Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe Forum

Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe is a video game that consists of 9 releases

Jeff. Please stop reviewing fighting games.

Topic started by funkpanda on Nov. 17, 2008. Last post by BiggerBomb 3 weeks, 6 days ago.
Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating 0 |

Loading...

I knew you would do this Jeff. You are a fanboy through and through. I knew you would give Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe a stellar review in comparison to your shallow, biased, and uneducated review of Soul Calibur 4.

My complaint is that you unfairly judged SC4 based on "dull set of single player modes" yet, you completely IGNORE the fact that MK vs. DC has LESS single player modes.

In MKvsDC you have, Story, Arcade, Kombo Challenge, and Practice.  In SC4 you have, Story, Arcade, Tower, Practice. As well as a robust create a character mode.

MK vs. DC's story mode is significantly better than Soul Calibur 4's because MKvDC has developed cutscenes and is much lengthier. That is true.

Arcade mode is practically the same either way.

Practice Mode options in MK vs DC PALE in comparison to the options you get in Soul Calibur 4.  At least in SC4 you can record a set number of moves and have the training dummy do them to practice certain reactions.

Now Im going to compare 2 different modes of the game, Kombat Challenge and Tower of Souls. Kombat Challenge is 10 kombos that you can do per character.  Which can take a different amount of time based on varying skill levels between players. On the other hand Tower of Souls has 50 floors down AND up. Based on the time alone it takes to complete these, I would figure it gives more play time than MK's Kombo Challenge, but then again, it varies on skill level.

And on top of ALL that, Soul Calibur even has a robust create a character mode! MKvsDC DOESNT EVEN HAVE DIFFERENT COSTUMES FOR EACH CHARACTER!!!

Yet, as you say in your Soul Calibur 4 review you gave it negative marks based on "a dull set of single-player modes".  I ask, what is the difference between the two games in this regard? MKvsDC has a more robust storyline? Give me a break, fanboy.

The one thing I can give you credit for is that you don't judge the game based on fighting mechanics, you leave them for what they are.

Im dissapointed in you, Jeff. Though you dont care. I'll continue to listen to the podcast because your a funny guy. But I'll get my fighting game reviews from 1UP and tell everyone I know to stop listening to your fighting game reviews. Because you obviously can't judge each one fairly.

I knew you would do this Jeff. You are a fanboy through and through. I knew you would give Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe a stellar review in comparison to your shallow, biased, and uneducated review of Soul Calibur 4.

My complaint is that you unfairly judged SC4 based on "dull set of single player modes" yet, you completely IGNORE the fact that MK vs. DC has LESS single player modes.

In MKvsDC you have, Story, Arcade, Kombo Challenge, and Practice.  In SC4 you have, Story, Arcade, Tower, Practice. As well as a robust create a character mode.

MK vs. DC's story mode is significantly better than Soul Calibur 4's because MKvDC has developed cutscenes and is much lengthier. That is true.

Arcade mode is practically the same either way.

Practice Mode options in MK vs DC PALE in comparison to the options you get in Soul Calibur 4.  At least in SC4 you can record a set number of moves and have the training dummy do them to practice certain reactions.

Now Im going to compare 2 different modes of the game, Kombat Challenge and Tower of Souls. Kombat Challenge is 10 kombos that you can do per character.  Which can take a different amount of time based on varying skill levels between players. On the other hand Tower of Souls has 50 floors down AND up. Based on the time alone it takes to complete these, I would figure it gives more play time than MK's Kombo Challenge, but then again, it varies on skill level.

And on top of ALL that, Soul Calibur even has a robust create a character mode! MKvsDC DOESNT EVEN HAVE DIFFERENT COSTUMES FOR EACH CHARACTER!!!

Yet, as you say in your Soul Calibur 4 review you gave it negative marks based on "a dull set of single-player modes".  I ask, what is the difference between the two games in this regard? MKvsDC has a more robust storyline? Give me a break, fanboy.

