• 57 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for chocobodude3
Posted by Chocobodude3 (1338 posts) 3 years, 5 months ago

Poll: What did you think of Man of Steel (234 votes)

Loved it! 41%
Meh... 47%
Hated it! 16%
Avatar image for sathingtonwaltz
#1 Edited by SathingtonWaltz (2167 posts) -

I'm seeing it today, will let you know what I thought when I get back.

Avatar image for extomar
#2 Posted by EXTomar (5047 posts) -

I think it is okay but the story is kind of a mess which is typical for Snider's movies where the story is bent to facilitate action.

Avatar image for liquiddragon
#3 Posted by liquiddragon (1179 posts) -

Meh....3/5

Avatar image for benny
#4 Posted by Benny (2009 posts) -

Man, it just jumped around all over the place early on and there was no build up to any event, no depth to the characters, no soul to the movie.

but FAORA, dude she was so cool and her fight scenes were phenomenal. She zipped around all over the place Dragonball Z style and I fucking loved that stuff. The action in general was incredible, even if it does become mind-numbing (the jets and dubstep machine were just so noisy.)

Avatar image for joshth
#5 Posted by joshth (642 posts) -

if there was something between meh and hated it, I would choose that. It wasn't awful. There was just very little good about it.

Online
Avatar image for penguindust
#6 Edited by PenguinDust (12985 posts) -

Meh....3/5

This is kind of apropos since it's running at 57% among the top critics on Rotten Tomatoes.

Avatar image for sathingtonwaltz
#7 Edited by SathingtonWaltz (2167 posts) -

I thought it was really good, though I could definitely tell it's one of those love it or hate it movies. It has it's flaws but in general the things that it did well outshine the things that it didn't do well. I'm surprised the consensus on RT is so low, as there are other superhero movies like The Dark Knight Rises and The Amazing Spiderman that I thought were just awful but were very well received.

Avatar image for extomar
#8 Edited by EXTomar (5047 posts) -

As a side topic, I thought Dark Knight Rises was not good either and I'm confused how people could defend such a plot hole ridden mess even through the lens a "comic book story".

The issue with Man of Steel is that they had started with the most solid of Superman's themes but bailed on it when ever they needed action. An invincible god like being who can be above the ethics and law but chooses to let them apply to him. The internal conflict that he can save so many yet can not save everyone leads to darker themes is always a plus. But that was abandoned so they could have hyper involved action scenes so long I wish they would just move on and go back to more interesting things.

In short this feels like a 75 minute movie spread out to 120 minutes.

Avatar image for benny
#9 Posted by Benny (2009 posts) -

Oh and did y'all see the Wayne enterprises logo on the satellite that superman and Zod smash through? Snyder said it was just him goofing.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
#10 Posted by MariachiMacabre (7097 posts) -

@benny said:

Oh and did y'all see the Wayne enterprises logo on the satellite that superman and Zod smash through? Snyder said it was just him goofing.

It's been long rumored that DC is planning a Justice League movie so I have a hard time believing it was just goofing. I would prefer Snyder not be involved in any more DC films because...I don't think he's a very good director. And I don't think he can do a character as beloved and established as Superman (or any major comic book character) justice. And Sucker Punch should have made someone at DC stop and say "Is this guy talented enough to handle the very first superhero well?"

Avatar image for mooseymcman
#11 Edited by MooseyMcMan (12504 posts) -

I think the action and special effects are incredible and insane. It's just that the story isn't particularly good. And Superman/Clark Kent is pretty bland.

What this movie made me realize is that one of the main reasons that I like big dumb action movies is that they're funny. Either through witty dialog, or because the action is ridiculous in a humorous manner. Man of Steel is about as humorless as a Superman movie can be, and I didn't like that.

Also, no Lex Luthor. What's up with that? No, the LexCorp logo on a truck doesn't count.

Avatar image for hunter5024
#12 Edited by Hunter5024 (6691 posts) -

Like, 3.5 out of 5. I think all of the action scenes could have been trimmed down a few minutes, and one of them probably should have been cut from the movie entirely. They could have put that valuable time toward fleshing out the plot a little more, cause there really wasn't very much story to this thing, and most of what there was revolved more around Zod and Jor El than Clark. Also I thought what they did with the tornado was hella stupid. That being said I think they could have done a lot worse, and I'm honestly a little surprised that it came out as well as it did. I think it was a decent start, and they hit a good tone, but I really hope they manage to make a more thoughtful, character driven movie next time. Hopefully with just a tad more color.

Avatar image for afabs515
#13 Posted by afabs515 (1687 posts) -

IMO, there were some weird pacing issues and the story was a bit weak. But I thought it was a really good movie. Was thoroughly entertained and left the theater feeling satisfied. Money and time well spent.

Avatar image for efwefwe
#14 Edited by wefwefasdf (6730 posts) -

I really liked the movie overall, but the dialogue had some issues--especially Lois Lane. The 2v1 fight is probably the coolest superhero fight I've watched.

Avatar image for flindip
#15 Posted by flindip (547 posts) -

I think it suffered from Zimmer's generic film score. They should have bit the bullet and used Williams "Superman March." Its just too iconic of a film score to abandon.

Snyder's directorial style would have benefited greatly with some of William's magic.

Avatar image for encephalon
#16 Edited by Encephalon (1667 posts) -

It is an incredibly uneven film, in some parts an outright bad one. That said, my face lit up with glee every time the Kryptonian lady showed up. She was fucking great.

Avatar image for darkshaper
#17 Posted by DarkShaper (1378 posts) -

I really liked it. It had some pacing problems to be sure. But after Dark Knight Rises and Green Lantern it felt good to enjoy a DC movie again.

Avatar image for strife777
#18 Edited by Strife777 (2079 posts) -

I wouldn't say I loved it, but I liked it a lot. I'm personally fine with it being a bit somber, it's a fresh take on the character. Some of the action scenes were a bit of a mess at points, making it hard to make out what was happening, but it could've been worse. I also would've liked Superman to acknowledge the damages he did alongside Zod.

Otherwise I thought it was a great movie for one of my least favorite superhero, they actually made me like him a little.

Avatar image for freakache
#19 Posted by FreakAche (3048 posts) -

@darkshaper said:

I really liked it. It had some pacing problems to be sure. But after Dark Knight Rises and Green Lantern it felt good to enjoy a DC movie again.

DKR had problems, but I feel like calling it more flawed than Man of Steel is a stretch.

That being said, I thought Man of Steel was okay, although it kind of dragged at the end.

Avatar image for novis
#20 Edited by Novis (259 posts) -

I liked the angle they were going for with Superman, but there just wasn't enough time to let things sink it. Action looked great, though. Kinda like the actor for Superman. Didn't like the way they romanced Lois and Superman. Felt forced.

Avatar image for darkshaper
#21 Posted by DarkShaper (1378 posts) -

@darkshaper said:

I really liked it. It had some pacing problems to be sure. But after Dark Knight Rises and Green Lantern it felt good to enjoy a DC movie again.

DKR had problems, but I feel like calling it more flawed than Man of Steel is a stretch.

That being said, I thought Man of Steel was okay, although it kind of dragged at the end.

Honestly, I would say Man of Steel and DKR are about equally flawed. I just didn't enjoy DKR.

Avatar image for schmollian
#22 Edited by Schmollian (351 posts) -

Well it featured an absolutely obscene amount of CGI special effects and an absurd amount of explosions. That being said, it was worth the price of admission. A good Superman flick.

Avatar image for laserguy
#23 Edited by laserguy (550 posts) -

It was not a funny film. Nolan is not known for comedy, as a producer he probably pushed Zack to cut the comedy down, and keep it based in reality. It was a pretty good film overall. Nolan likes reality, thats why Batman wont hold up. Superheros in real time are boring. now bring on Darkseid. and the Legion of doom.

Avatar image for intro
#24 Edited by Intro (1269 posts) -

I really enjoyed it. Off Topic: Work at a theater and an old lady came out to refund her tickets because she didn't know Superman was so violent.

Avatar image for fredchuckdave
#25 Edited by Fredchuckdave (9928 posts) -

@intro: He's not supposed to demonstrate homicidal violence as a character, common nerdy criticism of the film. Though it can be distracting when you're destroying an entire city.

Avatar image for andorski
#26 Edited by Andorski (5480 posts) -

Good for the most part, but I felt like something was missing. Can't quite put my finger on it though...

Loved that for all the flying punches, throwing into buildings, and other superhuman fighting moves, the way Superman kills Zod is with an old fashioned neck snap.

Avatar image for tangoup
#27 Edited by TangoUp (327 posts) -

Recent super hero movies have the super hero meekly acquiesce to the military.

Soft power of cinema and all that ...

Avatar image for huntad
#28 Posted by huntad (2299 posts) -

Didn't wow me and kind of bored me a little. The beginning had some nice, touching moments though. Wish it kept a similar tone throughout.

