Just Cause 2 Vehicle Stunts

#1 Posted by Griddler (3374 posts) -

More Just Cause 2? Yes please.

#2 Posted by nanikore (2755 posts) -

Ugh, Swedish accents.
 
Anyway, Square Enix is publishing this now?

#3 Posted by Mysterysheep (402 posts) -

I was sold after playing the first one but this looks ten times more crazy!!

#4 Posted by Griddler (3374 posts) -
@nanikore: Since they took over Eidos and it became Square Enix Europe, yep.
#5 Posted by Ramyun (695 posts) -

Explosions look pretty damn good in this game!!

#6 Posted by Dastan (16 posts) -

Eidos was bought by Square Enix, that's why you say their logo in there. Eidos is still publishing this it's just that Square Enix owns them now (and along with that all their properties, obviously).

#7 Posted by Adziboy (726 posts) -

Looks fun.
#8 Posted by CapnThrash (156 posts) -

AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME!

#9 Posted by Cheetoman (127 posts) -

This game looks really fun. I think I might pick this one up just for some cool multiplayer moments.

#10 Posted by AURON570 (1775 posts) -

"We wanted it to be crazy, over-the-top" YES! I am glad they didn't make it realistic.

#11 Posted by JoelTGM (5783 posts) -

awesome

#12 Posted by caseylakes (301 posts) -

SO, SO GOOD.

#13 Posted by Rebirth1337 (849 posts) -

Wow this actually looks really good.

#14 Posted by Terry_Bogard (308 posts) -

This looks awesome. 

#15 Posted by Death_Burnout (3837 posts) -

Loving the improved car damage.
 
Just Cause mother scratchers...Just Cause

#16 Posted by MrMiyagi (947 posts) -

SO AWESOME.

#17 Posted by lucas_kelly (780 posts) -

I didn't expect it to look that good.

#18 Posted by HT101 (1264 posts) -

This game looks super duper freaking crazy.  In a really, really good way obviously.

#19 Posted by Anthony_Galindo (93 posts) -

Yes! He said it was stupid, in a good way, I love that.

#20 Posted by AjayRaz (12677 posts) -

oh my... NEED NOW!! 

#21 Posted by RiddleBrother (521 posts) -

This game continues to look fucking awesome.

#22 Posted by BD_Mr_Bubbles (1834 posts) -
@Rebirth1337 said:
"Wow this actually looks really good. "
#23 Posted by JackSukeru (6142 posts) -
@nanikore said:
" Ugh, Swedish accents. "
I hear ya buddy :/ 
 
 
This game looks really, really good. So good in fact that I'm getting suspicious of the game footage, is it from the PC version? How will the PS3 version look and play? 
 
In either case, draw distance to me is the most important improvement we can get in graphics, I love it when you can look out over a huge world and go anywhere that you can see.
#24 Posted by EdTwo (481 posts) -

i love that the guy called his game stupid. i really want this

#25 Edited by MrKlorox (11142 posts) -

If there's one thing I hated about the first game was the way the vehicles felt. It seemed like it was arcadey to the extent that it seemed like it was using it's arcadism as an excuse for controlling ridiculously.
 
But it is one of the few games I have actually finished... but I tend to think It's because I had nothing else to play.   
 
I wish they'd approach it from a more realistic ridiculousness this time around (no matter how oxymoronic that sounds). You can do as much crazy shit as you want as long as it looks and feels right. For example driving should never ever get less sim/realistic than the 3D GTAs before GTA4. And the crazy wild action in Prototype felt 'plausible' in the "if this was going to happen, then this is how it would be" sense. I never got that from the first Just Cause.
 
Having said that, the sliding/inertia of the vehicles looks promising.

#26 Posted by bluemantra (85 posts) -

Man I hope this turns out to be as fun as this games look. 

#27 Posted by SleepyDoughnut (1270 posts) -

There's a desert and snow mountain on the same island?

#28 Posted by swamplord666 (1816 posts) -

i'm only now fully embrassing the name of the game "why can you hookshot between planes? just cause..."

#29 Posted by canucks23 (1080 posts) -

Seems like a great game, but it looks like it might have to much to do to have a decent control scheme.

#30 Posted by DanielJW (4929 posts) -

This seems like it will be very close to playing Die Hard in video game form.

#31 Posted by Set (157 posts) -

it's so weird to see "square enix" at the beginning

#32 Posted by monster9999 (420 posts) -

duude yes...YES

#33 Posted by Milkman (17996 posts) -

Hm..I'm surprised that Square Enix is keeping Eidos' name on this game. 

#34 Posted by RandomInternetUser (6805 posts) -
@canucks23: That is the one thing I'm worried about, it looks so fun, but it seems like mapping all the shit you can do to the controller and making it a very good control scheme will be a very tough task.  I really hope they pull it off though, this looks so fun.
#35 Edited by Jayzilla (2644 posts) -

creepy developer intros lolz.
**EDIT** "If you are driving across the desert, you want an off-road vehicle."

#36 Posted by WreckinRodRumbler (125 posts) -

YOU MEAN, IF I SHOOT THEIR WHEELS.. THEY ACTUALLY SWERVE AND TUMBLE AROUND BEFORE EXPLODING?!
 
Good god.

#37 Posted by FunExplosions (5535 posts) -

3:05
 
Been dreaming of this moment in gaming.

#38 Posted by BraveFart (312 posts) -
@nanikore said:

" Ugh, Swedish accents. Anyway, Square Enix is publishing this now? "

 They made this (probably) amazing actiongame and all you do is..... complain about the guys accent who made the game. god that's unthankful.
 
it just shows how picky some people are. not even the game has to be flawless... even the developers accents has to be flawless. lol
#39 Posted by Capt_Ventris (634 posts) -

"Laws of phsyics on drugs" Thats a quote for the box that is

#40 Posted by EspadaKiller (11 posts) -

It really looks good! SO getting it :O

#41 Posted by mrsmiley (1253 posts) -

holy shite. i'm getting it.

#42 Posted by TheIneffableBob (254 posts) -

Damn, son. This game reminds me of

#43 Posted by ArcLyte (912 posts) -

woah, day 1 buy

#44 Posted by HatKing (6512 posts) -

Okay... I want this.
#45 Posted by Depth (359 posts) -

Getting this day 1.

#46 Posted by Sly_Ry (155 posts) -

I want to blow up that passenger airliner.
#47 Edited by dietmango (1704 posts) -

It's really weird seeing Square Enix's name on there.
 
Great looking game, actually.

#48 Posted by day2daze (181 posts) -
@Jayzilla said:
" creepy developer intros lolz. **EDIT** "If you are driving across the desert, you want an off-road vehicle." "
yeah this isn't the first video they've used them for and before you and me would be like-minded, i mean these guys aren't movie Gods wats up wit dat?
but now, hell gives these fools props they deserve some screen time.  Absolutely bonkers.
#49 Posted by day2daze (181 posts) -
@Jayzilla said:
" creepy developer intros lolz. **EDIT** "If you are driving across the desert, you want an off-road vehicle." "
yeah this isn't the first video they've used them for and before you and me would be like-minded, i mean these guys aren't movie Gods wats up wit dat?
but now, hell gives these fools props they deserve some screen time.  Absolutely bonkers.
#50 Posted by Benjaminvdv (320 posts) -

Looks good. The first one felt like everything was the same after a while, because even though you were on a different part, it all still looked the same. Looks like they brought in a lot more variety, that plus other new stuff. I will be looking forward to this game!

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.