On purpose?

Avatar image for rawrnosaurous
Posted by Rawrnosaurous (812 posts) -

Was it a conscious decision by Bungie to not kill off Masterchief at the end of Halo 3 so that 343 could take the reigns and continue using him? Or did 343 just take what they were given and devise a way to make it so that they wouldn't need a new character?

Avatar image for rawrnosaurous
#1 Posted by Rawrnosaurous (812 posts) -

Was it a conscious decision by Bungie to not kill off Masterchief at the end of Halo 3 so that 343 could take the reigns and continue using him? Or did 343 just take what they were given and devise a way to make it so that they wouldn't need a new character?

Avatar image for green_incarnate
#2 Posted by Green_Incarnate (1789 posts) -

Spoilers* 
 
They never killed him off. It was always this way. If you beat it on Legendary you get the extra scene of the chief floating in space. 

Avatar image for thephantomnaut
#3 Posted by ThePhantomnaut (6399 posts) -

The former.

Avatar image for eviltwin
#4 Posted by EvilTwin (3316 posts) -

Bungie probably didn't have any say either way.  It was a conscious decision by Microsoft to not let Bungie kill off Master Chief I'm sure.

Avatar image for ntm
#5 Posted by NTM (9568 posts) -

I'm just happy to continue the Halo franchise with Master Chief and Cortana. 

Avatar image for xdsk
#6 Posted by Xdsk (278 posts) -
@Green_Incarnate said:
Spoilers*  They never killed him off. It was always this way. If you beat it on Legendary you get the extra scene of the chief floating in space. 
This.
Avatar image for surkov
#7 Posted by Surkov (1019 posts) -

When they said "Here's a new xbox trilogy" I was expecting a new IP, but instead we got HALO 4....

Avatar image for craigbo180
#8 Posted by craigbo180 (1763 posts) -
@Rawrnosaurous: I don't know if they necessarily knew they would be handing the reigns over to 343 but I'm sure Microsoft made sure Bungie left it a little open ended so that the franchise could be resumed at a later date by somebody. There was always going to be a Halo 4.
Avatar image for misterchief
#9 Posted by MisterChief (832 posts) -

Even if they did kill him they could have probably bought him back as a Cortana style A.I. or something.

Avatar image for lordxavierbritish
#10 Posted by LordXavierBritish (6651 posts) -

I never understood the appeal of Master Chief as a character.
 
What exactly makes him so special? Could they really not think of anything better to do with the franchise? It's actually a pretty interesting universe.

Avatar image for mr_skeleton
#11 Posted by Mr_Skeleton (5195 posts) -

They weren't going to kill a character that's worth millions of dollars, anyway it was Microsoft's decision not Bungie's.

Avatar image for eidderf
#12 Posted by Eidderf (521 posts) -

I remember hearing when they made reach the original idea (or at least one direction they were thinking about taking) was to continue on from the legendary ending of Halo 3, so I think Bungie had some idea of where they would have taken it if they went down that path so hopefully 343 will develop on that idea whatever that was for 4,

Avatar image for sneterz
#13 Posted by snetErz (132 posts) -

I'd like to see them dig deeper into the Forerunners. Perhaps they still exist out there after all. =O

Avatar image for reygitano
#14 Posted by ReyGitano (2491 posts) -

@snetErz said:

I'd like to see them dig deeper into the Forerunners. Perhaps they still exist out there after all. =O

I'm hoping that's what that huge portal/halo looking thing at the end was.

Avatar image for thephantomnaut
#15 Posted by ThePhantomnaut (6399 posts) -

That's no planet... But really I hope to see what is beyond that opening.

Avatar image for woodenplatypus
#17 Posted by WoodenPlatypus (1389 posts) -

He never died, which people who finished it on Legendary will know. 
Whether it was Bungie's desicion or not is irrelevant really. It's what 343 does with the storyline. 
 
 
It's safe to say Im looking forward to the CE remake more than I am to playing Halo 4.
Avatar image for rawrnosaurous
#18 Posted by Rawrnosaurous (812 posts) -

I know that he didn't die, I just don't know if they let him live because they had a vision of where it would go or if he was alive and 343 needed him because a Halo game not by bungie is a hard enough sell that they needed Masterchief.

Avatar image for joeh
#19 Posted by JoeH (213 posts) -

@CandiBunni: The reason why they keep re using him is cause it's not really a character, he's become a brand now. You see Master Chief you think "Halo". Microsoft aren't gonna just throw away a symbol as recognisable as Master Chief. And really I don't mind them using him again, the Halo games have never really been about compelling characters, more about large scale "plots" with really well engineered action.

Avatar image for pinworm45
#20 Posted by Pinworm45 (4069 posts) -

The real reason he's still a character is because he's not really a character. 
 
Let me explain. Let's say they kill off Master Chief. What kind of character would the next game have? Obviously it'd have to be a strong tough military guy. That's basically all MC is. I'm not saying this as a bad thing, I'm saying it like it is.. Halo isn't exactly a game about depth of Character. Killing off MC would only mean they have to make a new character that's basically identical. This does nothing other than waste time and annoy fans who are into him. 

Avatar image for vaiz
#21 Posted by vaiz (3063 posts) -

With the way they emphasized showing the planet at the end of the Legendary H3 ending, I'm gonna say yeah, this was in the cards.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.