I don't think the infamous games get enough credit.

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for jz
#1 Posted by JZ (2343 posts) -

Those games are fantastic and they are open world games with zero bugs. I wanna say the two infamous games are the most functional games of this generation. They worked from the start how awesome was that?

Avatar image for ll_exile_ll
#2 Edited by ll_Exile_ll (2553 posts) -

While I don't think a game should necessarily be praised for not breaking, I do agree that both inFamous games are excellent, two of my favorite PS3 games.

Avatar image for jz
#3 Posted by JZ (2343 posts) -

Well in a world of a new patch every two weeks for basically every game, one that works out of the box is wonderful.

Avatar image for tarvis
#4 Posted by tarvis (74 posts) -

I did not care for the way the engine pulls you towards objects to grab onto them. Like if you try to simply fall off of a building. And when I began dabbling with the mission creator in the second title, I became only more incensed. That same issue was breaking many of my ideas. Like a bridge that only appeared when you ran over it. The game would straight up have Cole run backwards even though you were pressing forward.

Avatar image for jack268
#5 Posted by Jack268 (3370 posts) -

I think they do.

Avatar image for evilsbane
#6 Edited by Evilsbane (5521 posts) -

They are good, not as good as they could be, I thought two was gonna be like exceptionally great but it was kinda just the first one again.

Also first one had frame rate issues like no ones business they are fun games but hardly perfect.

Avatar image for jz
#7 Posted by JZ (2343 posts) -

Hope they make a third one someday

Avatar image for awesomeusername
#8 Posted by awesomeusername (4600 posts) -

Those are 2 of my favorite games this gen. They're fantastic games and that's true. Besides what one duder above said about the platforming being weird sometimes, the game works great. inFAMOUS 1/2 are perfect superhero/villain games.

Avatar image for phatmac
#9 Posted by Phatmac (5928 posts) -

They're great games. Infamous 2 especially.

Avatar image for stimpack
#10 Posted by Stimpack (1003 posts) -

@Jack268: I also think they do.

Avatar image for awesomeusername
#11 Posted by awesomeusername (4600 posts) -

@JZ: You mean a straight up sequel or a new one, just completely different from Cole's story? Because inFAMOUS 2 ended perfectly and a sequel would kind of kill it.

Avatar image for jz
#12 Posted by JZ (2343 posts) -

I loved the time travel twist of the first game. That was awesome.

Avatar image for jz
#13 Posted by JZ (2343 posts) -

Whatever gets me climbing and shooting lighting again

Avatar image for laszlokovacs
#14 Posted by LaszloKovacs (1272 posts) -

Both were enjoyable, but both also had some pretty serious flaws.

Honestly, if not for the Sucker Punch pedigree, I don't think they would have gotten as much praise or attention as they did.

Avatar image for lydian_sel
#15 Posted by Lydian_Sel (2528 posts) -

InFamous is fun & certainly smoother than the majority of open world games of it's ilk but saying it had zero bugs or problems is a bit much. I've had that game crash on me, I've gotten Cole stuck in the geometry & spaz out, I've seen other enemies go through scripting bugs & likewise get stuck in places, & had save games not recognised or recorded somehow, I've had situations where events don't trigger in story missions forcing me to start them from scratch.

InFamous 2 wasn't the sequel I had hoped for, while it made some improvements to the game as a whole there was a lot of stuff left in there that should have been streamlined in a sequel.

They're commendable for being probably the most stable open world action games of this generation & a lot of fun on top of that.

Avatar image for ramone
#16 Posted by Ramone (3080 posts) -

They were very good games, but I think they do get enough credit for what they were.

Avatar image for wraxend
#17 Edited by Wraxend (615 posts) -

I just wish the powers had got a little bit more insane. I mean Kessler was Cole from the future and could teleport and shit, but Cole's powers never got to that stage. But I did like the inclusion of ice and fire powers.

Avatar image for rentfn
#18 Posted by rentfn (1391 posts) -

I played the first one for a few hours. Couldn't really get into it. I've heard a lot of great things though. Maybe I need to give it another chance. My PS3 gaming has been limited to MLB the show, best baseball game out there and Little Big Planet.

Avatar image for natedawg_kz
#19 Posted by natedawg_kz (265 posts) -

i think nearly all of Sony's exclusives don't get enough credit

Avatar image for mezza
#20 Posted by MezZa (2341 posts) -

I loved them. Two of my favorite ps3 games.

Avatar image for justin258
#21 Posted by Justin258 (13992 posts) -

Can't say that I was compelled to finish them.

Avatar image for likeassur
#22 Edited by LikeaSsur (1748 posts) -

They're definitely far from broken, but what others have said, "Totally functional" is not something I'd put on the back of the box, regardless of the competition.

