Can Rockstar or Team Bondi's survivors tell?

Thanks, great game!

It's an adventure game. I don't think it needs any sort of multiplayer.

I'm surprised they even got the game out.

was it supposed to have coop or are you asking for it?

One guy can carefully unfold the note, and the other can carefully fold it back up. Cut investigation time in half.

I wish it did have co-op, could have got a friend to play the bulk of this shitty game for me...

Wouldnt be very fun following your partner around asking questions waiting, there isnt all that much actual action, i gusse they could have made some sort of free roaming co op missions to go along with it, altho that may or may not have just detracted from what the goal of the game was. Idk what aspect of the game i hounestly would have wanted Co-op in.

Yeah, there could be a voting system, if you both vote doubt he'll doubt, if you can't agree then you fail the case.

@mscupcakes said:

Yeah, there could be a voting system, if you both vote doubt he'll doubt, if you can't agree then you fail the case.

@Sooty said:

I wish it did have co-op, could have got a friend to play the bulk of this shitty game for me...

you both know that you can do all that ...you know ... in real life? asking people with words and stuff?

@Emilio said:

Can Rockstar or Team Bondi's survivors tell?

Thanks, great game!

what on earth would you do with co-op on this game?!

I don't think the game needs co-op. As a game that leans heavily on the character development of Phelps, a second character could negatively impact that progression. Plus the games mechanics are built for a solo experience.

one guy can be the good cop and one can be the bad cop 
good cop gets truth, doubt, lie 
bad cop gets truth intimidate, threaten

@DeF: ah yes, but you can't enjoy Jolly Cooperation online.

I can't help but think that it would be the dullest co-op game in quite a long time.

This game doesn't need co-op, it needs competitive multiplayer.

@DeF said:

@mscupcakes said:

Yeah, there could be a voting system, if you both vote doubt he'll doubt, if you can't agree then you fail the case.

@Sooty said:

I wish it did have co-op, could have got a friend to play the bulk of this shitty game for me...

you both know that you can do all that ...you know ... in real life? asking people with words and stuff?

After having played the game I don't know if I could make somebody do it actually. It was painful enough for me getting through that game, its charm wore off after the first 3 hours.

Good-cop, cop-who-gets-really-bored-and-starts-shooting-people-in-the-face.

Meh, I don't think the game needs co-op. It's better that it remained a solo experience so you could take it in at your own pace.

Your sense: Where is it?

@mandude said:

Good-cop, cop-who-gets-really-bored-and-starts-shooting-people-in-the-face.

I wish but in LA Noire it would be more like: Good-cop, good-cop-who-can't-do-anything-besides-standing-next-to-other-cop.

What? Why?

My mistake. It's the part of the job. You understand.

@Sooty said:

After having played the game I don't know if I could make somebody do it actually. It was painful enough for me getting through that game, its charm wore off after the first 3 hours.

If after 3 hours you saw that you didn't like the game, why did you keep playing?

Just do what I did. My girlfriend was watching and we were deciding what choices to pick in each investigation.

Nah, that wouldn't really work.

Beat the homicide desk without using low kick.

No. It needs a fedora editor.