Avatar image for laserguy
#29 Edited by laserguy (550 posts) -

Does that snap mean you could kill Superman the same way? Whats up with the glass's at the end? Didn't everyone already know who he was?

Avatar image for extomar
#30 Posted by EXTomar (5047 posts) -

I was having problems trying to describe my dissatisfaction with the movie until I came across MovieBob's review and his insight clicked: Man of Steel is like Dragonball Z without any whimsical or fun parts and a lot more of the "screaming for 15 minutes while punching".

Avatar image for djou
#31 Edited by djou (895 posts) -

It was okay. I was surprised by the structure of the movie, pretty sophisticated for a superhero movie, but it lead to numerous incoherent/logical flaws. eg Zod saying "There's only one way this can end..." then cutting a scene where he lists two ways. The cgi was a mixed bag, the sense of speed and scale was cool, but the rag doll bodies being thrown around looked silly and weightless.

I saw this on non-3D IMAX, maybe it was just my theater but the sound mix was goddamn deafening, even for a superhero movie. My eardrums were pummeled so severely my ears were ringing on the way out. When are composers going to give the constant trombone farting a rest?

I also don't know if I like that the script ripped off elements of the Matrix (genetically pre-determined utopian pod babies) and Mass Effect (Reaper-like war-machines that touch down on Earth and omit pulsating waves of energy)

@laserguy: Yeah, both Lois and Perry knew. I wish they left this out. Seemed like blatant fan service and sequel baiting.

Avatar image for andorski
#32 Posted by Andorski (5480 posts) -

@djou: Perry knows that Lois is aware of Superman's identity, but does he himself know that it's Clark Kent?

@extomar: There were more chuckles in the Dark Knight trilogy, which is saying something. If this is the tone that future DC movies will go in, they need to add a bit more humor to them. It doesn't need to go all the way into Marvel territory in terms of it being light-hearted, but a couple of quips and side jokes would definitely help.

Avatar image for wraxend
#33 Posted by Wraxend (615 posts) -

The film was really well directed but poorly written, apart from the first 20mins on Krypton, it was just lacking something for me. Having said that the fight scenes where lightyears ahead other action films. 3.5/5

Avatar image for oraknabo
#34 Posted by oraknabo (1733 posts) -

@djou said:

I also don't know if I like that the script ripped off elements of the Matrix (genetically pre-determined utopian pod babies) and Mass Effect (Reaper-like war-machines that touch down on Earth and omit pulsating waves of energy)

Most of those details of Krypton's history and technology were created long before those movies by mostly the 70s Superman writers like Elliott Maggin.

Avatar image for djou
#35 Posted by djou (895 posts) -

@andorski: I assumed he did since Lois had background notes visiting Kansas and Clark's mother which in turn lead to the leaking of the story and the direct naming of Lois as the source. So maybe... Lois didn't show Perry all her writing? Maybe she didn't write about it in her article? And that the internet writer didn't do any internet research? This was one of those logical flaws in the movie that seemed deaf to the way media works. Its fine to have some reasonable suspension of disbelief (we are dealing with sci-fi aliens) but the movie didn't address the way news spreads (through twitter, social media). Unless Lois was bankrolling her globetrotting expeditions out of pocket, you would think that Perry could look at her expense reports and see "oh, Lois went to x, y, then a cab to the Kent residence in Kansas and dropped the story, maybe something happened there?" Oh, I forgot this is a world where Clark Kent can put on a pair of glasses and tweed jacket to hide the fact that he has the physique of a bodybuilder and looks like Superman.

To me, this was the biggest problem of the movie, the tone was supposed to be more "realistic" but it required these logical leaps that didn't make much sense. The edits and fragmented structure were used to distract the viewer from basic common sense.

Avatar image for extomar
#36 Edited by EXTomar (5047 posts) -

Dark Knight Rises also had these illogical parts in an attempt to bring "realism" that sound neat but upon even a perfunctory glance the detail shows to be nonsense. The more I think about this movie the more disappointed I am in it and the news they already want to do a sequel. My only hope at this point is that a sequel can fix the problems by getting better....everything.

Avatar image for epidehl
#37 Edited by Epidehl (589 posts) -

I don't think I've disliked a movie, from top to bottom, more than this movie since maybe... Spider-man 3? Don't really feel like ranting about it but as someone that typically seems to like Superman more than most people I thought it was kind of a shit-show. Also, Superman killing Zod is wrong on so many levels it makes my brain hurt.

