Zombieland: Greatest Zombie flick ever?

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By ch3burashka

No, I don't believe it is, but I was very impressed at how it delivered a fun experience condensed into less than two hours; it kept up a rhythm of revelations and zombie-killings so as to not bore the audience, and they succeeded. 
 
Do you (yes, you!) have any thoughts on it, besides OMG IT WAS COOL? As for me, the actor cameo was hilarious. Too bad s/he got killed off so quickly.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

#2  Edited By Yummylee

I dunno where this movie came from all of a sudden =S slipped me by and suddenly i see forums and blogs referin to it everywere. Maybe it isn't released in the UK theatres yet.
Avatar image for aperturesilence
ApertureSilence

1184

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#3  Edited By ApertureSilence

Zombieland was a very diverting movie, but in no way is it even close to being the "Greatest Zombie flick ever". It's not even the greatest zombie comedy (or "zomedy", as I like to call them). That honor belongs to Shawn of the Dead.

Avatar image for sam_lfcfan
Sam_lfcfan

321

Forum Posts

74

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By Sam_lfcfan

Zombieland just beats out Shaun of the Dead for me because it's a more fun movie. 

Avatar image for imperiousrix
ImperiousRix

3095

Forum Posts

1964

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 4

#5  Edited By ImperiousRix

It's definitely a "fun" zombie movie, one that's probably more accessible to a mass audience. 
As for greatest?  No, not even close.  Shaun of the Dead I felt was funnier AND more true to the zombie sub-genre, and the George A. Romero movies are pretty much the standard for zombie movies. 
Still pretty good, though.

Avatar image for hatking
hatking

7673

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By hatking

I enjoyed it far more than I thought I would.  It had a lot of that kind of awkward guy humor that Jesse Eisenberg is real good at... 
probably because he is an awkward guy.  Also it dodged the bullet of too many zombie movie cliches.  It is a different type of "zomedy" than Shaun of the Dead, as that was more of a parody of zombie movies, this was just a straight forward zombie movie that had funny moments.
Avatar image for iam3green
iam3green

14368

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By iam3green

i really enjoyed the movie i thought it was like shaun od the dead. it was just really great movie. 
 
i made a thread i think it might be on the second page of me saying i saw zombieland.

Avatar image for williamrlbaker
WilliamRLBaker

4941

Forum Posts

1420

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By WilliamRLBaker

hmmm i liked it ti was good, but it wasn't the best, the story sort of fell a little towards the end, and as soon as the girls showed it was like retardation spread around even to the girls them selves.  I mean damn the guys kept getting screwed over by the girls then it spread to the girls...

And i thought it was going to be about....
Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By ch3burashka
@WilliamRLBaker: If they covered all the rules, I'm sure it'd get annoying as shit. They covered the most important and most relevant ones. That's that.
 
And the first spoiler, a complete WTF moment: agreed.
Avatar image for scubasteve2010
scubasteve2010

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By scubasteve2010

I really enjoyed Z-land. I felt like there very few if any needless or wasteful shots. I actually walked out of the theater wanting maybe another ten to twenty minutes, which I find rare. Also don't let the trailers fool you, this movie has some quite gory moments. However with the comedic approach they took with this zombie flick, the gore never feels excessive or brutal for the sake of brutal. Also...  
 

   Overall I would say a strong 4 out of 5. 
 


Avatar image for rjayb89
rjayb89

7813

Forum Posts

9437

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 17

#11  Edited By rjayb89
Avatar image for williamrlbaker
WilliamRLBaker

4941

Forum Posts

1420

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By WilliamRLBaker
@CH3BURASHKA said:
" @WilliamRLBaker: If they covered all the rules, I'm sure it'd get annoying as shit. They covered the most important and most relevant ones. That's that.  And the first spoiler, a complete WTF moment: agreed. "
I dont think id get annoying, I think it would set a great president it would have been an educational, comical zombie movie.
 
as for that the zombies in this flick just aren't my kind of zombies, I like undead flesh/brain eaters with no intelligence.
these seemed to be another trend of zombie the alive, rabid kind.
Avatar image for dcfgs3
DCFGS3

1084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#13  Edited By DCFGS3

While fun, I think it's a shame the Zombie genre has become so campy, I guess it was inevitable though. Gimme some guns, soldiers and zombies any day.

Avatar image for end_boss
End_Boss

3386

Forum Posts

385

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#14  Edited By End_Boss
@CH3BURASHKA said:

" No, I don't believe it is, but I was very impressed at how it delivered a fun experience condensed into less than two hours; it kept up a rhythm of revelations and zombie-killings so as to not bore the audience, and they succeeded.   Do you (yes, you!) have any thoughts on it, besides OMG IT WAS COOL? As for me, the actor cameo was hilarious. Too bad s/he got killed off so quickly. "

No, I'm afraid greatest zombie flick ever goes to 28 Days Later.
 
Well, in my world anyways.
 
@DCFGS3 said:
" While fun, I think it's a shame the Zombie genre has become so campy, I guess it was inevitable though. Gimme some guns, soldiers and zombies any day. "

Just wait for the World War Z movie. The Yonkers scene is gonna' be bananas.
Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Branthog

Zombieland is a very enjoyable romp, but in no way the best zombie film ever. Note even remotely fucking close. Anyone who feels it's the greatest zombie flick ever either huffs jenkem, hasn't seen many zombie movies, or is one of those idiots who goes around calling every movie they've seen the "greatest movie ever!" . . . until the next movie they watch.

