Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Mirror's Edge Catalyst

    Game » consists of 6 releases. Released Jun 07, 2016

    A reboot of the previously singleton franchise, this game features Faith using parkour in an open-world.

    EA rejects Mirror's Edge 2 pitch.

    • 89 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for bulletproofmonk
    BulletproofMonk

    2749

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #1  Edited By BulletproofMonk

    So yeah, I guess Mirror's Edge 2 isn't happening anymore. At least for now. Here's a copy of the news article from Eurogamer: 
     

    Development of Mirror's Edge 2 has been "stopped" by EA.

    A team at DICE showed EA a prototype that was "declined", according to a Eurogamer Sweden translation of a Press 2 Play TV report.

    "Patrick [Soderlund - EA driving and shooting game boss] acknowledges that Mirror's Edge didn't match up to their expectations regarding sales, and that has stopped the sequel that has been in development," declared the report, published originally in December.

    "EA was shown a prototype, but declined with askance. The project has been stopped - involved parties at DICE are working on something else now. Patrick himself seems to have Mirror's Edge near his heart, but they are not in the business of charity."

    Presumably the extra development is going into Battlefield 3 - EA's well publicised attempt at wrestling shooter supremacy from the Call of Duty series.

    Patrick Soderlund confirmed last summer that "a small team" at DICE was 'on' a new Mirror's Edge game. Eurogamer pressed him on that point last November.

    "Mirror's Edge is an IP that's close to my heart and EA's as well. It was a bold move from us. I'm proud we made it. It obviously didn't reach the commercial success we wanted, even though it wasn't bad at all," he said.

    "I still think as a company we're going to talk about it when we're going to talk about it. What I can say is, we haven't buried it. We're absolutely continuing to support Mirror's Edge as an IP. When we're ready to talk about it, we'll talk about it."

    EA Games boss Frank Gibeau went on record a few weeks later to say that the execution of Mirror's Edge "fell short". "There were issues with the learning curve, the difficulty, the narrative, and then there was no multiplayer either," he said.

    Mirror's Edge, a Parkour-inspired first-person action game, was released late 2009 on PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. Despite an 8/10 recommendation from Eurogamer, the eye-catching title failed to, well, catch punters' eyes - entering the UK all-formats chart at 20.

    Eurogamer has requested comment from EA.

       
    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-02-14-report-ea-rejects-mirrors-edge-2-pitch     
     
    Kind of a bummer. Mirror's Edge had some great potential. Some improvements with the combat and it would've been fantastic. Oh well, at least they're not completely abandoning it, which gives some hope. 
     
    Also, couldn't come up with a better title. Lazy.
    Avatar image for thedoublej
    TheDoubleJ

    222

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    #2  Edited By TheDoubleJ
    @BulletproofMonk:
    yeah i'll stay hopeful mirror's edge had problems but there are no games like it 
    Avatar image for jacdg
    jacdg

    2189

    Forum Posts

    373

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #3  Edited By jacdg

    Aw man, this makes me sad, problems and all, Mirror's Edge is one of my favorite games this generation I absolutely love the style, the music, art design, nearly everything about it actually. Are there any change another publisher could pick it up? Or are DICE owned by EA?

    Avatar image for mordukai
    mordukai

    8516

    Forum Posts

    398

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #4  Edited By mordukai

    Well you know...If DICE had put the game through proper QA then a lot of issues would have been resolved. Mirror's Edge was a nice refreshing new IP that had charm but was plagued with some really odd design choices. As far as I'm concern EA is in the right.  
     
    And again EA seems to think that MP=Longevity. That's ok Dead Space 2 is going to teach them a harsh lesson why MP  doesn't need to be in every freaking game. 

    Avatar image for bigsmoke77
    bigsmoke77

    853

    Forum Posts

    44

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By bigsmoke77

    I bet EA would give the game a go ahead if the plan was to put perks and killstreaks in it.

    Avatar image for three0nefive
    Three0neFive

    2446

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By Three0neFive

    I know everyone likes to shit on EA's vision of every game having multiplayer (and rightfully so, usually), but I think Mirror's Edge multiplayer would actually be pretty awesome. Sure, you'd probably have some shitty deathmatch mode or something tacked on, but imagine a cops and robbers style mode, or even a terrorist hunt style mode.

