#1 Posted by The_Laughing_Man (13629 posts) -

Confirmed today that you no longer have to type in those pain in the ass redeem codes. Kinect can scan in a QR code for you

http://m.ign.com/articles/2013/07/01/xbox-one-kinect-will-scan-redemption-codes

#2 Posted by connerthekewlkid (1849 posts) -

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

#3 Posted by Grilledcheez (3955 posts) -

That's awesome, anything to lessen the amount of inconvenience I have!

#4 Posted by Video_Game_King (36272 posts) -

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

#5 Edited by TruthTellah (9396 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

heh. I'm guessing there are other reasons besides just this for having it be a part of the system. But yeah, they still have a ways to go in making that more compelling argument.

Still, this is nice.

Online
#6 Edited by Coafi (1490 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

I completely agree, you took the words from my innocent mouth.

Goodbye, 25 digit codes!

#7 Posted by DoctorTran (1570 posts) -

@video_game_king: weak but welcomed. I've been dreaming about this ever since the Xbox Vision was released.

#8 Posted by connerthekewlkid (1849 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

Well yeah its nice, but I just always thought people thought they were dumb, but also I don't think this is the main thing they will try to justify Kinect with.

Also you went a whole post without embedding a JRPG OST in it, whats happening man?

#9 Edited by falserelic (5480 posts) -

Well that's good for future xbox one owners...

#10 Posted by vorpalparasite (302 posts) -

Vinny is going to be psyched.

#11 Posted by ThePickle (4189 posts) -

Still doesn't justify the mandatory Kinect requirement.

#12 Posted by OurSin_360 (941 posts) -

Well, at least they finally found one good use for the kinect, but couldn't they just put into the smartglass and we could just scan it with a phone like every other app?

#13 Edited by TechnoSyndrome (950 posts) -

You mean I have to get up off my ass to redeem my digital content now? UUUUUGH

#14 Posted by Nikoran (165 posts) -

But are you willing to sacrifice your privacy for convenience?

#15 Posted by connerthekewlkid (1849 posts) -

Well, at least they finally found one good use for the kinect, but couldn't they just put into the smartglass and we could just scan it with a phone like every other app?

You are implying anybody uses smartglass.

#16 Posted by Grixxel (769 posts) -

Well good to know the Kinect will have another useful thing attached to it.

#17 Posted by TruthTellah (9396 posts) -

@video_game_king said:

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

Well yeah its nice, but I just always thought people thought they were dumb, but also I don't think this is the main thing they will try to justify Kinect with.

Also you went a whole post without embedding a JRPG OST in it, whats happening man?

Video_game_king is evolving!

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bjm9rFz2Muo/0.jpg

Online
#18 Posted by EvilNiGHTS (1093 posts) -

KILLER APP.

#19 Posted by connerthekewlkid (1849 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid said:

@video_game_king said:

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

Well yeah its nice, but I just always thought people thought they were dumb, but also I don't think this is the main thing they will try to justify Kinect with.

Also you went a whole post without embedding a JRPG OST in it, whats happening man?

Video_game_king is evolving!

Did you just have a picture of Eevee evolving on a Spanish version of Pokemon in your folder?

#20 Posted by Subjugation (4728 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid said:

QR codes just refuse to die don't they?

Well, in this instance, they're actually adding something practical. Also, a weak justification for mandatory Kinect.

I don't think it was ever supposed to be "justification" for the Kinect, more just utilizing something they know they will have available. I think it's a great idea in theory.

#21 Posted by Video_Game_King (36272 posts) -
#22 Posted by The_Laughing_Man (13629 posts) -

@truthtellah: it's mandatory to try and push devs to use it.

#23 Posted by carlthenimrod (1597 posts) -

That's rad.

#24 Posted by Ley_Lines (259 posts) -

@oursin_360 said:

Well, at least they finally found one good use for the kinect, but couldn't they just put into the smartglass and we could just scan it with a phone like every other app?

You are implying anybody uses smartglass.

I use it to see if my friends are online, but that's it.

#25 Posted by Fheonix (17 posts) -

Am I the only one thinking people are just going to start randomly scanning QR codes to see if they yield free goods? It'll be just like the Monster Rancher titles on the PSX.

#26 Posted by Humanity (9825 posts) -

That is honestly awesome, I can't wait until I finally don't have to put in stupid CD keys. I've been waiting for this since 1996.

#27 Posted by Village_Guy (2656 posts) -

yay

#28 Posted by Wuddel (2098 posts) -

I never understood why you just can have a companion app for smartphones. Well it would be Windows Phone ...

#29 Edited by KaneRobot (1783 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid: I use Smartglass frequently. Much better to use that to check your friends list than either turning on your Xbox or PC. Also the easiest way to check achievements and edit your avatar.

#30 Posted by Dagbiker (6978 posts) -

XBOX ONE: WELCOME TO 2009

#31 Posted by EXTomar (4916 posts) -

This is something Microsoft should have been doing with Kinect from the start. You should have been able to do things like hold up things like points card to the camera to add it to your account.

#32 Posted by MideonNViscera (2257 posts) -

Thank fuck. Buying a new game, especially a pre-ordered Collector's Edition, is such a fucking pain in the ass due to all the codes.

#33 Posted by MideonNViscera (2257 posts) -

@connerthekewlkid: I use Smartglass frequently. Much better to use that to check your friends list than either turning on your Xbox or PC. Also the easiest way to check achievements and edit your avatar.

It was better when it was just the X-Box Live app though, before Smartglass.

#34 Posted by ajamafalous (12121 posts) -
#35 Posted by xyzygy (10062 posts) -

I think this is a pretty awesome idea. It's like the Skylanders of codes.

#36 Edited by Soapy86 (2638 posts) -

Kinect is finally good for something.