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By Branthog
@End_Boss said:
" @CH3BURASHKA said:

" No, I don't believe it is, but I was very impressed at how it delivered a fun experience condensed into less than two hours; it kept up a rhythm of revelations and zombie-killings so as to not bore the audience, and they succeeded.   Do you (yes, you!) have any thoughts on it, besides OMG IT WAS COOL? As for me, the actor cameo was hilarious. Too bad s/he got killed off so quickly. "

No, I'm afraid greatest zombie flick ever goes to 28 Days Later. 
 
Not zombies -- infected! Actually, for that matter, there are no zombies in Zombieland, either as they too are merely infected.
 
And as Max Brooks himself said "there are two kinds of zombies -- the slow moving zombies based on the scientific principal of necrotic flesh and cold circulatory systems slowing their movement . . . and the stupid ones".
Avatar image for turbo_toaster
turbo_toaster

1056

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#17  Edited By turbo_toaster

I found that there was a pretty substantial lack of zombies. I thought it would be more about how they come up with unique ways to kill them (hence the trailers emphasizing the "Zombie Kill of the Week"). Woody and Bill Murray were the redeeming aspects of that movie.

Avatar image for afroman269
Afroman269

7440

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#18  Edited By Afroman269
@WilliamRLBaker said:
" hmmm i liked it ti was good, but it wasn't the best, the story sort of fell a little towards the end, and as soon as the girls showed it was like retardation spread around even to the girls them selves.  I mean damn the guys kept getting screwed over by the girls then it spread to the girls...
And i thought it was going to be about....
"
Ya I agree. They something interesting going with the rules but they stopped short. Reasons why I like this though is that people are not completely stupid around zombies and know what to do except for that one part at the *cough* theme park. My only other problem is that the movie needed a bit more zombies. The middle of the movie got kinda boring.
Avatar image for emandudeguyperson
Emandudeguyperson

2749

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 6

I enjoyed it a bunch, though it could've been 45 minutes longer.

Avatar image for gunstarred
GunstarRed

6071

Forum Posts

1893

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 10

#20  Edited By GunstarRed

It was enjoyable, not even close to being as fun or clever as shaun of the dead. Woody Harrelson  makes it  a better movie, his character is kinda awesome. 
 
The "regrets" line is absolutely genius.
Avatar image for torus
torus

1106

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By torus

I too felt it was a bit short. I enjoyed it, even though it was by no means great cinema.

Avatar image for guiseppe
guiseppe

2843

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#22  Edited By guiseppe

Too short, but loved the cameo although I don't get why he would do what he did :P. I mean... Yeah.

Avatar image for aperturesilence
ApertureSilence

1184

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#23  Edited By ApertureSilence
@guiseppe: He was stoned.
Avatar image for end_boss
End_Boss

3386

Forum Posts

385

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#24  Edited By End_Boss
@Branthog said:
" @End_Boss said:
" @CH3BURASHKA said:

" No, I don't believe it is, but I was very impressed at how it delivered a fun experience condensed into less than two hours; it kept up a rhythm of revelations and zombie-killings so as to not bore the audience, and they succeeded.   Do you (yes, you!) have any thoughts on it, besides OMG IT WAS COOL? As for me, the actor cameo was hilarious. Too bad s/he got killed off so quickly. "

No, I'm afraid greatest zombie flick ever goes to 28 Days Later. 
 
Not zombies -- infected! Actually, for that matter, there are no zombies in Zombieland, either as they too are merely infected.  And as Max Brooks himself said "there are two kinds of zombies -- the slow moving zombies based on the scientific principal of necrotic flesh and cold circulatory systems slowing their movement . . . and the stupid ones". "
Max Brooks is a great author, but in no way would I consider him the be-all end-all of zombie enthusiasts. Also, making such a silly distinction between the two kinds of zombies is just a little pretentious.
Avatar image for themustachehero
TheMustacheHero

6647

Forum Posts

120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By TheMustacheHero
@Emandudeguyperson said:
" I enjoyed it a bunch, though it could've been 45 minutes longer. "
At the end it hinted at there being a second one because he said "For now.."
Avatar image for chaser324
chaser324

9415

Forum Posts

14945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 15

#26  Edited By chaser324  Moderator
@iam3green: I really don't like seeing Zombieland being compared to Shaun of the Dead. I feel like they are very different movies. Shaun of the Dead is more of a parody of the zombie film genre. Zombieland on the other hand is a straight up comedic zombie movie. Most of the comedy in Zombieland doesn't come from making fun of Zombie movie conventions like Shaun of the Dead.
 
Having said that, I think Zombieland is an incredibly fun movie. Everyone should definitely see it.
Avatar image for starfry64
StarFry64

185

Forum Posts

518

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By StarFry64

I agree that Zombieland is better than Shaun of the Dead (especially the pacing's better) but I wouldn't say it's the best zombie flick ever. Are you saying you're discounting [REC] or Dawn of the Dead?