Well, lets use videogames to help me try and give a point of perspective. If a programmer makes a world that lacks a most of the systems that applies to our world but does create a fairly intelligent A.I system, that can evolve, at this point we are dealing with a creator-sentient being situation we are in now. To the A.I, who argue of the non-existence of the creator, they may use some of the logic of the world to dispute the very existance of the creator. But that would be preposterous, because the programmer clearly programmed that code. It didn't just spontaneously adjust its own settings to create new engines for physics and what not. If it did, then that would be the work of the programmer to do so. Even if single word of what "scientists" say is true, that only means the things they found were true, not that the program programmed itself into existance, and all the systems and expanding harddrive space is spontaneously that way. And that also means that the all the logic and concepts that the A.I understands, is already known by the programmer and then some, i.e. concepts that were never programmed into the world. Science can not predict the existance of god, because all of science studies what God created.
God is not some guy who is only as intelligent as the ppl who first wrote the books. They did not have the level of knowledge to understand the science we have now. In a sense, it would HAVE to be dumbed down for them. The first words ever spoken to Prophet Muhammed was "read". There is a huge emphasis on knowledge in the Quran. To learn and explore the world for its knowledge. God, according to that book, want ppl to always use there time to not to be idle(not for the catholic reason either) because on the day u die, you will be asked what u accomplished with wat u were given. Would u not say that saying that you discovered the laws of physics (which would forever benefit man) be looking good on ur record. Of course its not JUST about if u were bad or good in life.
To tie this back to the example, lets say that the programmer tried to make the games that run on a ps3 on a nintendo (O.G). The level of code and amount of stuff involved is too much for the nes to handle. Or if the programmer coded in Cobalt ( i think thats a dead language and assuming it does not have objects), and tried to involve object oriented programming in that. It would not work out for him. Object oriented programming would only be possible in newer languages(i.e. our new age science). And so the programmer would have to make the closest equivalent that could work in the language. so i.e. the concept of genetic code. the concept of nuclear physics(protons, neutrons, electrons). the very fact that there is an invisible substance in the air made of multiple objects. Back then they most likely thought that Light was projected from there eyes in the day time and that was how they saw.
Finally, the reason why this world has all those sucky things, is bc its a test. I know it sounds lame. But think about it, are test EVER a fun thing to do? The point is, if u suffer here, u will be repaid in the afterlife(good grade, for lack of a better word). And saying that they are cowards is too much. Do have any idea what some ppl go thru on a day to day basis?? I assume u are like me. Living in a lower to higher middle class lifestyle in a western country. If a person needs rely on something to keep them from going crazy, let them, u do realize most of the world lives in poverty?
So i choose to believe there is a god, because there is almost no way for a scientist to prove that god doesnt exist. There is no instrument of knowledge that can go past that computer screen and touch the face of the programmer. The matter we A.I are made of are totally different from his. And the fact is that he has true power to adjust anything and monitor anything. I would love to see someone create an A.I for this purpose, to see if the A.I decide there is a programmer or not.
Log in to comment