The one thing I can give you credit for is that you don't judge the game based on fighting mechanics, you leave them for what they are.

Im dissapointed in you, Jeff. Though you dont care. I'll continue to listen to the podcast because your a funny guy. But I'll get my fighting game reviews from 1UP and tell everyone I know to stop listening to your fighting game reviews. Because you obviously can't judge each one fairly.

Post by BiggerBomb (4,135 posts) See mini bio
Rating 1 |

Loading...

Did you play MK vs. DCU?

Did you play MK vs. DCU?

Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating 0 |

Loading...

Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:

"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"


Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"


Post by BiggerBomb (4,135 posts) See mini bio
Rating -1 |

Loading...

funkpanda said:

"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud

funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud

Post by jakob187 (1,716 posts) See mini bio
Rating 9 |

Loading...

Funk, have you thought that maybe YOUR opinion is biased and that you aren't looking at the most important thing?

MK vs. DCU and SC4 are two totally different kind of games.  MK has always been a much more casual game, and therefore, it's got a bit of a different standard to be judged on.

SC4, when compared to previous SC installments, DID have dull single player modes.  Hell, SCIII had a ton of great single-player content, and SC4 fucked it all up (as well as Ivy)...and it's because they focused so hard on the online functionality of it.

Meanwhile, MK had way too many single-player modes, which were half the problems of the past three.  I mean, granted, they were cool modes...but only for the first three or four times you used them.  Other than that, the last three MK games...well...maybe two, because I did enjoy Deadly Alliance...

Yeah, the last two MK games were relatively weak.  Jeff's review was very much about MK coming back to form, and after reading his review, I will definitely need to check the game out.

SC4 got the review it deserved, and if you are buttsore over it, then go ahead and stick with 1Up.  At least I know my review isn't some corporate shit.

Funk, have you thought that maybe YOUR opinion is biased and that you aren't looking at the most important thing?
MK vs. DCU and SC4 are two totally different kind of games.  MK has always been a much more casual game, and therefore, it's got a bit of a different standard to be judged on.

SC4, when compared to previous SC installments, DID have dull single player modes.  Hell, SCIII had a ton of great single-player content, and SC4 fucked it all up (as well as Ivy)...and it's because they focused so hard on the online functionality of it.

Meanwhile, MK had way too many single-player modes, which were half the problems of the past three.  I mean, granted, they were cool modes...but only for the first three or four times you used them.  Other than that, the last three MK games...well...maybe two, because I did enjoy Deadly Alliance...

Yeah, the last two MK games were relatively weak.  Jeff's review was very much about MK coming back to form, and after reading his review, I will definitely need to check the game out.

SC4 got the review it deserved, and if you are buttsore over it, then go ahead and stick with 1Up.  At least I know my review isn't some corporate shit.

Post by Kush (5,008 posts) See mini bio
Rating 8 |

Loading...

So he should stop reviewing games because he has an individual opinion that is unique to himself...ok, guess what...so do you.

So he should stop reviewing games because he has an individual opinion that is unique to himself...ok, guess what...so do you.

Post by MB (2,728 posts) See mini bio
Rating 2 |

Loading...

Online Now
Moderator

I just deleted a few off topic and spam image posts from this thread.  Knock off the spam, please. 

If you don't have anything to say or just want to post some huge ridiculous image, don't even bother replying.  This user made some fair points and at least took the time to write out this post - if you don't agree with him, either say why or don't post at all.

Thank you.

I just deleted a few off topic and spam image posts from this thread.  Knock off the spam, please. 

If you don't have anything to say or just want to post some huge ridiculous image, don't even bother replying.  This user made some fair points and at least took the time to write out this post - if you don't agree with him, either say why or don't post at all.

Thank you.

Post by jakob187 (1,716 posts) See mini bio
Rating 3 |

Loading...

BiggerBomb said:

"So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap..."
Bigger...umm....

DC of all crap to mix into a Mature-rated fighting franchise?  Not a very good argument, bro...

