Would you buy a subsidized Xbox One?

  • 63 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for blu3v3nom07
Blu3V3nom07

4518

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

If they announce a subsidized $200, $250, or $300 model, would you buy it?

What I'm wondering is that, would you have to get this subsidized model from like 'Time Warner/Comcast,' or Microsoft Store? They do this subsidized model now for the 360.

I ordered an XONE from Amazon, just in case I'm not able to order a subsidized model. I don't have cable, so I wonder if you would need like digital cable to buy that model.

Also, I bet they would announce a subsidized model like in July or August, before the November release date.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

#2  Edited By Hailinel

Nope. It would still have the same DRM bullshit issues.

Avatar image for mrfluke
mrfluke

6260

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@hailinel said:

Nope. It would still have the same DRM bullshit issues.

Avatar image for warfare
Warfare

1690

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@mrfluke said:

@hailinel said:

Nope. It would still have the same DRM bullshit issues.

Avatar image for waffles13
Waffles13

622

Forum Posts

128

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Subsidized by cable companies? Hell no.

If they said it was $200-300 and you are required to pay for 2-3 years of Xbox Live Gold, I would in a heartbeat, even if they said it was an increased price for "subsidized" subscribers.

I realize the math on that doesn't add up for them, but I can dream, right?

Avatar image for andorski
Andorski

5482

Forum Posts

2310

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By Andorski

Nope. I never really understood the appeal of buying something subsidized. Phones are the only exception since your monthly bill will be the same even if you go with an unlocked phone. I rather purchase something outright at a cheaper price than to pay more for it over an extended period of time. I feel like that just makes sense, no?

Avatar image for ajamafalous
ajamafalous

13992

Forum Posts

905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Price is not the issue; it's all the bullshit surrounding and integral to the console itself.

Avatar image for joshwent
joshwent

2897

Forum Posts

2987

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Since the PS4 is $100 less on release, just wait a few months and Microsoft is sure to drop the price of the One as soon as they can after release. (still not sure why anyone would want that thing, though)

Avatar image for deactivated-601df795ee52f
deactivated-601df795ee52f

3618

Forum Posts

6548

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

If it didn't have the stupid DRM I'd pay the full $500 without batting an eye.

Avatar image for sergio
Sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Nope. I'd still end up paying the same amount, if not more.

Avatar image for soap
Soap

3774

Forum Posts

1811

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 29

#11  Edited By Soap

If it was subsidized to like... -£300 then maybe... and then I'd use it as a door stop.

Avatar image for fluxwavez
FluxWaveZ

19845

Forum Posts

19798

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

It'd be more expensive in the long run and still have the DRM bullshit.

No.

Avatar image for blu3v3nom07
Blu3V3nom07

4518

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#13  Edited By Blu3V3nom07

http://www.trueachievements.com/a29674/zero-hour-vip-achievement.htm

360 had a similar Zero Hour achievement. I think Zero Hour was supposed to be this launch event in Vegas, or like the desert?

You would get either an achievement, or a 360 launch goodie. I think Burnie Burns, from Rooster teeth, got a hoodie. His name is really 'Michael,' you know?

Avatar image for starvinggamer
StarvingGamer

11533

Forum Posts

36428

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 25

#14  Edited By StarvingGamer

Nope, it still wouldn't have any exclusives I gave a fuck about.

Avatar image for thepickle
ThePickle

4704

Forum Posts

14415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Avatar image for hunter5024
Hunter5024

6708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

If I did get an Xbox it would just be for a small handful of games like the 360 I have now. So paying every month for something I only use a couple of times a year sounds stupid. Currently the only way I could see myself picking one up is if there's a few price cuts, after a couple years once they've built up a little collection of exclusive games I'd like to play.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#17  Edited By SpaceInsomniac

If MS made kinect optional, would I buy an Xbox One? No.

If MS did away with their DRM, would I buy an Xbox One? No.

Why? Because MS WANTED to screw me out of my property rights, and then they decided to do it. Too late, that bridge is burned. Get some new executives, pull your head out of your ass, start caring what your customers think, and maybe we'll talk in seven or so years at the start of the next console generation. I don't even own a PS3, but I'm sure going to own a PS4.

Avatar image for boj4ngles
boj4ngles

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By boj4ngles

If you're primarily worried about value for your dollar then the price of the console is really insignificant compared to the DRM issues. On Xbox One you will have already spent the value of your console after 10 game purchases. Without effective options to buy used games or share games, you are going to be spending substantially more money to play then you do today. I've spent at least $1,000 on games for my xbox360, and probably more. A substantial portion of those were used. It'd probably have been $2,000 if I'd gotten everything new.

As long as MS keeps restrictive DRM policies, PS4 will continue to be a better deal.

Avatar image for geirr
geirr

4166

Forum Posts

717

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

I might get it in a few years if there's any good single player exclusives to justify the purchase. So, no. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Avatar image for sticky_pennies
Sticky_Pennies

2092

Forum Posts

308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Avatar image for fourwude
FourWude

2274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By FourWude

Lol Microsoft is gonna struggle giving its XBoner away for free.

No one wants shit, even for free.

Long live Sony PS4. THE KING HAS RETURNED TO SAVE GAMING.

Avatar image for you_died
YOU_DIED

711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By YOU_DIED

Message to MS: remove the DRM bullshit and tons more people will buy your console, including me

Avatar image for sean2206
sean2206

278

Forum Posts

2197

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I'd prefer the rumoured option that wasn't announced with the around £15 payments for 2 years. They'd need to provide some kind of alternative option to convince me to buy one as the £429 price is already bullshit, shouldn't £499 equal something like £330? Personally I would buy a subsidized option or some kind of payment scheme option.