Avatar image for wampa1
#38 Edited by Wampa1 (831 posts) -

@laserguy: I'd assume you could break Superman's neck, but you'd need all the force of a Kryptonian to do it.

Avatar image for medacris
#39 Posted by medacris (738 posts) -

Dragged a little at the beginning and end, but otherwise, a perfect film.

However, I'm "that person" who also absolutely loved Watchmen and Sucker Punch, so keep that in mind.

Avatar image for rasmoss
#40 Posted by Rasmoss (569 posts) -

I loved it when they dragged Lois Lane aboard their space ship for no reason, so she could learn how to defeat them.

Avatar image for humanity
#41 Edited by Humanity (15612 posts) -
@medacris said:

Dragged a little at the beginning and end, but otherwise, a perfect film.

However, I'm "that person" who also absolutely loved Watchmen and Sucker Punch, so keep that in mind.

Nothing wrong with Watchmen. Sucker Punch is alright if you completely turn your brain off and just enjoy the action.

I haven't seen this movie but I'm curious how do they get around the whole Superman/Clark Kent thing? Does he really just put on some glasses and no one knows?

Avatar image for tylea002
#42 Posted by Tylea002 (2382 posts) -

As someone who appreciates storytelling, coherence, a through line and basically movies being good, I hated it.

Hated it doubly because there were good ideas, especially "Superman as metaphor for Autism" for one scene. They just did fuckin' nothing with any of them. Tone deaf movie with no sense of how to tell a story.

Avatar image for boj4ngles
#43 Edited by boj4ngles (302 posts) -

I thought it was good, not great but good. As with Snider's other work, it is more of a visual spectacle than anything else. Was the story incoherent or absent? Maybe at times it was, but I forgave that because the Superman mythos is already so familiar that the film can afford to appeal to us through alternative ways. I liked how it felt very cosmic, there was no question that Superman is an alien.

Avatar image for jacdg
#44 Posted by JacDG (2177 posts) -

I was pretty bored throughout the first half (disliked the way they handled the flashbacks and stuff, I was never really invested in Clark's childhood/youth) but once the action started getting going I thought it was amazingly fun, some genuinely great scenes.

Avatar image for thecreamfilling
#45 Posted by TheCreamFilling (1235 posts) -

I give it a solid 3/5. General Zod was the best character.

Avatar image for triple07
#46 Edited by triple07 (1255 posts) -

@humanity: Yeah he just puts on glasses, but to be fair most people never saw him so it kinda works. Of course the guy giving him the job DID see him as Superman but we'll let that slide as who wouldn't give superman a job?

Overall really enjoyed the movie. Thought the action was awesome and even though some of the story stuff didn't work out as well as I was hoping for, I still think it was a pretty good movie. I enjoyed it about as much as I did Iron Man 3 earlier this summer.

Avatar image for benny
#47 Edited by Benny (2009 posts) -

@triple07 said:

@humanity: Yeah he just puts on glasses, but to be fair most people never saw him so it kinda works. Of course the guy giving him the job DID see him as Superman but we'll let that slide as who wouldn't give superman a job?

Overall really enjoyed the movie. Thought the action was awesome and even though some of the story stuff didn't work out as well as I was hoping for, I still think it was a pretty good movie. I enjoyed it about as much as I did Iron Man 3 earlier this summer.

The final scene was honestly one of my favourite parts of the movie, I think because it almost promises a more human story in the future. I really hope this movie franchise continues and that they get a different director, that knows how to show proper build-up, proper pay-off and real depth.

Avatar image for mrmazz
#48 Posted by MrMazz (1179 posts) -

Love the early bits where it was all about our perception of the superman. Than it had to go all Transformers 3 at the end as only David Goyer can. Wish Snyder had cut a shorter film there is probably a much better 2 hour or lil under film in there. that Smallville fight was great but than all of that just got washed over with sameness due to an hour of action. What makes things super or uniqe is the limited nature of it. Superman taking off an learning to fly GREAT scene that is undercut by him just casually doing it now. There were some GREAT ideas in there and than it just got washed away.

Avatar image for megalombax
#49 Posted by MegaLombax (457 posts) -

@rasmoss said:

I loved it when they dragged Lois Lane aboard their space ship for no reason, so she could learn how to defeat them.

I also had problems with part, they seemingly dragged her into their spaceship just to shove her into an empty room with that control panel. Although, there was that one part where Lois mentioned that they went into her mind to search things about Clark. I'm assuming thats how they figured out how to find Clark's phallus shaped spacecraft at the Kent farm.