not sure if that documentary is in this thing or not, but that sounds really cool and worth checking out after all is said and done. Thanks for the recommendation.