mesoian's Lost Planet 2 (Xbox 360) review

A problematic situation

I have to say, this past tuesday was a bit of an up and down day for me. Upon checking my email, I noticed that my copy of Lost Planet 2 had arrived and was waiting on my door stop, which made me very happy. However, reviews were coming out, and were quite low. I bit my lower lip in order to quell the quivering caused by Arthur Geise's IGN review of a 6 out of 10. Having played a rather large amount of LP1, I really wanted to go into this game with high hopes. Capcom's combination of a slower paced 3rd person shooter with a vertical element really rubbed me the right way when it was released almost 3 and a half years ago. But now doubt was creeping in. I was worried that I may have purchased a lemon. 
So upon getting home, I collected my package, shut down my laptop, ripped the game packaging open and slipped in the disc. The first place I went was the placed that most people's ire seemed to be directed at; The online lobbies and the multiplayer co-op. But as the server select screen arose, I was delighted. Dozens upon dozens of open games, all in "standing by" status, Most of them with 3 people simply looking for a fourth. This is what I was hoping for! Ease and accessability in the online experience! So, I chose a lobby, 3 people already waiting as I put in my headset. Everyone was very nice and cordial (shocker being live and all). And soon we were in the middle of the opening movie, late title screen and all. 
And it was a blast. From the get go, people are piloting VSs, giant alien bug monsters are popping out of the ground, akrid are flying everywhere filling screens, prize boxes are falling all around us, it was everything I had come to expect from the Lost Planet Pedegree. I, with these 3 others, contined to play through 1-2, where the host had to leave.
And here is the first problem with the online experience, no host swapping. IF the host has to go, the game is over. But, that's not a huge deal right: Host swapping is a fairly new concept, especially for live, and dedicated servers are no where to be seen. So we can certainly roll with the punches. Which is where the second problem came in. Upon returning to the server select screen, I now saw the exactp opposite. Dozens and dozens of games lined up, all listed down as "Playing". Why? Even if I joined these games, I wouldn't be able to enter until a checkpoint was reached. Why couldn't I simply sort by "Standing By" lobbies? So I pressed x to refresh the screen, and pressed it again, and again. AND AGAIN. A good two dozen times resulted in nothing but "playing" lobbies. That niggling doubt began to creep back in. 
So, I thought to myself, "Self, why don't you let the people come to you?". A great idea. I backed out to the campaign main menu and hosted a game. And waited. And waited. And waited, and waited, and waited. I turned my laptop back on and continued to wait. And continued, and continued....Eventually I started a running tally. I took 16 minutes for 1 person to join my lobby, and another 12 for us to get 4 people. That's 28 minutes of waiting to play. And that's terrible. 
And it was here that I understood why people were scoring this game low. Out of the 2 hours I had attempted to play the game, I had only been able to actually PLAY for about 35 minutes. And I placed my controller down, and sighed, and went to get a beer. I had to agree with the majority of reviewers. The online system is borked, and because the rest of the game depended so heavily upon it, it intrinsically suffers. 
But my friends, my friends...there is a silver lining to this game. When you can get into a game, If you can find a party that will stick with you to the end, when you feel as if you are actually playing the game and not trying to get into a single session, it was AMAZINGLY FUN. Last night, I spent about 3 hours working with 3 other xbox live players, the lot of us trying to get through world 2 on hard mode. We kept getting to the train yard and getting eviserated by the waves and waves of enemies constant rushing us. But we were laughing and yelling and hooting and hollering, barking commands, throwing down assists, relaying strategies, having a great time. Due to LP2's unforgiving save system, everytime we died, we had to return to the beginning of the mission, but we didn't care. We were having such a good time, working out each combat puzzle, getting through the previous areas in fractions of the time it took us when we first arrived, we only wanted to continue. That is the magic of LP2, even though it is clunky and non-intrusive and difficult to manage, it is fun. Shooting down Akrid, trying to take down enormous bosses, infiltrating rival bases, pulling off insane escapes, it was wonderful. 
So friends, my friends, is this game perfect? No. It is fundimentally flawed in such a way that makes one question the validity of a japanese developers online worth. Archaic, pedantic issues that make things difficult and frustrating. But much like a pineapple, if you can cut through all that mess, there is a wonderful game waiting underneath. So please, have patience, give it a try. Goozex it if you don't want to spend money. But there is a wonderful game here. Something of great worth. For me it was worth 60 dollars, hands down. The meta critic score is low, most reviewers are down on it, but take my advice friends, try this. Because it's real real real good, if you can dig deep enough.
Also - Mexican Space Banditos, COME ON!!! HOW CAN YOU NOT LOVE THIS?!?

Posted by l4wd0g

Did you try creating a game? I've found that you will have people joining your game within two minutes.
Posted by Mesoian
@l4wd0g:  I did, yes. As I stated in my review, that initial point did take an exceedingly long time for a full game to begin. And while waiting 28 minutes may not be the concrete amount of time, the mean wait does still sit somewhere between 10 and 20 minutes for a game to start, which is inexcusable. The server sorting system paired with the poor filtering really does make starting games or joining games too difficult, more so if you're looking to start from a specific spot.

Other reviews for Lost Planet 2 (Xbox 360)

    Lost Planet 2: Some Things Are Better Not Found 0

            When the original Lost Planet released on the Xbox 360 as an exclusive, it stood out as a third-person shooter and was subsequently hailed as a relative success. Granted, this was during a period in the 360 lifespan when the console still wasn’t being bombarded on a weekly basis by waves of new titles, downloadable or otherwise. The storyline and mechanics of that first game are still capable of standing on their own, even amongst more modern competitors. The same however, may not hold t...

    1 out of 1 found this review helpful.

    A very fun game despite alot of its odd design 0

    Lost Planet 2 is an interesting insight in to the state of the Japanese gaming industry, one that is struggling to remain relevant in a world where 90% of the "big games" are made in western countries.  Capcom is one of the few Japanese developers that whole heartedly embraced this simple fact; that if you want to sell your game in the current industry you need to appeal globally. Between Devil May Cry 4's more approachable combat, Resident Evil 5s heavy shooter emphasis and Lost Planet 2 trying...

    7 out of 10 found this review helpful.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.