    Avatar image for nick_verissimo
    nick_verissimo

    1477

    Forum Posts

    403

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 9

    #7  Edited By nick_verissimo

    It's pretty unfortunate, but ultimately it does come down to a company's bottom line when you want to go on and make a sequel.  Mirror's Edge had a lot of interesting things going on in that game and, even though it's not dead, it seems like were never going to know where the potential of that series could go.  It's just sort of annoying that new styles of games aren't allowed to grow when they don't earn enough money the first time around.  Oh well, I'm hopeful that the game eventually gets a sequel or at least another company does the first-person parkour thing.

    Avatar image for x19
    X19

    2370

    Forum Posts

    39

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #8  Edited By X19

    I wonder how many years EA will carry on with thinking a game is pointless without mp. Mirrors Edge showed that  parkour and a feeling of movement could work in a FPS. Even if a second game doesn't get made I'm glad that other devs have seen this and our implementing it in to their games.

    Avatar image for frankcanada97
    FrankCanada97

    4186

    Forum Posts

    24056

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #9  Edited By FrankCanada97
    @Mordukai said:
    " Well you know...If DICE had put the game through proper QA then a lot of issues would have been resolved. Mirror's Edge was a nice refreshing new IP that had charm but was plagued with some really odd design choices. As far as I'm concern EA is in the right.   And again EA seems to think that MP=Longevity. That's ok Dead Space 2 is going to teach them a harsh lesson why MP  doesn't need to be in every freaking game.  "
    Why wouldn't they? Battlefield 2 was one of their best selling games and people are still playing it.
    Avatar image for jorbear
    jorbear

    2570

    Forum Posts

    28

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 6

    #10  Edited By jorbear

    MIrror's Edge definitely wasn't a game for me, but it is still sad to see it go. At least the resources spent in this are going to Battlefield 3.

    Avatar image for professoress
    ProfessorEss

    7962

    Forum Posts

    160

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #11  Edited By ProfessorEss

    I'm always torn when Mirror's Edge 2 is brought up.
    On one hand it was pretty good, and pretty original.
    But at the same time, it wasn't that good and I'm not convinced a sequel would be that much better.
     
    It reminds me of Crackdown, in that I think we needed an Infamous more than we needed a Crackdown 2 (if you catch my drift).

    Avatar image for jozzy
    jozzy

    2053

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #12  Edited By jozzy

    Yeah, a multiplayer mode where you have to "race" eachother actually sounds like a lot of fun for this game.

    Avatar image for mordukai
    mordukai

    8516

    Forum Posts

    398

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #13  Edited By mordukai
    @FrankCanada97 said:
    " @Mordukai said:
    " Well you know...If DICE had put the game through proper QA then a lot of issues would have been resolved. Mirror's Edge was a nice refreshing new IP that had charm but was plagued with some really odd design choices. As far as I'm concern EA is in the right.   And again EA seems to think that MP=Longevity. That's ok Dead Space 2 is going to teach them a harsh lesson why MP  doesn't need to be in every freaking game.  "
    Why wouldn't they? Battlefield 2 was one of their best selling games and people are still playing it. "
    In FPS maybe. Only good MP adds longevity. Go look at the numbers and see which MP are being played on xbl and psn. Not every game needs MP. As proven by the first game which still has a strong community with no MP.
    Avatar image for somejerk
    SomeJerk

    4077

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #14  Edited By SomeJerk

    The current Dice QA team was the one that worked on BC2:Vietnam QA, so if it's down to them it's no surprise.
     
    And besides, it's all about taking down Call of Duty now.

    Avatar image for 234rqsd2323d2
    234r2we232

    3175

    Forum Posts

    2007

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 16

    #15  Edited By 234r2we232

    EA will only lke it if you can turn it into an annual franchise. Also, DLC.