Avatar image for snail
#23 Posted by Snail (8846 posts) -

They are fucking great. I preferred the first one for some reason. Less emphasis on Karmic decisions was a good thing, for one. Also less weird characters. I didn't really like Nix or Kuo.

The first inFAMOUS is one of my favorite games of this generation.

Avatar image for mosespippy
#24 Posted by mosespippy (4748 posts) -

@JZ: I definitely had some bugs when I played them. When you meet John he's supposed to be under some rubble on a sidewalk or something like that if I remember correctly. I had him spawn underneath the conduit that is supposed to destroy the helicopter and instantly die. Try again, he spawned further back from where he is supposed to be and gets crushed when the helicopter crashes. And there is a mission where you follow Alsen to the trash tower and he didn't appear in the courtyard to trigger the battle with the conduit. In my opinion they are as good as they need to be to not be considered bad. They are good mid tier games. It would have been nice if the second one had any improvements.

@rentfn: I feel like infamous is a slow starter. Once you get to the point where you can grind wires or glide then moving around isn't as much of a chore and suddenly the game is ok.

Avatar image for zombie2011
#25 Posted by zombie2011 (5465 posts) -

I've played a ton of games this gen that haven't been broken.

Infamous is alright but just because it doesn't have a lot of bugs doesn't make it great.

Avatar image for slax
#26 Posted by Slax (1059 posts) -

I didn't really get into the first one that much. Maybe I didn't get far enough, but it didn't grab me like a lot of other open world games have.

Avatar image for legion_
#27 Posted by Legion_ (1718 posts) -

They're infamous. PUN!

Damn, I'm clever.

Avatar image for handlas
#28 Edited by handlas (3139 posts) -

If they would ditch the crappy good/evil aspect that is so pointless then it would be a much better narrative. If I remember correctly, at the end of Infamous 2 is basically gave you a completely contrived option to see the good and evil ending.

The gameplay is top notch tho. I downloaded Festive of Blood but haven't played much of it... need to get back inot that. The transforming into bats to get around teh city faster is a pretty awesome addition. They should just make that some sort of electrical power for him next time.

ahhh remember the days when it was Prototype vs Infamous and majority of people thought Infamous looked like shit and Prototype was more promising.... (For the record, I didn't.)

Avatar image for herbiebug
#29 Posted by HerbieBug (4228 posts) -

I've only played the first and I think it gets too much. Did not enjoy.

Avatar image for theoriginalatlas
#30 Edited by Atlas (2575 posts) -

I thought there was something a little stiff and awkward about the first inFamous game; a lot of the combat missions were clunky. Also, talk about a morality system that they get very little out of. There were great aspects of the game - charging around the city on the railroad tracks was awesome - but it somehow felt like a game that was less than the sum of its parts. Story was pretty cheesy as well.

Sure, it wasn't broken, but inFamous felt too workmanlike, and in some ways that's way worse.

Avatar image for gunstarred
#31 Posted by GunstarRed (6044 posts) -

I think they get plenty. I remember the first being insanely buggy in places. NPC's were always freaking the fuck out.

Avatar image for humanity
#32 Posted by Humanity (15228 posts) -

They are fine games but can get extremely repetitive. I liked the second one better mostly cause of the improvements to how Cole goes about allowing you for faster travel. Towards the end though I was seriously sick of some of those enemies.

Avatar image for theht
#33 Posted by TheHT (14051 posts) -

I had my fair share of bugs in inFamous 2. Also, it got really boring half-way through.

Part 1 is great all around though

Avatar image for darthorange
#34 Posted by DarthOrange (4175 posts) -

Fuck, hearing any criticism for this game at all hurts my heart. I would rather no one talk about it all then to have them speak ill of it. inFamous one was great and inFamous 2 is my favorite game of this generation. I fucking love super heroes, and inFamous 2 fucking nailed it. The combat, the movement, the story, everything was executed beautifully. Playing this game on hard is the best. You will die in a few hits, RPGs and shotguns to the face are almost a guaranteed death and the enemies surround you. And yet you never feel like the fight is unfair. You have more then enough abilities to take them all out as you role around, dodge rockets and deal your brand of electric justice. 

 
I think this game gets enough credit. Could it be bigger? Sure. But I honestly don't care if it isn't a household name like Mario or Angry Birds.
Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
#35 Edited by SethPhotopoulos (5777 posts) -

The one thing I never got over in the first inFamous was the character animations when they talked. It looks a lot like the Sly ones.

Loading Video...

Also I thought the stories in both 1&2 made no fucking sense.

Avatar image for lightningstrike14
#36 Posted by lightningstrike14 (23 posts) -

I think Infamous deserves props for having the stones to not turn itself into a trilogy like every other damn series out there and give itself a proper ending.

Avatar image for quarters
#37 Posted by Quarters (2447 posts) -

I completely agree. I absolutely love both of them, and was surprisingly moved by the ending of the second game(the good ending, in my case). Some of the best open world games around, bar none.