#37 Posted by meaninoflife42 (534 posts) -

One one hand: good fucking riddance, on the other hand: I have to use the Kinect to scan in QR codes. Why must good news come with shitty news right after?

#38 Posted by Flappy (2328 posts) -
@fheonix said:

Am I the only one thinking people are just going to start randomly scanning QR codes to see if they yield free goods? It'll be just like the Monster Rancher titles on the PSX.

Nothing quite like getting a spiffy new monster from my sister's Spice Girls & Usher CDs.

#39 Posted by themonkeyworks (71 posts) -

Its amazing the hate for the kinect. Admittedly the current kinect is a bust, with the only kinect based game that I've enjoyed being 'Gunslinger'. But I really enjoyed playing ME3 with the voice recognition for my squads movements.

I would need to see some facts proving that game developers would HAVE to use the kinect purely because the kinect is mandatory.

Sometimes its nice to be naive and excited about the xbox one, maybe enjoy the evolving creature that is the new generation of consoles and not be predictably cynical months before the system is released.

#40 Posted by SpaceInsomniac (3881 posts) -

Its amazing the hate for the kinect. Admittedly the current kinect is a bust, with the only kinect based game that I've enjoyed being 'Gunslinger'. But I really enjoyed playing ME3 with the voice recognition for my squads movements.

I would need to see some facts proving that game developers would HAVE to use the kinect purely because the kinect is mandatory.

Sometimes its nice to be naive and excited about the xbox one, maybe enjoy the evolving creature that is the new generation of consoles and not be predictably cynical months before the system is released.

When games are made for a PC, the developers have as many buttons as there are keys on a keyboard to work with. When games are made on the PS3 or 360, developers have the same amount of buttons to work with for either.

When games will be made for the PS4, developers will have just as many buttons AND a touch pad. When those same games will be made for the Xbox One, developers will have just as many buttons AND kinect voice recognition / hand gestures.

The idea isn't that developers will HAVE to use kinect because it's there. The idea is that developers will HAVE to use kinect because it's their only option.

You mentioned ME3. The same button was used to run, take cover, and revive teammates in that game, and it felt awful at times trying to revive a teammate only to find yourself taking cover instead. Very poorly designed aspect of that game. So let's say that Bioware dedicates a specific button to reviving teammates in ME4.

On PS4, that could mean a quick tap to the right side of the touchpad, or a quick "down to up" swipe on the touchpad. On the Xbox One, that same command would either have to be a voice command, a motion of your hand, or it would use the same system as ME3 and not have a dedicated button.

THIS is what people mean when they say that developers will HAVE to use kinect.

#41 Posted by Levio (1785 posts) -

I bet by the time Kinect 3 comes out (maybe 3 years from the X1 launch?), Kinect will have enough cool features in place and will be precise enough that suddenly gamers will be clamoring for it.

Kinect 2 will be the generation that has to pave the way to that point with a ton of little convenience updates like these.

#42 Posted by SomeDeliCook (2341 posts) -

Those codes take like 30 seconds to type in on a keyboard, which is much shorter than it will take for Kinect to warmup, recognize who is in the room, and try to scan but oops it is too dark you must redo.

Plus redeem codes are like serial keys from the 90's, its all nostalgic

#43 Posted by themonkeyworks (71 posts) -

@themonkeyworks said:

Its amazing the hate for the kinect. Admittedly the current kinect is a bust, with the only kinect based game that I've enjoyed being 'Gunslinger'. But I really enjoyed playing ME3 with the voice recognition for my squads movements.

I would need to see some facts proving that game developers would HAVE to use the kinect purely because the kinect is mandatory.

Sometimes its nice to be naive and excited about the xbox one, maybe enjoy the evolving creature that is the new generation of consoles and not be predictably cynical months before the system is released.

When games are made for a PC, the developers have as many buttons as there are keys on a keyboard to work with. When games are made on the PS3 or 360, developers have the same amount of buttons to work with for either.

When games will be made for the PS4, developers will have just as many buttons AND a touch pad. When those same games will be made for the Xbox One, developers will have just as many buttons AND kinect voice recognition / hand gestures.

The idea isn't that developers will HAVE to use kinect because it's there. The idea is that developers will HAVE to use kinect because it's their only option.

You mentioned ME3. The same button was used to run, take cover, and revive teammates in that game, and it felt awful at times trying to revive a teammate only to find yourself taking cover instead. Very poorly designed aspect of that game. So let's say that Bioware dedicates a specific button to reviving teammates in ME4.

On PS4, that could mean a quick tap to the right side of the touchpad, or a quick "down to up" swipe on the touchpad. On the Xbox One, that same command would either have to be a voice command, a motion of your hand, or it would use the same system as ME3 and not have a dedicated button.

THIS is what people mean when they say that developers will HAVE to use kinect.

Once again, you say HAVE to use.

If there was no kinect you'd be stuck with your problem of one button or using microsoft surface. I must admit I never had that issue with ME3 but have definitely had it with other games. All developers, 'in the past' admittedly, have used kinect as an optional. And I imagine it will continue to be that way because there needs to be an option, especially for people who are mute or amputees.

I think the decision is down to the developers ability to come up with a solution rather than blaming microsoft for developing their own interface, which is developmental yes, but eventually as others have said it may be something we love. The fact is kinect is an option to use, not a HAVE to, even if microsoft pay developers to use the device there will always be another key option.

#44 Posted by themonkeyworks (71 posts) -

Those codes take like 30 seconds to type in on a keyboard, which is much shorter than it will take for Kinect to warmup, recognize who is in the room, and try to scan but oops it is too dark you must redo.

Plus redeem codes are like serial keys from the 90's, its all nostalgic

your kinect 2.0 will always be connected cookie