1.it's as simple as this people. our companies will not be able to compete with the companies in other countries simply because they have to pay for healthcare in the us, companies will either start moving out of here, or they will lobby for this.
2. we do have socialized things here, socialism is not bad, when in moderation. some examples are, schools, fire department, police, colleges, the military(this is a big one people don't realize), public highways, parks, libraries, and already medicare
3. the money is there. we're just not willing to spend it. how many billions of dollars were wasted on a bailout that could have been instead spent on a healthcare bill that would have actually done soemthing?
socialized medicine is necessary
This topic is locked from further discussion.
1. Companies being incentivized (and in some states, forced) to provide healthcare for employees is an example of socialized medicine already existing in the U.S.. As well as medicare and medicaid. 2 programs which will be 34 trillion dollars underfunded in the coming decades. The money to pay for it will be taxed or inflated, but either way, it won't be "free" healthcare. (It never was.).
2. Private education is widely known to be superior to public education throughout most of the world. The notion that the military is "socialized" is completely ludicrous. A "private" military is an armed gang. Capitalists are not opposed to the existence of national defence.
3. No, the money is not there. The U.S. government is trillions of dollars in debt, and will be trillions of more dollars in debt in the future. The way your government pays for these shortfalls is through inflation, a process which hurts the poor the most. The bailout was a bad idea, you create a false dichotomy by saying "the government should spend money on healthcare, not failing banks." Your government should be doing NEITHER.
The socialism already extant within your country's economy needs to be excised from the government before it sinks your nation even further.
The money is not there, we are several TRILLION dollars in debt! We cannot keep imagining that we have all this money! WE DON'T! We cannot do things like this until we clear up some of that debt. We keep borrowing it from China and other growing world powers, which allows them to build schools, to train more and more workers that are smarter and better prepared for the current world economy. I don't care if alot of people don't have healthcare, in the long run, everyone's going to suffer from all this debt.
Im an american, and yes i already have healthcare so my view is skewed a bit, but i don't like how we are building a foundation on something that doesn't even exist.
EDIT: Maybe narrow minded is too strong of an expression for this situation, but both sides need to just agree and come up with a concept that everyone can agree on
I live in the UK and the NHS is the reason that my Wife (who had the the most aggressive form of Cancer) and Daughter (who suffered acute Kidney failure) are alive. It may not be perfect but it works and it's the one thing my country cherishes. If nothing else we see healthcare as a right not a privilege. The small amount that comes out of my wages each month that goes to the NHS is money well spent, we just want it spent more effectively and not wasted on middle management.
The US really needs to stop throwing the word Socialism around and using it as a label carefree. It really isn't helping maters.
" 1. Companies being incentivized (and in some states, forced) to provide healthcare for employees is an example of socialized medicine already existing in the U.S.. As well as medicare and medicaid. 2 programs which will be 34 trillion dollars underfunded in the coming decades. The money to pay for it will be taxed or inflated, but either way, it won't be "free" healthcare. (It never was.). 2. Private education is widely known to be superior to public education throughout most of the world. The notion that the military is "socialized" is completely ludicrous. A "private" military is an armed gang. Capitalists are not opposed to the existence of national defence. 3. No, the money is not there. The U.S. government is trillions of dollars in debt, and will be trillions of more dollars in debt in the future. The way your government pays for these shortfalls is through inflation, a process which hurts the poor the most. The bailout was a bad idea, you create a false dichotomy by saying "the government should spend money on healthcare, not failing banks." Your government should be doing NEITHER. The socialism already extant within your country's economy needs to be excised from the government before it sinks your nation even further. "Everything you said is true... for the rich. If you have money, than private education is superior. If you have money, private health care is superior. If you don't have money, then you can't go to school, and you can't get treated. That's the difference between the two systems. One caters to the rich, the other to everyone (the rich are still rich, so they're happy, the poor can spend their limited money on other things so they're happy).
The problem is that a third of the American population does not have money.
Private healthcare provides the best standard of care for those who can afford it/insurance.
Public healthcare provides a reduced standard of healthcare for everyone same for education.
Personally speaking a system in which everyone can get a good level of treatment is better than one in which many people can get none.
