Star Trek, obviously. And I'm a Star Wars fan.
I second this, and I also don't hock Trek.
@MrBubbles: The real question here is which universe violates physics more.
Star Wars has all kinds of stuff that is physically impossible: "hyperdrive", magical healing waters, impossible energy outputs from tiny ships, etc.
Star Trek is similar: Warp drive, magical scanners that heal all ailments, "beaming" (which violates so many laws the show had to address it by creating "Heisenberg compensators" as part of the transporter LOL), etc.
So lets compare a limited selection:
So in this totally scientific and not made up analysis: Star Trek barely edges out Star Wars. Feel free to add your own ideas in and tilt the score how you see fit. Especially given how close it is atm.
EDIT: I have too much free time.
I'd add lightsabers and their blaster weapons to that list of what violates the laws of physics because the amount of power required to contain and control the plasma of the lightsaber and not have it melt your face and arms off while you're holding it. That kind of power (in the electrical sense) seems almost impossible to squeeze into something that literally fits in the palm of your hand which they've had the capabilities to do for well over 4,000 years. The same goes with Star Trek's phasers. I don't know as much about the Star Trek weaponry as I do Star Wars' but i think that would be a good point to touch on as well.
@DoctorDanger99: The Death Star is probably the one thing that Wars has over Trek. I'm a huge fan of Star Wars and at least a passing fan of most Star Trek, but when you compare similar technologies, Trek wins the straight up technology race hands down. For instance...
The Millennium Falcon, one of the fastest ships in the Star Wars universe, will "make .5 past light speed." That means it goes one and half times the speed of light. The higher warp factors of the Enterprise (pick any model) go thousands of times the speed of light.
Any given blaster in Star Wars acts more like projectile shooting weapons than actual laser guns. No laser beam should, A. have a discernable beginning, middle and end, B. be dodge-able/block-able (Light speed, remember) or C. do nothing more than punch a small, squib shaped hole in things and not punch ALL THE WAY THROUGH. Star Trek phasers can stun, wound AND disintegrate at the highest setting, even the measly deck of card sized ones in TNG, et. al.
Do I really have to say this one? I will, since I brought it up. Leia shows up as a wavy, blue, CRT lined image projected by a trash can. "Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, this hologram blows!" Holodecks in Star Trek are completely realized, three dimensional, tactile worlds that you would be hard pressed to notice are not 100% real.
Star Trek has 'em; Star Wars don't. 'Nuff said.
Star Wars is a huge canon, covering literally tens of thousands of years. However, all the technologies listed above have seemed to be utterly changeless since the time of the Old Republic, about 25,000 years prior to the events of the original trilogy (For you Star Wars geeks, that's 25,000 BBY). Blasters still blast, ships still go at about the same speed (and smugglers still have the faster ships... curious), holograms still suck and transporters are not a common use item. Now look at Trek. In the time of the original series, flip phones were still in use, food came from slots in the wall, ships were a crew of a couple hundred and no one had found the Borg yet. Since then, communicators are badge sized, food is created via transporter technology, huge ships can have thousands of crew members and the Borg made for an awesome eight movie.
I love Star Wars deeply, but in this instance, Trek wins easily. They may not have lightsabers or Death Stars, but they've got enough cool stuff to make up for it. May the Force be with you and Live Long or Die Hard. :P
Use your keyboard!
Log in to comment