Just playing through the first two games again. I know a lot of people are upset about the apparent change in motivation and purpose of the Reapers in 3, but I believe I've found an even more horrifying breakdown in continuity and consistency of lore: REFUND GUY IS DIFFERENT IN ALL 3 GAMES. In the first game we meet him in the wards market, trying to get a refund for an unnamed "mod". In the second game "he" can be found at a warehouse in Zakera Ward and names the item he's trying to recoup his funds for: a "Cision Omnigel Converter". While this could be considered a mod, there's just one problem, demonstrated in the following side-by-side comparison photo:

As if that's bad enough, if you choose to support the merchant he's STILL trying to get a refund from in the third game, he says he was trying to get a refund for a TOASTER OVEN? Why the change in story, BioWare? Do you expect us to believe there are THREE DIFFERENT GUYS trying to get refunds on the Citadel throughout the 3 games, and that we just HAPPEN to run into them? I demand ANSWERS! Give us REFUND GUY DLC, or give us a REFUND!

Where is Refund Shields when you need him?

This thread is a'okay.

at this point mocking the people angry about the ending is now lame.

we must now mock the people who mock the people who are angry at the ending.

If I can't punch, headbutt or shoot him in the foot, I'm not interested...

@Animasta said:

at this point mocking the people angry about the ending is now lame.

we must now mock the people who mock the people who are angry at the ending.

It is the only way I can feel anymore.

Fuck you guys, this thread was hilarious! OP is followed.

@Animasta said:

at this point mocking the people angry about the ending is now lame.

we must now mock the people who mock the people who are angry at the ending.

Complaining about people who are upset is just as lame.

I found this to be pretty funny.

This needs a motto like "Retake the Toaster."

This is pretty awesome.

Does bioware have no shame?