    Avatar image for ___pocalypse
    ___pocalypse

    566

    Forum Posts

    253

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By ___pocalypse

    Bummer. I like Mirror's Edge a lot, and I think a sequel could do awesome things. I think multiplayer would be interesting, either timed trials or some kind of co-op mode (which could be infuriatingly hard but still fun), but I can see how it wouldn't be a priority kind of game. I loved the narrative style and the visuals stand up pretty well even though it's several years old at this point. I'd really love to see something in the future, even if it's way far down the road.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f8ac39b52e76
    deactivated-5f8ac39b52e76

    2590

    Forum Posts

    1360

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 3

    Guess I will play through ME another five times then. As for the odd design choices, two come to mind: The jarring cutscenes and the weapons. I made it a point to play through this game not shooting dudes, because I didn't feel the tacked-on gunplay . 
     
    I was looking forward to ME2 being released some day with great artstyle and another kickass soundtrack by Magnus Birgersson. Bummer.

    Avatar image for ventilaator
    ventilaator

    1569

    Forum Posts

    179

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 11

    #18  Edited By ventilaator

    I liked MIrror's Edge a lot as it was, so I would definitely be interested in a sequel developed from the point of view that there were serious issues that need to be addressed, because THAT game would be amazing.

    Avatar image for mordukai
    mordukai

    8516

    Forum Posts

    398

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #19  Edited By mordukai
     @JacDG: DICE is owned by EA lock stock.  If EA says Mirror's Edge is on hold then know it's on hold. 
     
    @somejerk:
     I don't think the AQ team is to blame but more DICE and EA for rushing it and not giving ample time for the AQ team to do their job. There were parts in Mirror's Edge where you seriously had to question the developers.  
     
    THis also might be some PR going on over there. Remember  how Jaffe flat out publicly denied he was working on a new Twisted Metal. Shiiiiit, he even went as far as telling people he will not be at E3. Not even as a visitor. 
    Avatar image for jayzilla
    Jayzilla

    2709

    Forum Posts

    18

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 7

    #20  Edited By Jayzilla

    good. the first game is rubbish.

    Avatar image for psykhophear
    psykhophear

    1277

    Forum Posts

    38896

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 142

    #21  Edited By psykhophear

    No Caption Provided
    "YOU CRETINS!!!"
    Avatar image for sameeeeam
    sameeeeam

    2469

    Forum Posts

    687

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #22  Edited By sameeeeam

    Mirror's Edge had a lot of cool ideas going for it. It could have done well with a sequel.

    Avatar image for ryanwho
    ryanwho

    12011

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By ryanwho

    Hey DICE, have fun attempting to key into the COD demographic with more watered down versions of Battlefield games year to year.

    Avatar image for obsidian
    Obsidian

    347

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #24  Edited By Obsidian

    Mirror's Edge is still one of my favorite games to go back to.  I was really looking forward to seeing what they were going to do with the sequel.  Today is a sad day.

    Avatar image for raginglion
    RagingLion

    1395

    Forum Posts

    6600

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    #25  Edited By RagingLion

    *looks up at sky*   "NNnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!"
     
    I'm extremely disappointed about this and seriously, shut up about multiplayer.  You're chucking away so many innovative game ideas if you then force multiplayer on a world/concept where it just doesn't fit or is just ultimately pretty pointless or arbitrary if you create it.

    Avatar image for time allen
    time allen

    2329

    Forum Posts

    29

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By time allen

     "There were issues with the learning curve, the difficulty, the narrative, and then there was no multiplayer either,"   
    upsets me so much that guys like this are the ones who make the big calls. if this is true and not some hokey "ooh let's reel them in" publicity stunt, then wave goodbye to the most original ip to have come along in the last ten years.

    Avatar image for dr_vonboogie
    Dr_VonBoogie

    365

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #27  Edited By Dr_VonBoogie

    I'm not sure I properly understand, from what I read it sounds as though they just put Mirror's Edge 2 on hold. If that's the case then I'll just have to be patient.

    Avatar image for slyspider
    slyspider

    1832

    Forum Posts

    14

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #28  Edited By slyspider

    i loved the first game, 2015 ill be playing the second, my guess

    Avatar image for jasonr86
    JasonR86

    10468

    Forum Posts

    449

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 17

    User Lists: 5

    #29  Edited By JasonR86

    This is to bad.  I liked the first game despite the fact that it wasn't that good of a game.  I thought there was a lot of potential with this idea and the mechanics they developed.  They just needed to fine tune what was good and either entirely fix or remove what was bad (ex; the fighting).  At least EA publish the first game.  They took a chance and that's more then what a lot of publishers would do.  Remember, Mirror's Edge came out right around the time Dead Space did.  Both were pretty big chances from EA's perspective.  That's cool EA did that.  I hope they keep doing it.  I was hoping they would do it with Mirror's Edge 2 but I understand why they didn't. 