As for the DRM it's like Microsoft didn't hear the uproar over the past month Sony did and clearly outlined how their policies were different while Microsoft skipped over it entirely. Did they make any of the DRM stuff clear?

Avatar image for kkotd
kkotd

364

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If it were $199 for but required 2 or 3 years of Gold... maybe... but they won't do something that cheap, not immediately.

Avatar image for bigjeffrey
bigjeffrey

5282

Forum Posts

7872

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

$299

$12 a month for 2 years

Avatar image for willthemagicasian
WilltheMagicAsian

1548

Forum Posts

391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Probably, depends on how it's subsidized. It has some good games, decent controller and Forza. $500 just for Forza at the moment is a little much for me. Most of the other Xbox One exclusive stuff is getting a PC release so I'll picking up those versions anyway.

The DRM/always online stuff doesn't really bother me, because I mostly just play multiplayer games or games that require internet anyway and I never buy used games. I've never really had the option to return or lend games for quite a while now, probably the last time I lent out a PC game was Morrowind.

Avatar image for subyman
subyman

729

Forum Posts

2719

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Nope. I don't want the equivalent of a down payment on a damn console. Being locked into a service for 2 years while losing money is dumb. You can get a $35 one year live card from eBay. $499 is way too high for the Xbone. I'll do without and get a PS4.

Avatar image for dearpeptobismol
DEARPEPTOBISMOL

23

Forum Posts

81

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Since most likely it would end up costing you more, I wouldn't do it.

Avatar image for funkasaurasrex
FunkasaurasRex

854

Forum Posts

84

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By FunkasaurasRex

If it was subsidized through an Xbox live subscription I guess that would be a decent value, but honestly I'm just not interested in the Xbox One or the Xbox brand for that matter.

Avatar image for colinjw
colinjw

254

Forum Posts

194

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I don't know if it would be worth it.

Avatar image for schreiberty
schreiberty

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

if there was a 300 dollar package that came with a 2 year xbox live contract, then sure, paying 520$ in the long run would be worth the 200 dollars at the time. But im completely not interested in any sort of cable package.

Avatar image for kentonclay
KentonClay

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#32  Edited By KentonClay

Probably if it was included as part of an internet subscription deal, but not cable.

I never buy used as it is and I don't live in Pigshit, Alabama, so the always online thing doesn't really bother me.

Avatar image for impartialgecko
impartialgecko

1964

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 2

Nope. All installment plans suck no matter how you spin it. Also I don't watch TV that much so the One is useless to me as all I want to do is play games and it's not designed to do just that.

Avatar image for polygonslayer
PolygonSlayer

459

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By PolygonSlayer
Loading Video...

Avatar image for selfconfessedcynic
selfconfessedcynic

3005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Depends on the subsidies.

My opinion on the DRM / always-on - yes, it fucking sucks, but if there's a power outage, I'll just switch to Steam for the time being. If it's working 90% of the time, I'd rather focus on that instead of bitching about the 10%. The used game DRM stuff is a bit more concerning, but Steam already does it and we're all pretty satisfied with that.

Avatar image for andrewb
AndrewB

7816

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 16

Nope, because anyone who realizes the long-term pay increase over subsidized devices and still buys them is probably terrible with money, or has too much of it and could be putting the excess to better use.

Avatar image for scrumdidlyumptious
Scrumdidlyumptious

1679

Forum Posts

4386

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

No. I can't afford two subscriptions. Multiplatform games will also probably be better on the PS4 technically with less annoying restrictions. So what would I ever use the Xbox One for?

Avatar image for lowfyr
Lowfyr

22

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It'd be more expensive in the long run and still have the DRM bullshit.

No.

Avatar image for sunie
sunie

234

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By sunie

If, say, my triple-play subscription comes with a free Xbox One when I extend the contract (late in the cycle I mean, not right now) then I'm not gonna say no. I wouldn't pay extra though and in the end it'll probably still only be used for the little bit of TV I watch.

Avatar image for darkdragonmage99
darkdragonmage99

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

short answer HELL NO

long answer there is no reason in hell anyone should buy a subsidized version of anything hey pay less now but pay way more over time is not a good deal I have no idea why anyone could think it is.

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

If it's a recurring cost I'd consider taking on without the Xbox and not something I don't want, then sure, that's a win win.

Still, I've gotten by on one console for a long time now and I think this time, it's going to be Sony.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By Darji

It is not about the price. Hell I bought my Japanese 20GB launch PS3 for like 560 Euro XD

Avatar image for golguin
golguin

5471

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Avatar image for deactivated-630b11c195a3b
deactivated-630b11c195a3b

1072

Forum Posts

96

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Nope and even if I were to buy one it would be the full price xone without a contract.

Avatar image for professoress
ProfessorEss

7962

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#46  Edited By ProfessorEss

@ch3burashka said:

Depends on the subsidies.

Yeah, I can't really understand how anyone could say yes or no without any details.

Avatar image for jimbo7676
Jimbo7676

881

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@blu3v3nom07: no, I don't want to do some dumb contract and I don't really want one in the first place

Avatar image for euandewar
EuanDewar

5159

Forum Posts

136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

if i was to buy an xbox one (which i might still yet who knows) it would be the non-subsidised one

Avatar image for nekroskop
Nekroskop

2830

Forum Posts

47

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Subsidizing is the greatest scam ever. You're better off taking up a loan in a bank and buying it at a full price. The rates are probably better.

Avatar image for theking
TheKing

856

Forum Posts

232

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8