However it comes at a cost of high taxes, and that will never happen in the states outside of MA. The US cannot afford socialized healthcare at this time. The UK cannot afford its pension scheme you will have to work until you are as old as Methuslah.
I dont want education and healthcare to be open to market pressures of profit and cost. Companies cut costs. Companies are very evil and very useful.
As for government-run healthcare saving lives, by that logic, I could argue that the Canada Health Act killed my father, but we both know that's not true. Late detection of his liver cancer and a lack of available treatment options killed him. It was the health care professionals and health researchers who saved your daughter and wife's lives, not the theft used to fund their efforts.
Nearly 90 million people – about one-third of the population below the age of 65 spent a portion of either 2007 or 2008 without health coverage.
- http://www.nchc.org/facts/coverage.shtml
This is fucking retarded.
You are already in debt:
You are already paying taxes.
This just increases said taxes a small amount.
You will always need health care so you will always pay for it.
Everyone can afford an extra 1% on their taxes. Not everyone can afford 40 000$ for a minor operation, and if they take out a loan, they'll never pay it off.
@pirate_republic said:
The solution to that problem is not diminishing the poor's purchasing power even further. Health care in Canada doesn't cater to everyone. It caters to political whim. Third of all, public education actually ends up driving down the quality offered to the middle class (since they are forced to pay for public schools through taxes and can't afford private schools) while the poorest get the same education they would have gotten anyways." @Suicrat said:
" 1. Companies being incentivized (and in some states, forced) to provide healthcare for employees is an example of socialized medicine already existing in the U.S.. As well as medicare and medicaid. 2 programs which will be 34 trillion dollars underfunded in the coming decades. The money to pay for it will be taxed or inflated, but either way, it won't be "free" healthcare. (It never was.). 2. Private education is widely known to be superior to public education throughout most of the world. The notion that the military is "socialized" is completely ludicrous. A "private" military is an armed gang. Capitalists are not opposed to the existence of national defence. 3. No, the money is not there. The U.S. government is trillions of dollars in debt, and will be trillions of more dollars in debt in the future. The way your government pays for these shortfalls is through inflation, a process which hurts the poor the most. The bailout was a bad idea, you create a false dichotomy by saying "the government should spend money on healthcare, not failing banks." Your government should be doing NEITHER. The socialism already extant within your country's economy needs to be excised from the government before it sinks your nation even further. "Everything you said is true... for the rich. If you have money, than private education is superior. If you have money, private health care is superior. If you don't have money, then you can't go to school, and you can't get treated. That's the difference between the two systems. One caters to the rich, the other to everyone (the rich are still rich, so they're happy, the poor can spend their limited money on other things so they're happy). The problem is that a third of the American population does not have money. "
Anyways, the best way to make a service more affordable to the poor is to allow competition to take place in a free market, and to increase supply. The U.S. has over 1000 health insurance companies. But they're heavily regulated by the government, and are given regional monopolies and oligopolies. The cure is not more government intervention (since as I already mentioned, the full "public option" is simply not possible right now), but less.
Although I do agree with you about what is to be done about the US's troubles.
" @Suicrat: You keep mentioning this whole thing about debt. Sure, with public health care you always pay taxes, and with private, you are in debt only for a short while. This is fucking retarded. You are already in debt:You are already paying taxes. This just increases said taxes a small amount. You will always need health care so you will always pay for it. Everyone can afford an extra 1% on their taxes. Not everyone can afford 40 000$ for a minor operation, and if they take out a loan, they'll never pay it off. "Adding taxes will merely harm the poor even more. Even if they don't pay it directly. Adding arbitrary costs to a thing (in the case of what you're talking about, everything) only increases the costs.
As for a 40 000 dollar operation, how the hell can someone afford to pay a several-hundred thousand dollar mortgage but not a several-dozen thousand dollar loan? Your sense of mathematics is fucked.
Moreover, if healthcare were an unregulated industry, costs would be going down, so we don't know what that surgery would cost, but I guarantee you it would be less if there was more competition. (Proof of that is the rate of price decline in the computer industry relative to the rate of price decline in other, more heavily-regulated industries.)
