Should this worthless game be banned from Giant Bomb?

Post by get2sammyb (4,189 posts) See mini bio

46 ACH / 725 P

Loading...

Yup without Kane & Lynch there would be no GiantBomb. And that's just wrong.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by brukaoru (3,300 posts) See mini bio

341 ACH / 4948 P

Loading...

I don't think it should be banned at all. There are plenty of bad games in the world and without evidence of how bad they were, people will forget about them. Bad games have their place, they need to be remembered so others can learn from them. And I know there are other sites that have stored information about bad games, but I think GiantBomb's database should consider every game, good or bad.

And the whole Gerstmann incident has little to do with the game itself, it was the way the higher-ups at the company treated the situation... Besides, it wasn't just this one game that caused that whole ruckus.

Edited 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by TheGTAvaccine (2,184 posts) See mini bio

2799 ACH / 48335 P

Loading...

It's a fun game.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by Trnck (93 posts) See mini bio

357 ACH / 0 P

Loading...

I actually searched for these posts.
No please, let people know how crappy this game is.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by Vaxadrin (1,788 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

Dwreck said:

"Don't hate the game. Hate Eidos and Cnet.
"

Exactly. It's a bit unfair to the developers to punish them. All they did was a make a product.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by Jensonb (749 posts) See mini bio

467 ACH / 8655 P

Loading...

That's just stupid. Giant Bomb is the fountain of gaming knowledge, we can't ban a game just because we don't like it.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by chronicsmoke (504 posts) See mini bio

990 ACH / 17820 P

Loading...

no

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by pause422 (4,100 posts) See mini bio

956 ACH / 16915 P

Loading...

No game shouldn't be included regardless of reasons...but the game is terrible, and its amazing they're making a movie out of it. This time instead of making a movie out of a decent game, they're making one out of a shitty game so...can only imagine how that turns out.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by MisoRonery (233 posts) See mini bio

118 ACH / 1205 P

Loading...

As much as I love Turbo Man and his burger adventures, I'll have to disagree.

The game was pretty crappy, but even crappy games should be in the ultimate video game database of the universe.

On the topic of the movie, the premise was the least crappy part of the game, and I'll like anything that Bruce Willis passes gas near, so count me in.

Posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Post by Vod_Crack (102 posts) See mini bio

2428 ACH / 47388 P

Loading...

Poor Io Interactive caught in between that mess

Posted 1 year, 2 months ago

Post by Woodtsunami (85 posts) See mini bio

378 ACH / 4185 P

Loading...

keep the game but always have a forum in tribute to it's effect on GB and the most hated GS.

Posted 1 year ago

Post by t67443 (33 posts) See mini bio

1338 ACH / 24085 P

Loading...

I think the game was good and had fun multiplayer. Sucks what happened to it though.

Posted 1 year ago

Post by Bulldog19892 (1,241 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

suneku said:

"it's getting a movie which is bound to be crappy... even though Bruce Willis is in it.
"

Woah, woah, woah. They're making a movie out of a game where the major complaint was the shitty characters and storyline? Seriously? It would be like making a movie out of Twilight.... wait, shit.

Posted 1 year ago

Post by SmugDarkLoser (4,044 posts) See mini bio

1600 ACH / 35152 P

Loading...

Kayne and Lynch is the reason for this site, so no, it should be displayed with... well, I dunno.

But Kayne and Lynch is a pretty good game. Nothing special, but not bad by any means

Posted 1 year ago

Post by daniel_beck_90 (2,289 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

I actually liked Kane and lynch , I also can not wait for Hitman 5 . I like IO interactive 's style , though I hate Eidos for its policies

Posted 1 year ago

Post by BiggerBomb (5,747 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

It's the reason for GiantBomb, it is the opposite of worthless. It's priceless!

Posted 1 year ago

Post by HandsomeDead (5,274 posts) See mini bio

1424 ACH / 27465 P

Loading...

Seeing as it stars Michael Ironside and Kiefer Sutherland, this game is far from worthless. Bad, yes, worthless, no.

Posted 1 year ago

Post by Gameboi (459 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

Considering that it played a big part in creating the firestorm that led to the development of Giant Bomb in the first place, I'd think you guys would want to put it up on a pedestal, if for no other reason than that alone.

Edited 1 year ago

Post by Bucketdeth (4,644 posts) See mini bio

427 ACH / 5145 P

Loading...

Online Now

I think we should just leave this game alone, it make suck balls but it`s still a game, Jeff is over it, why can`t we be.

Posted 1 year ago

Post by AuthenticM (418 posts) See mini bio

845 ACH / 13120 P

Loading...

Dead_Pixel said:

"Without this game we may not have Giant Bomb.........we should honour the game.
"

+1

Posted 1 year ago

Post by super_machine (956 posts) See mini bio

383 ACH / 4950 P

Loading...

No, every game needs fair coverage Good or bad. Besides, without this game GiantBomb might not have existed! Its the butterfly effect.

Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by bjorno (609 posts) See mini bio

1511 ACH / 37079 P

Loading...

It was pretty decent, I'd give it a 6/10.

Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Pibo47 (1,739 posts) See mini bio

3116 ACH / 62710 P

Loading...

ban fuck no fuck. The fuck game fuck has fuck good fuck MP fuck. This fuck game fuck has fuck no fuck affect fuck on fuck me fuck. (who ever gets the joke gets a HUGE cookie)

Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Arsenal86 (66 posts) See mini bio

534 ACH / 11604 P

Loading...

No, the game should not be banned as It was eidos who got Jeff sacked as they force CNET to sack him as gave the game a bad review

Edited 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Hexpane (1,111 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

I vote ban it, just for spite

Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Paul (224 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

Pibo47 said:

"ban fuck no fuck. The fuck game fuck has fuck good fuck MP fuck. This fuck game fuck has fuck no fuck affect fuck on fuck me fuck. (who ever gets the joke gets a HUGE cookie)"

Oh ho ho, very clever.

Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Rapture (182 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

no

Posted 11 months ago

Post by marc (159 posts) See mini bio

51 ACH / 520 P

Loading...

I think it has good potential as a movie. Hell, it had good potential as a game to, it just didn't turn out to be all that good. The idea behind it is awesome though.

Posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Manhattan_Project (123 posts) See mini bio

Loading...

@marc: Why. WHY. WWWHHHHYYYYY!!!!!!

Posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Post by Muttinus_Rump (318 posts) See mini bio

198 ACH / 2585 P

Loading...

@get2sammyb said:

" Yup without Kane & Lynch there would be no GiantBomb. And that's just wrong. "

This. Banning Kane & Lynch could cause some kind of paradox in which Giant Bomb and all its users are sucked into a black hole and vanish from existence forever... but you know, might not happen.

Posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men Forum

Should this worthless game be banned from Giant Bomb?