Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Mass Effect 3

    Game » consists of 19 releases. Released Mar 06, 2012

    When Earth begins to fall in an ancient cycle of destruction, Commander Shepard must unite the forces of the galaxy to stop the Reapers in the final chapter of the original Mass Effect trilogy.

    I have spent a disgusting amount of money on ME3 multiplayer

    • 64 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for cornishrocker
    CornishRocker

    405

    Forum Posts

    8

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 13

    #51  Edited By CornishRocker

    Slot machine micro transactions are the worst! You don't even know what you're paying for!

    Avatar image for wickedcobra03
    WickedCobra03

    2375

    Forum Posts

    587

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 8

    #52  Edited By WickedCobra03

    @Akyho said:

    @SpaceInsomniac said:

    Money? As in REAL money?

    Yes and this duder has a problem. A problem EA loves and hoped would happen.

    I am not playing my multiplayer in Mass Effect 3 just because I don't want to give EA those stats that I played their multiplayer. I will not give them the satisfaction. And hell if I am going to spend money on their games.... especially kind of mad about that Jarvik thing. Hey, guess what Bioware, instead of making multiplayer, ummmm, should have spent those resources on making a good ending. kthx.

    Avatar image for morningstar
    morningstar

    2548

    Forum Posts

    351

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #53  Edited By morningstar

    Triple digit? my condolensces.

    Avatar image for def
    DeF

    5450

    Forum Posts

    208181

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #54  Edited By DeF

    Oh my god, why are you doing this? TRIPLE digits? As in "more than 100 bucks???" Are you insane?? There is TONS of better stuff you can do with your money while having the same amount of fun with that game.

    Seriously, check yo'self before your wriggedi-wreck yo'self!

    Avatar image for grixxel
    Grixxel

    921

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #55  Edited By Grixxel

    Wow. Just ... wow.

    Avatar image for paulunga
    paulunga

    3517

    Forum Posts

    176

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #56  Edited By paulunga

    @Tennmuerti: Uh, you can get Gold items on Veteran, only the N7 ones are exclusive to Spectre packs and pretty rare at that.

    Avatar image for lolwot
    lolwot

    409

    Forum Posts

    46909

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #57  Edited By lolwot

    deleted

    Avatar image for smashedcontrollers
    SmasheControllers

    2951

    Forum Posts

    25972

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 6

    @normalpants: Your not alone, we are why they can get away with this stuff.

    Avatar image for mideonnviscera
    MideonNViscera

    2269

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #59  Edited By MideonNViscera

    @Jace said:

    But...even the most expensive pack only takes 2-3 games to unlock. Why would you do that? Shit. He's going to be a statistic in a marketing conference where they can point and say, "See, gamers love to spend money on RANDOM GAME ITEMS THAT EQUATE TO AN HOUR OF PLAY."

    This is why I cringe when Jeff encourages people to vote with their wallet. His reasoning is completely valid, but a sucker is born every minute. If suckers have enough buying power, they can really fuck the rest of us over.

    So instead of saying, "Vote with your wallet. If you like spending money on random easily-attainable items, please continue to do so." I'm going to say, "Stop it."

    So you're pissed about what someone else does with their money. Great perspective there.

    Avatar image for rolyatkcinmai
    Rolyatkcinmai

    2763

    Forum Posts

    16308

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #60  Edited By Rolyatkcinmai

    @lolwot said:

    @Rolyatkcinmai said:

    It's easy to say no to this kind of thing until you think about time spent vs cost. It takes like 90 minutes to essentially accrue what would cost $3. Is your time not worth more than $2/hour?

    I'm not supporting it, just saying...

    You do realize that the process of unlocking items is intentionally tedious and time consuming to lead people to spending real-world money on virtual items, right? The solution is to have some dignity and self-respect, and not play the manipulative multiplayer mode at all.

    Which is precisely what I said and did, yes. This was hardly worth a thread necro.

    Avatar image for lolwot
    lolwot

    409

    Forum Posts

    46909

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #61  Edited By lolwot

    deleted

    Avatar image for lukeweizer
    Lukeweizer

    3304

    Forum Posts

    24753

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #62  Edited By Lukeweizer

    You are the reason EA keeps doing this shit.

    Avatar image for jace
    Jace

    1154

    Forum Posts

    12

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #63  Edited By Jace

    @lolwot said:

    @MideonNViscera said:

    @Jace said:

    But...even the most expensive pack only takes 2-3 games to unlock. Why would you do that? Shit. He's going to be a statistic in a marketing conference where they can point and say, "See, gamers love to spend money on RANDOM GAME ITEMS THAT EQUATE TO AN HOUR OF PLAY."

    This is why I cringe when Jeff encourages people to vote with their wallet. His reasoning is completely valid, but a sucker is born every minute. If suckers have enough buying power, they can really fuck the rest of us over.

    So instead of saying, "Vote with your wallet. If you like spending money on random easily-attainable items, please continue to do so." I'm going to say, "Stop it."

    So you're pissed about what someone else does with their money. Great perspective there.

    How people spend their money will have an impact on how these games are designed in the future. If this micro-transaction model is wildly successful for EA, then it's likely it will become very pervasive. If the other major publishers follow in EA's footsteps, then this sort of exploitative game design could become a new standard rather than just an odd exception.

    ^. I thought I explained that pretty clearly, or at least thought it was implied heavily.

    Mideon if you'll actually read the post and think on it for a second without trying to reduce it to a clever one-liner response, it might make more sense.

    Avatar image for mideonnviscera
    MideonNViscera

    2269

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #64  Edited By MideonNViscera

    @lolwot said:

    @MideonNViscera said:

    @Jace said:

    But...even the most expensive pack only takes 2-3 games to unlock. Why would you do that? Shit. He's going to be a statistic in a marketing conference where they can point and say, "See, gamers love to spend money on RANDOM GAME ITEMS THAT EQUATE TO AN HOUR OF PLAY."

    This is why I cringe when Jeff encourages people to vote with their wallet. His reasoning is completely valid, but a sucker is born every minute. If suckers have enough buying power, they can really fuck the rest of us over.

    So instead of saying, "Vote with your wallet. If you like spending money on random easily-attainable items, please continue to do so." I'm going to say, "Stop it."

    So you're pissed about what someone else does with their money. Great perspective there.

    How people spend their money will have an impact on how these games are designed in the future. If this micro-transaction model is wildly successful for EA, then it's likely it will become very pervasive. If the other major publishers follow in EA's footsteps, then this sort of exploitative game design could become a new standard rather than just an odd exception.

    It's not exploitative. You don't have to buy it. Even better, you don't have to pay to get the stuff he paid for haha

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.