As for the problem of debt, removing the cost burden from the receiver of a good drives up the cost of that good. People are more liberal about discretionary health products and services if they don't pay the true cost, so hiding the cost among government finances will not drive the cost down, but instead drive it up. And if you think it's a small amount, consider medicare and medicaid. It is 34 trillion dollars underfunded and it only provides healthcare to the oldest within society. What happens when the tax burden has to incorporate every demographic of society? Well, the costs will go up exponentially. Where is that money going to come from? Deficit financing, that's where. And all that will do, as I said before, is inflate the currency, and diminish the purchasing power of the poor.
You need to get it out of your head that to give the government the responsibility to pay for a thing is for the benefit of the poor, this is simply untrue.
Not true at all. Public schools are funded on a regional basis, so a public school in a rich area is superior to a public school in a poor area. It would be nice if all public schools were middle class bracket because rich people could just go to private schools while their taxes continue funding for schools in rougher areas like the projects. But that's not how it is." @Suicrat: The poorest wouldn't have gotten ANY education if it wasn't public. The middle class get the same education as they would if it was private. The upper class get a diminished education. It balances itself out. Although I do agree with you about what is to be done about the US's troubles. "
Yeah it's a crying shame that people can't pay for health care, however me and my family have worked to get where we are, to get what we have, and I mean we've worked hard, and we have lost a lot. So why should we sacrifice even more so that people who may be less fortunate however a vast number of them are too goddamn lazy to get off their asses to do some fuckin work can have something of ours!?! And in my opinion and every study I have done, that is communist, whether you like it or not it's communist.
Oh and another thing: We can't pay for this, we simply can't, seriously if we can't supply our soldiers with decent gear, then how can we pay for an entire nation to have health care? Especially since even Medicare is in debt. A system built almost just like this "public health care" system, already has tanked and is in heavy debt, it doesn't work it simply doesn't. Britian is in massive debt because of their free health care system, Canadians come to America to seek treatment. Why would we create that kind of a system?
WOW, STFU with branding shit as socialized if it's isn't heavily privitized. Seriously are you Americans that stupid that you didn't realize the Cold War ended nearly 2 motherfucking decades ago? I know your politicians are mostly responsible for being fear mongering shit eating fuck heads, but that's not excuse for going ahead and actually believing them.
@pirate_republic said:
That is not true at all. The expansion of the education burden leads to funding rationing, and the districts where the funds get rationed the heaviest are the poorest neighbourhoods." @Suicrat: The poorest wouldn't have gotten ANY education if it wasn't public. The middle class get the same education as they would if it was private. The upper class get a diminished education. It balances itself out. Although I do agree with you about what is to be done about the US's troubles. "
More people could afford private education if it becomes more widely available. (Which is why I plan on opening a private alternative school that will offer scholarships to economically-disadvantaged youth without a cent of taxed money.)
" WOW, STFU with branding shit as socialized if it's isn't heavily privitized. Seriously are you Americans that stupid that you didn't realize the Cold War ended nearly 2 motherfucking decades ago? I know your politicians are mostly responsible for being fear mongering shit eating fuck heads, but that's not excuse for going ahead and actually believing them. "See, right here is the most fucked up thing. People on the left realize just how corrupt and evil politicians are, yet they want them to hold the purse strings on fundamental matters such as education and healthcare. I don't fucking get it.
" WOW, STFU with branding shit as socialized if it's isn't heavily privitized. Seriously are you Americans that stupid that you didn't realize the Cold War ended nearly 2 motherfucking decades ago? I know your politicians are mostly responsible for being fear mongering shit eating fuck heads, but that's not excuse for going ahead and actually believing them. "But it is socialized. The reality of what it is and how certain people percieve a word are two different issues. The dems should have spent time making people comfortable with the word socialism by explaining what it actually is instead of dancing around the word while endorsing socialist (that doesn't mean bad) policies. The word loses power when people actually know what it means, if they're associating it with Stalin or something they just need some clarification.