    Avatar image for coaxmetal
    coaxmetal

    1835

    Forum Posts

    855

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #30  Edited By coaxmetal

    Bummer, a sequel could have done a lot for that franchise. I mean, simply getting rid of the combat could have made that game much much better, and using better animated cutscenes would have helped too. The actual parkour-style gameplay parts of the game were fantastic, it was all the other crap that was wrapped around it that was a problem. 
     
    Also, citing that the problem is difficulty and lack of MP is stupid.

    Avatar image for jcannihilates
    JCannihilates

    19

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #31  Edited By JCannihilates

    Dear EA, I don't want multiplayer in all my games. If you put all that effort into the single player instead of dividing it between the two you can create an engaging and rewarding experience people will still play over and over. Look at Vanquish for example. Or, in your own company, Mass Effect or Dragon Age. I don't see anyone still playing Bioshock 2 just because you dumped a multiplayer mode into it.

    Avatar image for meowayne
    Meowayne

    6168

    Forum Posts

    223

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 12

    #32  Edited By Meowayne

      
    Well fuck. The first one is easily one of my favorite games this generation. 
     
    More explosion simulators it is, then.
     
    Edit: While I think that the concept of cramming multiplayer into games that don't need it is one of the most retarded and harmful ones the industry has today, I did thoroughly miss competetive "races" in the first Mirror's Edge and wished very badly that the game had multiplayer.
    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #33  Edited By Hailinel
     "There were issues with the learning curve, the difficulty, the narrative, and then there was no multiplayer either," he said.
     
    Yes, because the lack of multiplayer was what everyone complained about. :|
    Avatar image for little_socrates
    Little_Socrates

    5847

    Forum Posts

    1570

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 23

    #34  Edited By Little_Socrates
    @JCannihilates said:
    "  I don't see anyone still playing Bioshock 2 just because you dumped a multiplayer mode into it. "
    That's because 2K dumped a multiplayer mode into it, not EA. And I'll agree with everyone here who thinks a Mirror's Edge multiplayer would actually be pretty cool if it emphasized the chase aspect of the game. The only games EA doesn't seem to be messing with are the BioWare titles because those are already wildly successful as things stand. Besides, EA's getting their multiplayer BioWare game with The Old Republic.
     
    I doubt I would have bought a Mirror's Edge 2 if they had made it. That game was fine, but the fiction and the aesthetic didn't entice me at all. The music was pretty good, and the parkour gameplay was fun, but that's all I liked about it. One of the sequences in the finale (the large room with about 12 dudes with machine guns) was almost as ill-advised as the last circle of Hell in Dante's Inferno and severely soured my experience with the game. 
     
    I'm glad I played Mirror's Edge, but I really have no interest in playing a sequel. Rather than having those folks work on Battlefield 3, though, can't we have them work on a new IP that uses elements of Mirror's Edge in a game that's more openly palatable?
    Avatar image for benjaebe
    benjaebe

    2868

    Forum Posts

    7204

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #35  Edited By benjaebe

    My heart sank a little when I read this. I absolutely loved the first game.
     
    I can't help but question EA's judgement. I mean....they green-lit an Army of Two sequel. Surely they can afford to put Mirror's Edge out there.

    Avatar image for napalm
    napalm

    9227

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #36  Edited By napalm
    @bigsmoke77 said:
    " I bet EA would give the game a go ahead if the plan was to put perks and killstreaks in it. "
    Yeah this would probably the unfortunate truth. I think if they focused 100 percent on making Mirror's Edge about the parkour and traversal-based gameplay from the first-person perspective, I think these guys could have something brilliant.
    Avatar image for venatio
    Venatio

    4757

    Forum Posts

    288

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #37  Edited By Venatio
    @JacDG said:

    " Aw man, this makes me sad, problems and all, Mirror's Edge is one of my favorite games this generation I absolutely love the style, the music, art design, nearly everything about it actually. Are there any change another publisher could pick it up? Or are DICE owned by EA? "

    You said everything I was gonna say, this bums me out alot, I've been waiting for a long time for some news on this game
     
    And yeah, EA owns DICE sadly, they're just focusing everything on BF3 :(
     
    A sequel could be amazing
    Avatar image for endlessobsidian
    EndlessObsidian

    523

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #38  Edited By EndlessObsidian

    Fuck. 
     