BiggerBomb said:
"So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap..."
Bigger...umm....

DC of all crap to mix into a Mature-rated fighting franchise?  Not a very good argument, bro...

Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating 0 |

Loading...



BiggerBomb
said:

"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
I didn't mention his statement on the characters involved in either game. Did I? Thats a minor point, the same thing could be said about DC characters in the MK world. I said that his review based on SC4's single player modes was shallow he gave it much more scrutiny than he did for MK vs DCU.



BiggerBomb
said:
"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
I didn't mention his statement on the characters involved in either game. Did I? Thats a minor point, the same thing could be said about DC characters in the MK world. I said that his review based on SC4's single player modes was shallow he gave it much more scrutiny than he did for MK vs DCU.

Post by brukaoru (2,553 posts) See mini bio
Rating 5 |

Loading...

I should post here what I posted in Jeff's review, but somehow I know you wouldn't care so I'm not going to bother.

I'll just say that all this hate for someone's opinion is ridiculous.

I should post here what I posted in Jeff's review, but somehow I know you wouldn't care so I'm not going to bother.

I'll just say that all this hate for someone's opinion is ridiculous.

Post by systech (1,392 posts) See mini bio
Rating 3 |

Loading...

No, he just didn't like Soul Calibur IV as much as MKvsDC. It's simple as that.

No, he just didn't like Soul Calibur IV as much as MKvsDC. It's simple as that.

Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating -3 |

Loading...

jakob187 said:

"Funk, have you thought that maybe YOUR opinion is biased and that you aren't looking at the most important thing?
MK vs. DCU and SC4 are two totally different kind of games.  MK has always been a much more casual game, and therefore, it's got a bit of a different standard to be judged on.

SC4, when compared to previous SC installments, DID have dull single player modes.  Hell, SCIII had a ton of great single-player content, and SC4 fucked it all up (as well as Ivy)...and it's because they focused so hard on the online functionality of it.

Meanwhile, MK had way too many single-player modes, which were half the problems of the past three.  I mean, granted, they were cool modes...but only for the first three or four times you used them.  Other than that, the last three MK games...well...maybe two, because I did enjoy Deadly Alliance...

Yeah, the last two MK games were relatively weak.  Jeff's review was very much about MK coming back to form, and after reading his review, I will definitely need to check the game out.

SC4 got the review it deserved, and if you are buttsore over it, then go ahead and stick with 1Up.  At least I know my review isn't some corporate shit.
"

You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review.


jakob187 said:
"Funk, have you thought that maybe YOUR opinion is biased and that you aren't looking at the most important thing?
MK vs. DCU and SC4 are two totally different kind of games.  MK has always been a much more casual game, and therefore, it's got a bit of a different standard to be judged on.

SC4, when compared to previous SC installments, DID have dull single player modes.  Hell, SCIII had a ton of great single-player content, and SC4 fucked it all up (as well as Ivy)...and it's because they focused so hard on the online functionality of it.

Meanwhile, MK had way too many single-player modes, which were half the problems of the past three.  I mean, granted, they were cool modes...but only for the first three or four times you used them.  Other than that, the last three MK games...well...maybe two, because I did enjoy Deadly Alliance...

Yeah, the last two MK games were relatively weak.  Jeff's review was very much about MK coming back to form, and after reading his review, I will definitely need to check the game out.

SC4 got the review it deserved, and if you are buttsore over it, then go ahead and stick with 1Up.  At least I know my review isn't some corporate shit.
"

You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review.


Post by BiggerBomb (4,135 posts) See mini bio
Rating -23 |

Loading...

funkpanda said:

"

BiggerBomb
said:
"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
I didn't mention his statement on the characters involved in either game. Did I? Thats a minor point, the same thing could be said about DC characters in the MK world. I said that his review based on SC4's single player modes was shallow he gave it much more scrutiny than he did for MK vs DCU.
"

No, you fail.

funkpanda said:
"

BiggerBomb
said:
"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
I didn't mention his statement on the characters involved in either game. Did I? Thats a minor point, the same thing could be said about DC characters in the MK world. I said that his review based on SC4's single player modes was shallow he gave it much more scrutiny than he did for MK vs DCU.
"

No, you fail.

Post by sarkeen (179 posts) See mini bio
Rating 5 |

Loading...

Woah, Someone on this website who doesn't agree with everything Jeff does. This is surprising.

Woah, Someone on this website who doesn't agree with everything Jeff does. This is surprising.

Post by MB (2,728 posts) See mini bio
Rating 4 |

Loading...

Online Now
Moderator

I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. 

I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. 

Post by Godzilla_Sushi (141 posts) See mini bio
Rating -1 |

Loading...

BiggerBomb said:

"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
As opposed to DC comics? Same difference? Both properties had a purpose.....$$$$

BiggerBomb said:
"funkpanda said:
"Yes, I bought it and I enjoy it.

My complaint is that he's not being unbiased in his reviews and gave poor marks to SC4 based on cosmetic features.

BiggerBomb said:
"Did you play MK vs. DCU?"

"

So because he gave it a good review, he is biased? Have you ever thought that maybe he gave SC4 a bad review because of the shameless integration of STAR WARS of all crap without a seamless transition and women displayed in ways only a 40 year old virgin living in his mom's attic might think of as he masturbates to whatever PG-13 movie his parents let him get his hands on.

Edit: lulz run on sentinses 4tehwinnre but 2 lazy to edit nd 2 tird 2 tipe gud"
As opposed to DC comics? Same difference? Both properties had a purpose.....$$$$

Post by Dalai (629 posts) See mini bio
Rating 2 |

Loading...

Nobody agrees 100% with anyone... does that mean they shouldn't speak their mind?  If Jeff thinks it's 5-star worthy, then that's fine... if you don't like it, write your own review with a score that you think is deserving.

Nobody agrees 100% with anyone... does that mean they shouldn't speak their mind?  If Jeff thinks it's 5-star worthy, then that's fine... if you don't like it, write your own review with a score that you think is deserving.

Post by LiquidPrince (2,438 posts) See mini bio
Rating 4 |

Loading...

Not that I agree with the TC, but giving MK vs DC the same grade as MGS4 and Gears of War 2 is just weird...

Not that I agree with the TC, but giving MK vs DC the same grade as MGS4 and Gears of War 2 is just weird...

Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating 3 |

Loading...

MB said:

"I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. "

Thing is, I was under the impression that Jeff was a fighting game aficionado. Listening to him talk about the arcades in Tokyo and his ability to hang on the machines with the die hard japanese players. He even went as far as to do a video on Battle Fantasia. I would assume that he has an eclectic taste for fighting games and could review them with an un-biased review.

MB said:
"I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. "

Thing is, I was under the impression that Jeff was a fighting game aficionado. Listening to him talk about the arcades in Tokyo and his ability to hang on the machines with the die hard japanese players. He even went as far as to do a video on Battle Fantasia. I would assume that he has an eclectic taste for fighting games and could review them with an un-biased review.

Post by MB (2,728 posts) See mini bio
Rating 2 |

Loading...

Online Now
Moderator

LiquidPrince said:

"Not that I agree with the TC, but giving MK vs DC the same grade as MGS4 and Gears of War 2 is just weird..."

Forget about the score - five stars means the game is great, it's not meant to be compared with the scores that other games received.

LiquidPrince said:
"Not that I agree with the TC, but giving MK vs DC the same grade as MGS4 and Gears of War 2 is just weird..."

Forget about the score - five stars means the game is great, it's not meant to be compared with the scores that other games received.

Post by BiggerBomb (4,135 posts) See mini bio
Rating -10 |

Loading...

funkpanda said:

"MB said:
"I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. "

Thing is, I was under the impression that Jeff was a fighting game aficionado. Listening to him talk about the arcades in Tokyo and his ability to hang on the machines with the die hard japanese players. He even went as far as to do a video on Battle Fantasia. I would assume that he has an eclectic taste for fighting games and could review them with an un-biased review."

Soul Caliber sucks.

funkpanda said:
"MB said:
"I think Brukaoru made a fair point - a review is a person's opinion and not always completely objective, nor should they be.  Everyone knows that Jeff adores Mortal Kombat, and if that influenced his review, then so be it. "

Thing is, I was under the impression that Jeff was a fighting game aficionado. Listening to him talk about the arcades in Tokyo and his ability to hang on the machines with the die hard japanese players. He even went as far as to do a video on Battle Fantasia. I would assume that he has an eclectic taste for fighting games and could review them with an un-biased review."

Soul Caliber sucks.

Post by Pepsiman (112 posts) See mini bio
Rating 7 |

Loading...

Online Now
Moderator

Hey guys! Let's all hate on each other's opinions because this is the Internet and we totally get to say things here that we wouldn't ever remotely have the courage to utter in person! That's, I dunno, totally the classy thing to do!


And then while we're at it, let's keep on saying how people are incomptent at their jobs because our maturity clearly indicates that we would be better candidates! Let's not ever think of the fact that we could just leave this site if we disagreed with someone's opinion! Of course not! We gotta milk these free memberships for what it's worth by trying to start online fights with the very people who give us a voice here in the first place!

Oh, man is it great to be alive! I don't think I've arbitrarily used more exclamation marks in an entirely non-sarcastic way!

....

Look, Jeff's review is what it is. Did he ever say anywhere that it was the end all that be all when it came to critical opinion of Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe? No? Then I honestly don't see any reason to get up in arms about it to such an extreme extent as to look analgous to triggering a political revolution. You still have the right to reserve your own opinion, but people will only seriously listen to it if you give other people's the time of day. Insulting somebody's occuptation isn't exactly the fast track to making that happen and those sorts of words are best left to a yelling session in front of the mirror.

And to be blunt, most reviewers who have been at it as long as Jeff has developed a super thick skin for these insults. It's a thankless job in a lot of mediums and it's especially true in the gaming industry. Why people get so offended over mere text and scores and beyond me. Is it because there's way too much being read between the lines to the extent where people feel they're told that their purchases weren't really all that worthwhile? I don't know and quite frankly, I don't care since people who have already purchased the games aren't the intended audience of reviews in the first place.

If you like SCIV more than MK vs. DC, then good for you. But what exactly gives you more authority to deem which game is better than Jeff does? Because as far as I can tell, you and he are both people and neither of you are the omnipotent god of the opinion on this matter.

Hey guys! Let's all hate on each other's opinions because this is the Internet and we totally get to say things here that we wouldn't ever remotely have the courage to utter in person! That's, I dunno, totally the classy thing to do!

And then while we're at it, let's keep on saying how people are incomptent at their jobs because our maturity clearly indicates that we would be better candidates! Let's not ever think of the fact that we could just leave this site if we disagreed with someone's opinion! Of course not! We gotta milk these free memberships for what it's worth by trying to start online fights with the very people who give us a voice here in the first place!

Oh, man is it great to be alive! I don't think I've arbitrarily used more exclamation marks in an entirely non-sarcastic way!

....

Look, Jeff's review is what it is. Did he ever say anywhere that it was the end all that be all when it came to critical opinion of Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe? No? Then I honestly don't see any reason to get up in arms about it to such an extreme extent as to look analgous to triggering a political revolution. You still have the right to reserve your own opinion, but people will only seriously listen to it if you give other people's the time of day. Insulting somebody's occuptation isn't exactly the fast track to making that happen and those sorts of words are best left to a yelling session in front of the mirror.

And to be blunt, most reviewers who have been at it as long as Jeff has developed a super thick skin for these insults. It's a thankless job in a lot of mediums and it's especially true in the gaming industry. Why people get so offended over mere text and scores and beyond me. Is it because there's way too much being read between the lines to the extent where people feel they're told that their purchases weren't really all that worthwhile? I don't know and quite frankly, I don't care since people who have already purchased the games aren't the intended audience of reviews in the first place.

If you like SCIV more than MK vs. DC, then good for you. But what exactly gives you more authority to deem which game is better than Jeff does? Because as far as I can tell, you and he are both people and neither of you are the omnipotent god of the opinion on this matter.

Post by jakob187 (1,716 posts) See mini bio
Rating 5 |

Loading...

funkpanda said:

"You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review."
So.....let me get this straight.  You say that because SC4 has a robust amount of single-player options, that automatically makes it a better game?  I'm sorry, but SC4 DID have dull single-player options.
And yeah, it did have character customization...and it didn't honestly make much of a difference.

I mean, I will give it to you that maybe 1 star out of Jeff's review was a "I fucking love MK" star...but it is HIS review.  Hell, if I were an MK fan and saw him this excited after reading his 8.1 review of Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance, or even his 7.9 review of Mortal Kombat II for download on the PS3, then by all means, I would say that this game has to be the second coming of Christ.

Also, you may want to remember that a 5-star on this site is NOT 100%.  Hell, it's usually anywhere between the 80-100% range, so by all means, there is room for interpretation there.

I'm sorry, but I know that Jeff will give an objective view on a game when he reviews it, and he doesn't try to bullshit people.

funkpanda said:
"You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review."
So.....let me get this straight.  You say that because SC4 has a robust amount of single-player options, that automatically makes it a better game?  I'm sorry, but SC4 DID have dull single-player options.
And yeah, it did have character customization...and it didn't honestly make much of a difference.

I mean, I will give it to you that maybe 1 star out of Jeff's review was a "I fucking love MK" star...but it is HIS review.  Hell, if I were an MK fan and saw him this excited after reading his 8.1 review of Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance, or even his 7.9 review of Mortal Kombat II for download on the PS3, then by all means, I would say that this game has to be the second coming of Christ.

Also, you may want to remember that a 5-star on this site is NOT 100%.  Hell, it's usually anywhere between the 80-100% range, so by all means, there is room for interpretation there.

I'm sorry, but I know that Jeff will give an objective view on a game when he reviews it, and he doesn't try to bullshit people.

Post by ThePhenomenal1 (45 posts) See mini bio
Rating 5 |

Loading...

did the thought ever occour that, maybe he just really didn't like SCIV that much? i didn't like SCIV that much. thats my opinion. jeff has his. its his f'n website. deal with it.

did the thought ever occour that, maybe he just really didn't like SCIV that much? i didn't like SCIV that much. thats my opinion. jeff has his. its his f'n website. deal with it.

Post by BiggerBomb (4,135 posts) See mini bio
Rating -4 |

Loading...

jakob187 said:

"funkpanda said:
"You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review."
So.....let me get this straight.  You say that because SC4 has a robust amount of single-player options, that automatically makes it a better game?  I'm sorry, but SC4 DID have dull single-player options.
And yeah, it did have character customization...and it didn't honestly make much of a difference.

I mean, I will give it to you that maybe 1 star out of Jeff's review was a "I fucking love MK" star...but it is HIS review.  Hell, if I were an MK fan and saw him this excited after reading his 8.1 review of Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance, or even his 7.9 review of Mortal Kombat II for download on the PS3, then by all means, I would say that this game has to be the second coming of Christ.

Also, you may want to remember that a 5-star on this site is NOT 100%.  Hell, it's usually anywhere between the 80-100% range, so by all means, there is room for interpretation there.

I'm sorry, but I know that Jeff will give an objective view on a game when he reviews it, and he doesn't try to bullshit people.
"

Nuff' said.

jakob187 said:
"funkpanda said:
"You know what, I am buttsore over it. Because, I point out that Jeff gave a bad score to SC4 because of SINGLE PLAYER OPTIONS. And in a 1 to 1 comparison of all the single player options given by each game, not only does MK vs DC have LESS, they could be said to be less robust. Jeff doesn't even mention that in his MK vs DCU review."
So.....let me get this straight.  You say that because SC4 has a robust amount of single-player options, that automatically makes it a better game?  I'm sorry, but SC4 DID have dull single-player options.
And yeah, it did have character customization...and it didn't honestly make much of a difference.

I mean, I will give it to you that maybe 1 star out of Jeff's review was a "I fucking love MK" star...but it is HIS review.  Hell, if I were an MK fan and saw him this excited after reading his 8.1 review of Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance, or even his 7.9 review of Mortal Kombat II for download on the PS3, then by all means, I would say that this game has to be the second coming of Christ.

Also, you may want to remember that a 5-star on this site is NOT 100%.  Hell, it's usually anywhere between the 80-100% range, so by all means, there is room for interpretation there.

I'm sorry, but I know that Jeff will give an objective view on a game when he reviews it, and he doesn't try to bullshit people.
"

Nuff' said.

Post by sidescroller (216 posts) See mini bio
Rating 5 |

Loading...

Isn't it possible that maybe he just ENJOYED MK vs. DC more than Soul Calibur IV?

And if you already had an opinion about the game, why the hell are you so concerned with his review anyway?

Isn't it possible that maybe he just ENJOYED MK vs. DC more than Soul Calibur IV?

And if you already had an opinion about the game, why the hell are you so concerned with his review anyway?

Post by Bucketdeth (712 posts) See mini bio
Rating 0 |

Loading...

Well this is Jeff`s decision, he enjoyed MK alot more, it`s *HIS* opinion, not yours or mine, his. He may have said some odd points, maybe they seem biased, but this isn`t a review to end all reviews, hell there are hundreds of reviews I don`t like, this not being on of them, but the point is, a review is just an opinion to help you buy and or not buy a game, go buy Soul Caliber if you like it and support it. I still think it`s 100% fine that you made this topic,  I`m just saying a review isn`t something to be taken really seriously.

Well this is Jeff`s decision, he enjoyed MK alot more, it`s *HIS* opinion, not yours or mine, his. He may have said some odd points, maybe they seem biased, but this isn`t a review to end all reviews, hell there are hundreds of reviews I don`t like, this not being on of them, but the point is, a review is just an opinion to help you buy and or not buy a game, go buy Soul Caliber if you like it and support it. I still think it`s 100% fine that you made this topic,  I`m just saying a review isn`t something to be taken really seriously.

Post by funkpanda (5 posts) See mini bio
Rating 1 |

Loading...

Pepsiman said:

"
What exactly gives you more authority to deem which game is better than Jeff does? Because as far as I can tell, you and he are both people and neither of you are the omnipotent god of the opinion on this matter.
"
Look,

The point I'm making is not which game is better. I like both games and play both games. I feel SC4 was judged too harshly.

Based on an objective point to point match between both games, one was judged negatively based on what Jeff saw(SC4) and one hardly had any mention, even though SC4 had more options and can be said to have deeper options.

 You would think if you read one review and the reviewer pays attention to detail of Single player modes, he would pay attention to single player modes in all other games of that type.


Pepsiman said:
"
What exactly gives you more authority to deem which game is better than Jeff does? Because as far as I can tell, you and he are both people and neither of you are the omnipotent god of the opinion on this matter.
"
Look,

The point I'm making is not which game is better. I like both games and play both games. I feel SC4 was judged too harshly.

Based on an objective point to point match between both games, one was judged negatively based on what Jeff saw(SC4) and one hardly had any mention, even though SC4 had more options and can be said to have deeper options.

 You would think if you read one review and the reviewer pays attention to detail of Single player modes, he would pay attention to single player modes in all other games of that type.


Post by Jeff (200 posts) See mini bio
Rating 32 |

Loading...

funkpanda said:

Because you obviously can't judge each one fairly.

You're certainly welcome to your opinion. And if you think that Soul C