I didnt realise it was gonna feel so 'gamey'. For all the immersion and attention to detail creating a believable world you can interact with, I really fucking HATE the stupid interrogations, whereby if multiple pieces of evidence can hint at fowl play, only ONE will do the job, and if you dont get it right, all you get is a blanket refute statement from your witness that doesnt even relate to what the evidence is!! Even if what you're trying to present isn't the most vital piece necassary, I think Phelps should still talk about it in relation to the case, instead of the game being 'nope sorry' and cutting that whole dialogue option out the scene. 
It just really bugs me how you end up with a ton of evidence for each case, but theres no fun in talking through it all with your suspects.
Btw I'm just on the white shoe murder on the 3rd desk , so no spoilers for after this please!!
What you guys think?

I don't mind it.

While I agree that the interrogations are pretty cut and dry, the technology behind the facial animations is so expensive and time consuming that recording dialog for every possible piece of evidence wouldn't be feasible. Anyway, when you're done with the Homicide desk, check out my blog post where some discussion about the lesser points of the game is going on. That blog has spoilers through homicide, so be warned.

I finished it about an hour ago, and I absolutely loved the game. The ending was kind of disappointing, and it was a bit repetitive but overall I enjoyed the game quite a lot.

There's definitely some kinks that need ironing out.

It's not a perfect game, but it's still the best thing I've played this year. Loved it.

I just got to Arson, so I am judging without finishing the game, but.........I really think that once the "new technology" sheen wears off, there is a well made but repetitive and very linear game. 

In before the in b4 "is it just me" image spam

  if multiple pieces of evidence can hint at fowl play, only ONE will do the job?

There were definitely times were I felt like I had evidence to nail the guy to the wall, but it didn't do anything. 

I agree that the interrogation system was definitely the biggest bummer of L.A. Noire, it could have been handled much better. However, there were actually a few occasions where multiple pieces of evidence would work for a single answer. There's even one where pressing Doubt or Lie would net you a correct answer.   

I've run into this problem, and yes,it got frustrating.

The truth/doubt system seems completely arbitrary almost half the time to me.  I really don't like interrogations as a main game mechanic. 

ARGH!!! I'm sick of this, especially later on when you have multiple pieces of evidence that implicate the same thing, picking the wrong one ends the entire conversation!! Its a joke, and utterly unrealistic!! :(

At least the game lets you continue if you mess up, and the only thing you can really screw up is your rank. (Unless you completely botch an interrogation)

 fowl play

I agree to the point that I"ve had a few question sequences now where even with the incredible facial expressions and dialogue, your still kinda left up to guessing what piece of evidence Team Bondi wants you to use, or there have been other times when I find out after replaying the mission several times in a row that Bondi wanted you to travel and talk to someone else first, because that would be the only way to collect the evidence needed to properly interigate another suspect...

How many topics does it take to remind everyone there is a difference between suggestive evidence and solid evidence?