Avatar image for brendan
#38 Posted by Brendan (8914 posts) -

So, how much credit do you think they should have gotten? By how much do you think they don't get enough? Is this just a smokescreen to find people to talk about Infamous with?

Avatar image for procrasturbate
#39 Posted by procrasturbate (297 posts) -

I totally agree. Got $7.00 for it even with the powerup bullshit card at gamestop a while back. Never again i said.

Avatar image for spoonman671
#40 Posted by Spoonman671 (5618 posts) -

The part in the first game where you first get your lightning storm ability was generation-defining for me.

Avatar image for joshthebear
#41 Posted by joshthebear (2704 posts) -

I'm a huge fan of both, but thought the story was much better in 1 than 2; although 2 was a much better playing game.

Avatar image for byterunner
#42 Posted by byterunner (348 posts) -

Those games are some of my favorite games on the PS3.

I never understood why no one ever hyped Sucker Punch. Both Sly Cooper and inFamous were fantastic sereis, but no one seems to care about what they are making. Which is probably gonna be something on the PS4.

Avatar image for hughesman
#43 Posted by hughesman (314 posts) -

I'll take you one further and say that not only are the infamous games underrated, Sucker Punch is one of the best things Sony has going for it. Those Sly games were dope. I can't wait to see what they do next.

Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
#44 Posted by SethPhotopoulos (5777 posts) -

@byterunner said:

Those games are some of my favorite games on the PS3.

I never understood why no one ever hyped Sucker Punch. Both Sly Cooper and inFamous were fantastic sereis, but no one seems to care about what they are making. Which is probably gonna be something on the PS4.

Someone described to me that they were a cheap man's Insomniac. Sucker Punch never seemed to have had a large budget like Insomniac or Naughty dog. They've always had low production values and not a lot of marketing behind them.

Avatar image for a_cute_squirtle
#45 Posted by A_Cute_Squirtle (834 posts) -

I had a terrible time with the first game, so I'm probably in the minority of folks who feel as though they got a little too much credit.

Avatar image for infamousbig
#46 Posted by InfamousBIG (3309 posts) -

Why, thank you.

Avatar image for jeust
#47 Posted by Jeust (11739 posts) -

I think the inFamous franchise gets enough credit, even though I'm a great fan of both games, with the second being one of my favourite games this generation. Everyone knows these games, and every action and superhero games' fans respects and praises them. 

Avatar image for byterunner
#48 Posted by byterunner (348 posts) -

@SethPhotopoulos: Well I'm just gonna say this, I think that Insomniac isn't nearly as good as they once were. At least, they're last few games weren't very interesting. And naughty dog and sucker punch at this point are so different, its hard to compare the two. Certainly, Sucker Punch works in a smaller budget, but say they are a poor mans insomniac/naught dog? I can kinda understand the ND comparison, if thinking of the past in how they're characters were similar, but now SP and ND are so different in what they make, and I just don't think insomniac is that great of company to call SP a poor mans version.

Avatar image for jeanluc
#49 Posted by JeanLuc (3877 posts) -

I thought 1 was given plenty of due, it was 2 I felt ended up being under appreciated. I think the way Sucker Punch ended that game, specifically the good ending, deserves a lot of credit.

Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
#50 Posted by SethPhotopoulos (5777 posts) -

@byterunner said:

@SethPhotopoulos: Well I'm just gonna say this, I think that Insomniac isn't nearly as good as they once were. At least, they're last few games weren't very interesting. And naughty dog and sucker punch at this point are so different, its hard to compare the two. Certainly, Sucker Punch works in a smaller budget, but say they are a poor mans insomniac/naught dog? I can kinda understand the ND comparison, if thinking of the past in how they're characters were similar, but now SP and ND are so different in what they make, and I just don't think insomniac is that great of company to call SP a poor mans version.

I'm not talking about now but back when they were the big 3 Sony platform companies that's what he meant. It was a conversation about Sly Cooper vs. Jak and Ratchet pre-current gen as I probably should have clarified. I'm saying it's a factor into why they didn't really take off the way ND and Insomniac did. They had low production values and nobody was willing to market Sly Cooper the same way that J&D and R&C were marketed.

Take it to next gen, inFamous had to go up against Prototype so any marketing done there was compromised. inFamous also had low production values. inFamous 2 did on a lot of the technical shortcomings of its prequel though. However a lot of people think that inFamous 2 is a lesser game than inFamous. Nobody even knows what Sucker Punch has been doing since Festival of Blood. I assume we'll find out this E3 and it's probably a launch title. Sly 4 is even coming out next month and they aren't developing it. They haven't really done much to stay fresh in people's minds. I'm not saying that they could do that since it might require multiple teams, something I'm not sure they have, but I'm saying this is why they haven't been hyped to the same degree as ND or Insomniac.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.