U. Other
Who is the Deadliest Warrior?
Since the Persian is Immortal, I guess it would be him.
But I'll have to go with my blood and my ancestors, so Viking all the way.
Knights are awesome. Wish i could experience chanting and charging on a battlefield while wielding a sword and shield and wearing heavy armor. *starts Mount and Blade*
the romans were champions of conquest for nearly a thousand years, I think they knew their shit pretty well
I'd go with musketeer because they have a gun. Armour dosn't stand a chance against it if it hits and it would likely confuse people unfamiliar with the weapon. But the deadliest warrior thing is highly subjective, weather conditions, time of day, individual differences between people within the said periods, arbitrary luck of the moment, etc. Maybe one fumbles or makes a mistake. I suppose the Spartan stands a good chance if he brings along seven slaves with him, they were rather big slave holder and liked to bring a whole lot of them into the field with them.
Spartan. By that I mean Spartan.
Mujahadeen because they fight for god and for the almighty Muhammad in defending the Islamic caliphate.
That dude who rode the atomic bomb.
I would also vote for that spanish guy from the second deadliest warrior QL. "Come on, we can be friends!"
@NegativeCero said:
I went with Mongol because they scared the shit out of Europeans for a while.
Yeah, the Mongol Empire got pretty big so I'm giving the nod to them. Some of these other dudes never challenged anyone outside their own country.
@Gargantuan said:
Musketeer since he has a gun, otherwise a late period knight would win
During the times of "Empire" it had multiple cases of enemy armes (without guns) loosing tens of thousands and the British army loosing less than two hundred.
Technology is the winner, always.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment