[UK] Want to watch porn? Tell your provider!

#1 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2323 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago
#2 Posted by Fizzy (384 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Lol, that's pretty funny :P

#3 Posted by mylifeforAiur (3413 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

What does Stephen Fry think about this heated issue?

#4 Posted by GS_Dan (1240 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Won't somebody please think of the children, etc.

#5 Posted by Rolyatkcinmai (2539 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Land of the free.

#6 Posted by Village_Guy (2099 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

#7 Posted by phrosnite (3378 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

The internet is for porn.

#8 Posted by Jimi (1117 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

This is going to lead to awkward conversations with parents everywhere.

#9 Posted by Jonnyflash80 (469 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

It's up to parents to restrict their kid's access to porn, not the ISPs.

#10 Posted by Contro (2040 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Jonnyflash80 said:

It's up to parents to restrict their kid's access to porn, not the ISPs.

Agreed.

I knew it wouldn't take long for David Cameron to start enforcing his bullshit driven pro Christian agenda.

#11 Posted by Lunar_Aura (2780 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@GS_Dan said:

Won't somebody please think of the children, etc.

ew

#12 Posted by WinterSnowblind (7379 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Down with this sort of thing!

#13 Edited by Arker101 (1470 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Village_Guy said:

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

What if they block Giantbomb? You know what happens if you google

Naked Cartoon Pussy.

#14 Posted by Village_Guy (2099 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Arker101 said:

@Village_Guy said:

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

What if they block Giantbomb? You know what happens if you google

Naked Cartoon Pussy.

Damn you Naked Cartoon Pussy!

Damn you all!

#15 Posted by MachoFantastico (3698 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

It at to be done (if it hasn't already). :D

#16 Edited by atomic_dumpling (2323 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago
"Bailey's report asked for government and business to work together on initiatives such as ending the sale of inappropriately "sexy" clothing for young children, for example underwired bras and T-shirts with suggestive slogans." 
 
Suggestive slogans? Like "just do it" or "I'm lovin' it"?
#17 Posted by PenguinDust (12110 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

So it seems sex is more dangerous than violence. What a world we live in today.

#18 Posted by MikkaQ (9720 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

#19 Posted by Meowshi (2876 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@PenguinDust said:

So it seems sex is more dangerous than violence. What a world we live in today.

Well, you're far more likely to engage in one than the other.

#20 Edited by zudthespud (3205 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago
#21 Edited by Vanek (347 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Jimi said:

This is going to lead to awkward conversations with parents everywhere.

And also some wives considering some of the people I work with. XD

Seriously though I really don't know what to think, I mean, it probably wont work and it hardly seems like an actual problem that needs to be solved. I also noticed my ISP isn't participating and surely it's a pointless exercise unless all the major ISPs do it?

[EDIT] If it's an opt in service then it makes more sense. That said, I can still see it causing problems and blocking things it maybe shouldn't.

#22 Posted by BrainSpecialist (555 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@zudthespud: They've since changed the original article to reflect this.

The problem isn't just that they'll block porn, but anything else they deem pornographic, regardless of whether or not its actually porn.

#23 Edited by babblinmule (1261 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I'm increasingly starting to despise this current government.....

#24 Posted by Grissefar (2337 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

That seems a little desperate and pathetic.

#25 Edited by theguy (768 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Hopefully Ireland won't follow suit. The thought of ISP's having a list of "porn watchers" is worrying. Maybe the other ISP's will get more custom from people who value their privacy.

#26 Posted by NoelVeiga (861 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

You see censorship, I see a great opportunity to make a sales rep hilariously uncomfortable by describing in excruciating detail all the porn sites I want access to.

I'd call that a win/win.

#27 Posted by theguy (768 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Ah I was a little doubtful when I saw guardian, this makes more sense and is actually a fine idea.

