@Paul_Is_Drunk said:
@ShiftyMagicianHe had a similar negative viewpoint about the PS3 before he changed his mind. Take it with a grain of salt.
He said that it was difficult to program for, which is a pretty common viewpoint in the development comunity. That's why the rumor that Sony is droping the cell infrastructure on the next Playstation is so strong that even the GB crew mentions it.
Oh yea it was. As great in concept the cell processor was their next choice in CPU needs to be both powerful and is reasonable to develop for. If they try the cell again they need to make it easier to develop for and provide better support for developers. Will they do it right next time though? Who knows.
@believer258 said:
@ShiftyMagician said:
He had a similar negative viewpoint about the PS3 before he changed his mind. Take it with a grain of salt.
He also had a positive viewpoint on the 360... before also giving it the switcharooni.
I tried the Windows 8 beta. Pretty? Yes. Necessary? For anything that isn't a tablet, no. I hope that they can coincide instead of MS trying to sell nothing but 8 on everything. I wish they would stick with 7 for as long as they did XP, 7 is a great operating system.
All Windows computers being sold will have 8 once it releases. It would be wishful thinking to think otherwise. I also agree that 7 is a great operating system and that there isn't much I want from 8 at the moment. That will change on release if reviews are solid and there are enough little things that I would find useful enough to make the switch.
Guys the point I was simply making was not that I disagree with his statements and you should blindly ignore them, but that I rather take the mindset of just seeing what people have to say without taking a side on it, see how Windows 8 really works once it hits retail, see reviews of the final build that consumers will be using, then make an informed opinion later. Sure Gabe has to have seen the current Windows builds and as a businessman himself he has to know the upcoming platform and make choices early on. However not even he has a golden track-record of being correct 100% and cases where he was correct will never make up for it. Same goes for literally anyone else about anything that isn't finished. Also his calculated guess from his experience and what he's seen so far will always be just a guess, even if he has to make business decisions based on it. If he turns out to be right then fine, but if not then fine as well.
At the very least his attitude on the matter is that he is now interested in making Steam and at least future games work on Linux (Ubuntu at least), which to me is a great move and will make Linux one step closer to being a viable operating system for many gamers and consumers in general (I agree with Gabe that games have become a key factor for OS choice for many consumers). It will also allow Valve to have an open platform to fall back on if his worst-case scenario of Microsoft and Apple closing their platforms even further becomes a reality.
I hope Windows 8 turns out good and Metro isn't a real bother, but I won't really know until it has released and even after that when it is allowed to work and update for a reasonable time after launch (I never expect an OS launch to go smoothly personally). Worst-case scenario for me is that I still work on Windows 7 and that isn't a bad worst-case scenario to have at all.
Log in to comment