Hail on everyone, this game sucks, end of story, why?

1- Typical Gameplay, Find a barricade, Crouch, Aim gun's sight, fire- enjoy the blood flashing from of enemy soldiers. What's the point?
2- Non-Innovative Atmosphere: Same environment that most of games in today have- A ruined city, an abandoned county warehouse- why is it so exciting?
3- WHY should a team follow you all the time?

I see you have the same absolutism as your avatar.
It's a shame you didn't give it more time, I for one enjoy it quite alot.

"Hail on everyone, this game sucks, end of story, why?

1- Typical Gameplay, Find a barricade, Crouch, Aim gun's sight, fire- enjoy the blood flashing from of enemy soldiers. What's the point?

2- Non-Innovative Atmosphere: Same environment that most of games in today have- A ruined city, an abandoned county warehouse- why is it so exciting?

3- WHY should a team follow you all the time?

Why are you 15?

"Why are you 15?
"

For me it is like an improved version of Halo 3.

Halo 3 sucks, this one sucks less which means it is actually pretty good.

"Hail on everyone, this game sucks, end of story, why?

1- Typical Gameplay, Find a barricade, Crouch, Aim gun's sight, fire- enjoy the blood flashing from of enemy soldiers. What's the point?
2- Non-Innovative Atmosphere: Same environment that most of games in today have- A ruined city, an abandoned county warehouse- why is it so exciting?
3- WHY should a team follow you all the time?


"

Why does everything have to be new and 'innovative' these days. The problem isn't that you've seen the environments before, it's that they haven't been done well by the developers.

"Aurelito said:

"Hail on everyone, this game sucks, end of story, why?

1- Typical Gameplay, Find a barricade, Crouch, Aim gun's sight, fire- enjoy the blood flashing from of enemy soldiers. What's the point?

You just summed up most of the FPS genre.
Aurelito said:

2- Non-Innovative Atmosphere: Same environment that most of games in today have- A ruined city, an abandoned county warehouse- why is it so exciting?

Agreed. The atmosphere and environments look awful.
Aurelito said:

3- WHY should a team follow you all the time?

Because it's a design choice? A bit like the squad from Republic Commando, that game would have sucked without your squad.

"

1.  Yeah afterall the game should be 99.9% platforming rofl

2.  Yeah your totally right.  The game should take place in suburbia lol.

3.  Yeah after all everyone in the military goes One man Army on the enemy, and runs and the enemy like Rambo. 

Seriously though.  Your complaints are stupid.  Mostly every reviewer has praised this game.  Also about not being innovative.  I think its a good thing its not innovative.  I rather have a game that tries and perfects the genre then a game that tries a gimmick. 

"1.  Yeah afterall the game should be 99.9% platforming rofl

2.  Yeah your totally right.  The game should take place in suburbia lol.

3.  Yeah after all everyone in the military goes One man Army on the enemy, and runs and the enemy like Rambo. 

Seriously though.  Your complaints are stupid.  Mostly every reviewer has praised this game.  Also about not being innovative.  I think its a good thing its not innovative.  I rather have a game that tries and perfects the genre then a game that tries a gimmick. 


"

Well I'll play it more in the next few days until I really get disappointed from an overhyped game, (I'm playing the full version- not demo).

then I will check here for an update. I'm not a freaking fanboy nerd I'm just totally disappointed from industry- Like everyone else does these days.

Shadow2K6 said:

"1.  Yeah afterall the game should be 99.9% platforming rofl

2.  Yeah your totally right.  The game should take place in suburbia lol.

3.  Yeah after all everyone in the military goes One man Army on the enemy, and runs and the enemy like Rambo. 

Seriously though.  Your complaints are stupid.  Mostly every reviewer has praised this game.  Also about not being innovative.  I think its a good thing its not innovative.  I rather have a game that tries and perfects the genre then a game that tries a gimmick. 


"

"For me it is like an improved version of Halo 3.

Halo 3 sucks, this one sucks less which means it is actually pretty good.
"

"Well I'll play it more in the next few days until I really get disappointed from an overhyped game, (I'm playing the full version- not demo).

then I will check here for an update. I'm not a freaking fanboy nerd I'm just totally disappointed from industry- Like everyone else does these days.

Shadow2K6 said:

"1.  Yeah afterall the game should be 99.9% platforming rofl

2.  Yeah your totally right.  The game should take place in suburbia lol.

3.  Yeah after all everyone in the military goes One man Army on the enemy, and runs and the enemy like Rambo. 

Seriously though.  Your complaints are stupid.  Mostly every reviewer has praised this game.  Also about not being innovative.  I think its a good thing its not innovative.  I rather have a game that tries and perfects the genre then a game that tries a gimmick. 


"

It's not even prefect- It's just a little bit-very little bit better than F.E.A.R.: Project Origin- most horrible sequel of this generation. (I mentioned Fear 2 because they're almost released at a same time despite being thematically similar)


"

This thread gives me hope that one day we will find a user almost as retarded as levios - that day is coming my friends

I haven't played the game so I can't comment but I feel like it's your own fault if you allowed yourself to set standards for a video game that it could never meet. I'm excited, and have initiated a lot of excitement for Killzone 2, but, at the end of the day I'm looking forward to a polished, great looking video game. Having played the demo, I think it will be that, I can't confirm it is until I've played the whole thing, but I have every confidence in the majority of the press and other members on here and around the Net who are enjoying the final version.

To say you played it for 3 minutes and were bored with it is kinda dumb -- you should probably nitpick after you've finished the game, particularly on things like environments. You never know what the game will throw at you later on.

Oh - and innovation is lovely from time to time but not always. Sometimes it's nice to see old concepts being improved (*cough* Dead Space, *cough* Super Mario Galaxy, etc). While I understand the FPS genre is very crowded, and many, like myself, are totally burned out on it -- I for one am excited about yet another FPS, because, well by all accounts this is a very good one.

"Aurelito said:

"Well I'll play it more in the next few days until I really get disappointed from an overhyped game, (I'm playing the full version- not demo).

then I will check here for an update. I'm not a freaking fanboy nerd I'm just totally disappointed from industry- Like everyone else does these days.

Shadow2K6 said:

"1.  Yeah afterall the game should be 99.9% platforming rofl

2.  Yeah your totally right.  The game should take place in suburbia lol.

3.  Yeah after all everyone in the military goes One man Army on the enemy, and runs and the enemy like Rambo. 

Seriously though.  Your complaints are stupid.  Mostly every reviewer has praised this game.  Also about not being innovative.  I think its a good thing its not innovative.  I rather have a game that tries and perfects the genre then a game that tries a gimmick. 


"

It's not even prefect- It's just a little bit-very little bit better than F.E.A.R.: Project Origin- most horrible sequel of this generation. (I mentioned Fear 2 because they're almost released at a same time despite being thematically similar)


"

Christ man, what the hell ARE your standards?!
"

"Snail said:

"For me it is like an improved version of Halo 3.

Halo 3 sucks, this one sucks less which means it is actually pretty good."

retarded post of the day confirmed"

" For FPS genre- a game like Half-Life. with a non complex and totally reduced story- Without  guys and chicks speaking over the radio or tailing on your ass- Innovative weapons, bright environment- what else should I say? Or at leas- if it's going to be a  team work game It should be like the original Call of Duty. if you've got my point, you won't disturb me for hating this game. I neither trolling or saying something irrational. It's a typical mediocre game. PS3 fanboys gonna like you're a kid or a fanboy when the game wasn't still out- now it's out. now what? I'm an ignorant kid or just a dumb bastard trying to show himself off?
"

To satisfy you, if an FPS has to be like Half Life, and thats when you will play it, prepare to have loads of free time. Those games come once every 5-10 years... and even thats iffy. Killzone 2 never aspired to be revolutionize the genre... it did attempt to define it. IMO its been quite successful in achieving the goals it set out to accomplish.

"This thread gives me hope that one day we will find a user almost as retarded as levios - that day is coming my friends"

I kinda agree with # 2. And i also kinda agree with #3. Its really more of a i see both sides thing. I have been very surprised by this game...and dissopointed by R2...so i am looking forward to this game.

No, it doesn't do anything innovative, but it does something good.

I hate when everyone says "it doesnt do anything new"...
Strip most new games down and you will see it doesnt do anything new. Especially FPS'. Just because you dont like the FPS gameplay doesnt mean that others dont. I like the objective based stuff.
My only wish on KZ2 is that i hoped there was more cutscenes in between levels.