#28 Posted by Still_I_Cry (2494 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I was about to have a rant about how grotesque I find porn but then I read:

"@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Ah I was a little doubtful when I saw guardian, this makes more sense and is actually a fine idea."

I don't see anything wrong with ISPs blocking porn sites etc.

#29 Posted by Suicrat (3732 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

And just last week I read an article on the BBC World Service expressing sympathy with the job performed by film censors. I'd call it the People's Republic of Britain, but you jackasses haven't guillotined your royal family yet, for some strange reason...

#30 Posted by Fizzy (384 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Doesn't really effect me since I am not with the watching of the porns. If I were of the porn watching group, I would be effected, thus, I would be of the porn watching group mentality. Porn.

#31 Posted by Shirogane (3405 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@XII_Sniper said:

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

You mean, there won't be a next generation?

#32 Posted by MikkaQ (9720 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Shirogane said:

@XII_Sniper said:

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

You mean, there won't be a next generation?

Yeah they won't know how to bone and they'll be lost forever, seeking the ancient secrets of reproduction.

#33 Posted by Adamsons (876 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@NoelVeiga said:

You see censorship, I see a great opportunity to make a sales rep hilariously uncomfortable by describing in excruciating detail all the porn sites I want access to.

I'd call that a win/win.

I like the way you think.

#34 Posted by iam3green (14380 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

but the internet is for porn. i can see it now kids are going to have to have an awkward conversation with their parents. kids sex drive are going to be up since they can't get porn anymore. kids start downloading all of the porn that you can. 
  

#35 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2323 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago
@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Looks like we have conflicting articles now. I am going to guess BBC is right, since I usually trust them more.
#36 Posted by alternate (2383 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I don't see the fuss. It is just server side content filters. Don't have kids or don't want restrictions? opt-in or opt-out - whichever actually applies to the scheme. Big deal. Only ppl who should give a damn are 14 year old boys.

#37 Posted by GS_Dan (1240 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@Lunar_Aura: Dammit Lunar

>_<

#38 Posted by CRAzYKiLL3R93 (362 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I completely support this since it's opt-in. If I had to call my isp to see porn on the other hand there's a problem

Kids will find a way round it though, they always do

#39 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2323 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I suppose you mean the filter is opt-in, not the porn.

#40 Posted by dudeglove (6264 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Another fine use of taxpayer's money by a feckless British government. "I know why we had all those riots - those kids were all watching Internet porn! Lets focus on tackling a problem that never existed in the first place!"

#41 Posted by Jadeskye (4324 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

I will happily call virgin media and tell them an explicit list of stuff that i'm into. In fact i'll send david cameron an email with that detail.

Remarkably stupid idea really. They should just implement the XXX root domain for sex, it's the best idea and it's easy for parents to prevent that material getting to their kids.

#42 Posted by JakeTaylor (307 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Yep. I love this country.

#43 Posted by apoptosis61 (600 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

enjoy your freedom

#44 Edited by benjaebe (2782 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Wait, people actually have a problem with ISPs offering a porn filter if the customers ask for it? For fucks sake, read the goddamn BBC article guys. Several people have already pointed out that the OP was wrong. It's no different than if you told your cable provider you don't want the naked people channels.

#45 Posted by Toms115 (2313 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

@benjaebe said:

Wait, people actually have a problem with ISPs offering a porn filter if the customers ask for it? For fucks sake, read the goddamn BBC article guys. Several people have already pointed out that the OP was wrong. It's no different than if you told your cable provider you don't want the naked people channels.

fuck you i like yelling about things

#46 Posted by Example1013 (4432 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

This is retarded just in principle. The government has no business determining what content is not safe for children.

#47 Posted by Dagbiker (6374 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Fuck this Naked Cartoon Pussy thing in the Ass.

#48 Posted by Jack_Daniels (1397 posts) - 1 year, 7 months ago

Amazon better be blocked too, it sells sex toys. Oh and so should Reddit and Wikipedia.

Please Log In

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC