Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Monday Night Combat

    Game » consists of 3 releases. Released Aug 11, 2010

    A multiplayer-focused third-person shooter that borrows elements from both Team Fortress 2 and Defense of the Ancients. Take control of one of six personified Classes and defend your Moneyball in a futuristic sports environment.

    I really enjoy this game, but I refuse to buy it...

    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By hatking

    I have had a small interest in this game since I saw the trailers for it a month or so ago.  It came out and I heard great things, I downloaded the trial and played bits of it, enjoying it.  TNT came out and confirmed this game is pretty awesome.  I played more of the trial and enjoyed playing with other people(something I normally hate). 
     
    I will not buy this game. 
     
    I know that seems backwards.  The reason I can't justify buying this game is, sadly, because it is a online dependent XBLA game.  This means, or will likely mean, that in about two months it will be a struggle to play this game.  In three months it will be nigh impossible.  And by January, you might as well not even own it.  Even if I'd be done with it by then, I just can't buy something that I know I won't be able to use in that short of time. 
     
    If the game had offered a single player component: bot matches, a story, anything, I could maybe justify it.  Okay, I guess I shouldn't say anything, there is that "tower defense" mode that you can play solo, but I hardly count that considering you pretty much need more people to stand a chance. 
     
    Do you guys think I'm wrong?  Will this game last?  Will it defy the norm that has been set for, almost, all previous XBLA games and stand the test of time?  Perhaps I'm missing something else.  Is there a single player component that I have missed or overlooked? 
     
    I know it seems irrational, but I like this game, I just can't justify buying it.
    Avatar image for malakhii
    Malakhii

    1444

    Forum Posts

    80

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #2  Edited By Malakhii

    For 15 bucks if you get a week or two out of it, that's more then enough value for me.  I don't expect a $15 game to keep me enthralled forever, but the time I played it was very fun. So if you enjoy it buy it, I know the team at Uber has pledged to support it, so it should have some legs. 

    Avatar image for wickedcestus
    WickedCestus

    3779

    Forum Posts

    1123

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 7

    #3  Edited By WickedCestus

    I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft.

    Avatar image for dantheman1515
    dantheman1515

    318

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #4  Edited By dantheman1515

    It will always have people playing it. There is only one gametype so the community won't be segmented.

    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By hatking
    @Malakhii:
    You do bring up an interesting point.  They've created a unique system for delivering updates to the game, or at least that's what I heard; it does not require updates.  Perhaps this means that they can keep it fresh?  I don't know.   I just don't like the idea that if I get the urge to play it again in a few months that I won't be able to.  I mean, sure maybe I will get to play $15 worth of it for the next few weeks, but... I bought it... shouldn't that mean I can play it on my time not while it's convenient for everybody else? 
     
    Sorry, this seems whiney.  Maybe I'll just suck it up and buy it.  Perhaps it's worth the risk.  I'm certainly not solving this XBLA abandonship problem by avoiding the games entirely.
    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By hatking
    @dantheman1515:
    I'd like to think you're right, but there really is no way to guarantee that.
    Avatar image for masterofpenguins_zell
    MasterOfPenguins_Zell

    2120

    Forum Posts

    2521

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    I've played around 100 hours of it already, and am likely to play some more before Reach comes out, so I'd say it was worth it.

    Avatar image for illmatic19
    illmatic19

    1015

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #8  Edited By illmatic19

    I played the trial on three different accounts. I had my fun with it.

    Avatar image for xyzygy
    xyzygy

    10595

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #9  Edited By xyzygy

    It's an online only game, a headliner from the Summer of Arcade, and it got great reviews. I think there'll be people playing it for a while. 
     
    Usually I find the online games that don't have anyone playing anymore are either really old games like Castle Crashers or games with a single player component as well as multiplayer, like Assault on Dark Athena. 

    Avatar image for hamst3r
    Hamst3r

    5520

    Forum Posts

    7837

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 2

    #10  Edited By Hamst3r

    You say that no one is going to be playing the game in 3 months, so you - and a whole lot of other people who think the same way as you - are going to make sure that's true by not buying it.
      
    Sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
     
    You should buy the game rather than assisting in it's death.
    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By hatking
    @Hamst3r said:
    "You say that no one is going to be playing the game in 3 months, so you - and a whole lot of other people who think the same way as you - are going to make sure that's true by not buying it.   Sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy.   You should buy the game rather than assisting in it's death. "

    You're very right. : )  
     
    Being morally against this idea, it should be my duty to buy this game.
    Avatar image for tracerace11
    tracerace11

    317

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #12  Edited By tracerace11

    bought it.... love it.......  i think it will be around for awhile because of the focus on mutliplayer.... and a focus on one game mode....

    Avatar image for cl60
    CL60

    17117

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #13  Edited By CL60

    I'm sure people will be playing it for a while.. It's like a console players TF2, because well.. console TF2 is terrible.

    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #14  Edited By hatking

    Okay, after seeing a few of the responses here, and realizing I'm only exacerbating the abandonship problem by not buying it, I decided to dive in. 
     
    I bought the game at some point last night and have enjoyed almost every second of it since.  My only complaints are some lag issues, and some small annoyances with players abusing certain abilities(though this is to be expected with any game).  The frame rate problems really only came up in Blitz mode, but there I'm just fighting NPCs so I don't care so much. 
     
    Love the game, I just hope it keeps going so I can come back to it in a few months.

    Avatar image for lclay
    lclay

    401

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #15  Edited By lclay

    Battlefield 1943 came out during last year's summer of arcade and there's still tonnes of people playing that.

    Avatar image for lordxavierbritish
    LordXavierBritish

    6651

    Forum Posts

    4948

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 6

    People still play Marble Blast, your argument is invalid.
     

    MARBLE BLAST IS FUCKING AWESOME BY THE WAY

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #17  Edited By Jeust
    @supermike6 said:
    " I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft. "
    It's not really that different. Lara Croft is though to play with friends. It has single player, but seems an afterthought. 
    Avatar image for epicsteve
    EpicSteve

    6908

    Forum Posts

    13016

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 89

    User Lists: 11

    #18  Edited By EpicSteve

    For $15 would that really matter? Can you seriously see yourself caring about MNC in January? People do still play Battlefield 1943 btw.

    Avatar image for wickedcestus
    WickedCestus

    3779

    Forum Posts

    1123

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 7

    #19  Edited By WickedCestus
    @Jeust said:
    " @supermike6 said:
    " I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft. "
    It's not really that different. Lara Croft is though to play with friends. It has single player, but seems an afterthought.  "
    Yeah, but I have a brother to play split-screen with. He won't be gone in a month. Also, the single-player is surprisingly good.
    Avatar image for imperiousrix
    ImperiousRix

    3095

    Forum Posts

    1964

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 45

    User Lists: 4

    #20  Edited By ImperiousRix

    I think you certainly make a point, but there will ALWAYS be a contingent of people that play this game.  Okay... perhaps not always, but at least for a couple years to come now.  I got Shadowrun... yes... Shadow-fucking-Run about a year after its release.  Every time I played that game, there were full lobbies  Sure, it only had a few hundred players still faithfully active, but they were there. 
    I find you don't really need a justification for not purchasing a game that you actually like.  I've sincerely liked quite a few games, followed them, got the demos, etc., only to not pick them up at release time.  Sometimes some games just fall through the cracks, regardless of quality or previous interest in them. 
     
    EDIT:  And now I see that you actually bought the game... IGNORE MEEE!

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #21  Edited By Jeust
    @supermike6 said:
    " @Jeust said:
    " @supermike6 said:
    " I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft. "
    It's not really that different. Lara Croft is though to play with friends. It has single player, but seems an afterthought.  "
    Yeah, but I have a brother to play split-screen with. He won't be gone in a month. Also, the single-player is surprisingly good. "
    Then that is different. :)
    Avatar image for louiedog
    louiedog

    2391

    Forum Posts

    227

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #22  Edited By louiedog
    @Jeust said:
    " @supermike6 said:
    " I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft. "
    It's not really that different. Lara Croft is though to play with friends. It has single player, but seems an afterthought.  "
    I'm not sure how you define afterthought. They redid all of the puzzles for a single player. What did you want, an entirely new campaign? The single player in the game is excellent.
    Avatar image for afroman269
    Afroman269

    7440

    Forum Posts

    103

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #23  Edited By Afroman269

    Same way that I feel

    Avatar image for colt
    Colt

    129

    Forum Posts

    1342

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 17

    #24  Edited By Colt

    dude i played big bumping at like 3 am a few months ago and got a game going in one try. yknow.. the burger king game from 4 years ago.  
     
    a game like this will never stop having available players.

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #25  Edited By Jeust
    @louiedog said:
    " @Jeust said:
    " @supermike6 said:
    " I completely agree. I like this game, but I can't get myself to buy it. I ended up saving my money for Lara Croft. "
    It's not really that different. Lara Croft is though to play with friends. It has single player, but seems an afterthought.  "
    I'm not sure how you define afterthought. They redid all of the puzzles for a single player. What did you want, an entirely new campaign? The single player in the game is excellent. "
    yep, but they for no reason, to suppress the need of the indian counterpart gave her the ability to act like him in the puzzles that would need him. It seems like it was first thought as a co-op experience and then as a single player one. 
    Avatar image for mighty
    Mighty

    1473

    Forum Posts

    2434

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #26  Edited By Mighty

    That's true with some games, but this one seems like it could have lasting value. I played the hell out of it. It was worth the 15
    Avatar image for azteck
    Azteck

    7415

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #27  Edited By Azteck

    The argument works both ways. With a single-player only game, you'll play it once or twice and probably not play it again. You're more likely to play a MP-only game for longer than a SP-only game.

    Avatar image for youngfrey
    YoungFrey

    1363

    Forum Posts

    10811

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #28  Edited By YoungFrey
    @HatKing said:
    " @Malakhii:
    You do bring up an interesting point.  They've created a unique system for delivering updates to the game, or at least that's what I heard; it does not require updates.  Perhaps this means that they can keep it fresh?  I don't know.   I just don't like the idea that if I get the urge to play it again in a few months that I won't be able to.  I mean, sure maybe I will get to play $15 worth of it for the next few weeks, but... I bought it... shouldn't that mean I can play it on my time not while it's convenient for everybody else?  Sorry, this seems whiney.  Maybe I'll just suck it up and buy it.  Perhaps it's worth the risk.  I'm certainly not solving this XBLA abandonship problem by avoiding the games entirely. "
    I don't know about fresh, but as I understand it, the current "instant update" system allows them to change variables.  I don't think they will be dropping new modes or classes that way.  But it sounds like it's well suited to keeping the game balanced though.   And look at Battlefield 1943.  That game is still popular.  I know any online system has a finite number of players, but MNC does fill a niche that no other game is.  Heavily class based combat.  I know TF2 does it, but lacking any patches, everyone plays that on the PC.  So I think MNC has a real shot at longevity.  
    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #29  Edited By MikkaQ

    15 bucks for a month's worth of entertainment? I'd buy that.  
     
    But I haven't heard a lot about this game so far, so I still dunno. 

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.