    Oh well, look on the bright side, at least we will prolly be getting a new FPS with an online component which features some sort of leveling system. We haven't had one of them in a while. :-/ 

    Avatar image for babblinmule
    babblinmule

    1280

    Forum Posts

    46

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #39  Edited By babblinmule

    Damn thats depressing, the 1st one was probably my game of the year for 2008!

    Avatar image for liquidprince
    LiquidPrince

    17073

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #40  Edited By LiquidPrince

    Meh.

    Avatar image for azteck
    Azteck

    7415

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #41  Edited By Azteck

    FUCK. I really wanted this sequel. Goddammit.

    Avatar image for finalwish
    Finalwish

    36

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #42  Edited By Finalwish

    EA really love putting MP into everything, I dont really see why they wouldnt make a new one, of course a new concept of gaming isnt going to top charts in a world currently ruled by CoD and Halo. 
     
    Lets just hope Battlefield 3 lives up to the hype because it seems that 100% of dice are now on it after cancelling every other game they were on.

    Avatar image for iam3green
    iam3green

    14368

    Forum Posts

    350

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #43  Edited By iam3green

    well that sucks. it was a good game i played a little bit of it. i thought it was different to play.  
     
    i don't know about battlefield 3. it might be good but it not. they might put something in there that might change the game to a different game. when battlefield2  that came out on the consoles, it was totally different compared to the one on PC. 
     
    EA is just thinks that everygame needs multiplayer in it. games don't really need multiplayer to be good. there are some awesome single player games that didn't have multiplayer.

    Avatar image for captain_clayman
    captain_clayman

    3349

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #44  Edited By captain_clayman

    SON OF A-- 
     
    i want a second mirror's edge :(

    Avatar image for greggd
    GreggD

    4596

    Forum Posts

    981

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #45  Edited By GreggD
    @sofacitysweetheart said:
    " EA will only lke it if you can turn it into an annual franchise. "
    That's old thinking.
    Avatar image for droop
    droop

    1929

    Forum Posts

    710

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 7

    #46  Edited By droop

    Mirror's Edge is a great game, people just didn't know how to play it and then started calling it bad :x 
     
    I'd love to see a sequel.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f00787182625
    deactivated-5f00787182625

    3325

    Forum Posts

    604

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    I really liked Mirrors Edge, I got it in the steam sale last xmas and it was the most pleasant of surprises. It's a shame this has happened, but if it means they are putting more people on BF3 then I don't mind. 

    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #48  Edited By Jimbo

    The first game was alright, but I don't think it did well enough for them to justify a sequel.  Dead Space was lucky enough to get one imo, let alone Mirror's Edge.

    Avatar image for aetheldod
    Aetheldod

    3914

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #49  Edited By Aetheldod
    @Droop said:
    " Mirror's Edge is a great game, people just didn't know how to play it and then started calling it bad :x  I'd love to see a sequel. "
    Yeah , I fail to see what was wrong with it ..... in moments like this I still remember the crappy "evil corporate EA" of yore , so its official I wont be playing B3. Cant Dice just simple say FU EA we will publish it by ourselves?
    Avatar image for onemanx
    OneManX

    1728

    Forum Posts

    50

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 6

    #50  Edited By OneManX
    @Aetheldod:  If DICE had to money to develop and publish/market their own boxed retail game.. they wouldn't be working for EA. 
     
    Edit: i'm shocked that people get upset that companies do things to make money, that is what matters. You can take risk here and there (hell EA took 2 the same year in Dead Space and Mirror's Edge), but in gaming those risk can lead to HUGE losses, the first Mirror's Edge was okay, but nothing more than okay, I can see EA's point about not making a sequel to a game that didn't do to well, retail wise.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.