I am a tad worried that we've had two reviews, within relatively close temporal proximity, of games that were not finished by the writer. Specifically I'm referring to Steel Battalion and Scott Tenorman's Revenge. I could deal with the Sotuh Park game because it was pretty clearly a cash-in with no real value, but I was genuinely interested to hear if Steel Battalion eventually got good. What did we actually get out of the review that we didn't get from 2 minutes of the Quick Look?
I remember back in the early days that Jeff Gerstmann was considering doing a write-up without a score of Dark Sector (he eventually finished the game, making it GB's first review). I would rather see a separate category for that type of written content, so that reviews can retain their value and status. I don't think that this is an unreasonable thing to request, as it ultimately serves us the users better by clearly differentiating formats of criticism.