" @RsistncE said:You vote for your evil corrupt politicians you don't have a say in the "evil corrupt" corporations." WOW, STFU with branding shit as socialized if it's isn't heavily privitized. Seriously are you Americans that stupid that you didn't realize the Cold War ended nearly 2 motherfucking decades ago? I know your politicians are mostly responsible for being fear mongering shit eating fuck heads, but that's not excuse for going ahead and actually believing them. "See, right here is the most fucked up thing. People on the left realize just how corrupt and evil politicians are, yet they want them to hold the purse strings on fundamental matters such as education and healthcare. I don't fucking get it. "
@ryanwho: I don't associate it with anyone in particular, but a society of all being enslaved to all. The trillions of dollars in debt that have already come about, and will in the future come about because of the desire for socialized medicine is not worth what you're getting.
Healthcare doesn't get produced out of thin air. It costs resources, effort, time, and money. You can't make these issues go away with the signing of a government cheque. The world isn't that simple. Governments are not omnipotent.
@ieatlions said:
That is fucking ludicrous. A government is a monopoly, a free market is competition. If the evil corrupt corporation jacks up the price, then they open the door for more competition (if the government hasn't granted them a regional monopoly, as is currently the case in the U.S. health industry.)" @Suicrat said:
" @RsistncE said:You vote for your evil corrupt politicians you don't have a say in the "evil corrupt" corporations. "" WOW, STFU with branding shit as socialized if it's isn't heavily privitized. Seriously are you Americans that stupid that you didn't realize the Cold War ended nearly 2 motherfucking decades ago? I know your politicians are mostly responsible for being fear mongering shit eating fuck heads, but that's not excuse for going ahead and actually believing them. "See, right here is the most fucked up thing. People on the left realize just how corrupt and evil politicians are, yet they want them to hold the purse strings on fundamental matters such as education and healthcare. I don't fucking get it. "
If a well-intentioned government official mismanages the industry, it effects everyone, and you can't do anything about it till the next election (if then). You people need to stop and think before you make posts.
" 1.it's as simple as this people. our companies will not be able to compete with the companies in other countries simply because they have to pay for healthcare in the us, companies will either start moving out of here, or they will lobby for this.
2. we do have socialized things here, socialism is not bad, when in moderation. some examples are, schools, fire department, police, colleges, the military(this is a big one people don't realize), public highways, parks, libraries, and already medicare
3. the money is there. we're just not willing to spend it. how many billions of dollars were wasted on a bailout that could have been instead spent on a healthcare bill that would have actually done soemthing? "1. The only reasons it is so expensive is because of the ridiculous regulations clinics need, such as the practicioner insurance which costs the clinics more than their medical equipment. Second, the fact that they have to deal with HMOs as compared to individuals means they charge well over market price because they are dealing with corporations, not individuals. Individuals could never pay the high costs of health care without the HMO's, but HMO's are half the reason why the costs are so high in the first place.
2. Yes, socialism is bad, especially in moderation. You assume that without those services being run by the state, they would not exist, that's just plain wrong. I know that in the 1800's, when the merchants in England decided to privately build their own roads and police them, it was the best and safest transportation system in the world at the time. Roads could be built without government, and maintained better. Saying that our state run police is a good thing is laughable. The police run by the state abuse people and violate our rights on a daily basis. If the police were privately run, they would have been fired and replaced long ago. Private security guards (go to a business anywhere in New York) are much more friendly and just as good. Public education is a joke. I know this from personal experience. Libraries, and parks, same thing. All of these would exist if people like them. If demand exists, then so does the product.
What I'm arguing for is basically anarchy, not even a limited Constitutional limited government. What you said, are that these things are "socialized". You better look up the meaning of the word. A military, police, parks, and roads being built by the state, is hardly equivalent to a socliaist government. It's called a mixed economy.
3. What do you mean the money is there? Do you mean that the government has a ton of money laying around but they just don't feel like spending it? Our government is trillions of dollars in debt. The money is NOT there. But if you meant that the money is there in the private sector, then so be it, people will get there health insurance.
Well I do agree the government should stop wasting our (it's not our's if they can take it without consent) money on things such as a bailout, I don't think it should be wasted in some other government program destined to fail.
" I live in the UK and the NHS is the reason that my Wife (who had the the most aggressive form of Cancer) and Daughter (who suffered acute Kidney failure) are alive. It may not be perfect but it works and it's the one thing my country cherishes. If nothing else we see healthcare as a right not a privilege. The small amount that comes out of my wages each month that goes to the NHS is money well spent, we just want it spent more effectively and not wasted on middle management. The US really needs to stop throwing the word Socialism around and using it as a label carefree. It really isn't helping maters. "You do realize your wife would have had better treatment in the US? The US has the best cancer treatment in the world, even if it's privatized. And if you live here and can't afford it, you could get it with medicaid.
" @Mikemcn said:A human right? Weird, the word "right" can be used in so many ways."The money is not there, we are several TRILLION dollars in debt! We cannot keep imagining that we have all this money! WE DON'T! We cannot do things like this until we clear up some of that debt. We keep borrowing it from China and other growing world powers, which allows them to build schools, to train more and more workers that are smarter and better prepared for the current world economy. I don't care if alot of people don't have healthcare, in the long run, everyone's going to suffer from all this debt. Im an american, and yes i already have healthcare so my view is skewed a bit, but i don't like how we are building a foundation on something that doesn't even exist. "healthcare is a basic human need that everyone has a right to regardless of their personal economic situation, we need free healthcare, if we dont it will bankrupt the nation. Just my 2 Cents. Oh yeah and legalize pot- big money there. "
If I say we have a right to own guns, that means that I can own a gun if I can afford it, and no one has the systematic and just authority to take it from me after I have purchased it.
Yet, when we talk about the right to health care, it means that I will be given health care by taking money from someone and then going to me. It has nothing to do with people taking away my property, but instead, it is giving me something I cannot get on me own.
The law of indiscernibles would lead me to believe that gun rights, the right to free speech, habeus corpus, and all those rights, cannot possibly be in the same category as a right to education, health care, food, housing, etc..
One category is liberty (the bill of rights), meaning that no one can take it away from you. The other category is power (right to health care), meaning we should all be given power by first taking away liberty.
Now, i'm not too into the political side of things, but i just want to ask. If the rest of the world find it so idiotic, maybe they could do something about it instead of just gossip?" @Suicrat: Buddy, I'm not even fucking American. Just to make something clear for you: the rest of the world isn't so fucked in the head that everything they do, in every second, of every day needs to be categorized by political affiliation. I'm just telling you everyone outside of the US is really baffled at the shitstorm of idiocy going on in that country. Not surprisingly people have been baffled many times over the years at the shitstorm of idiocy that generally seems to thrive in the US. "
" I wonder who honestly believes that the US will ever be able to pay back it's debt. I mean it's 11.4 trillion $. That's almost the GDP from the US in 2008. "Because our debt is growing much faster than our GDP, and there is no end in sight. Spending is skyrocketting due to underfunded programs, such as social security, medicare, etc...Yet our productive growth is slowing at a fast rate because of the increase consumption and decrease in production.
That 11.4 trillion doesn't even come to close to the real deficit because they don't factor in tranfer of payments debts.
So how will we pay back an increasing debt? Either 1) Inflate, 2) Increase taxes. Both will be disastrous, and no politician wants to bite the bullet. Politicians will keep delaying the inevitable for personal gains until people stop lending us money. We are fucked.
I'm Canadian also. However, just because you're an outsider, does not mean the points you're raising are immune to reality.
As for the rest of the world not being so concerned for political affiliation, I suggest you go to France or Britain, or Iran, or India, or any part of southern or eastern Europe. They've got a loud, vociferous opposition in those places too.
But seriously, I agree with this philosophy, but not with health care. Everyone has the right to live, and therefore everyone should have to have access to health care. Extras, even food, should be earned. I'm not a communist. There needs to be a motive for work, and if you work more, you get more money. Just not with health.
" @Suicrat: No I won't address that, because first of all I'm not a US citizen. Second of all, you are the makers of your own demise. The US has been a cesspool for everything that is wrong in the first world ever since the end of WW2. Fact of the matter is providing life saving health care to everyone in a VERY affordable manner should trump things like, oh you know, DROPPING BOMBS ON THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES AND KILLING THEIR PEOPLE. Just a thought. "It's not going to be VERY AFFORDABLE, it's going to CRIPPLE THEM!
And again, you present a false dichotomy. Just because a government is wasting billions of dollars on a war it can't win doesn't mean it's okay for it to waste trillions of dollars in a healthcare shell game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment