Gearbox Software has repeatedly made the point Brothers in Arms is different than every war game because of how seriously it takes the source material. Each game in the series is meant to tell a true-to-life story of events during World War II. Brothers in Arms: Furious 4, a potent mixture of Left 4 Dead and Borderlands, looks ripped from Quentin Tarantino's Inglorious Bastards.
When I checked out a demo of Brothers in Arms: Furious 4 this morning, the developers made it clear this did not mark the end of what had come before. Rather, this was a "test bed" for a new take on the series. The story of staff sergeant Matthew Baker isn't over, Gearbox revealed.
When we might see the next "serious" Brothers in Arms entry, however, isn't clear. Brothers in Arms: Furious 4 is scheduled for some in 2012.



















Gearbox keep working on Borderlands 2 and don't drag the name of your old IPs through the dirt.
The feeling I get is less Inglorious Bastards and more this is the game they would've made if Borderlands had failed so they made a spiritual successor out of one of their other IP's... except Borderlands didn't fail.
God I'm so sick of the term IP. Can we stop using that? We the ones playing the games, not selling them.
It's "Inglorious Basterds" Giant Bomb, come on.
Actually it's "Inglourious Basterds" ;)
No, it shouldn't because that would be fucking awful
Awesome first post. Care to notice the sarcasm? It was just a reference to Inglourious Basterds (because of the obvious similarities) and how the Basterds always scalped the Nazis they killed.
Looking forward to "Furious 4: What really happened".
Everyone's already hated on the name so I'll comment for it. Brothers in arms is a well established IP that WILL sell. Even though they made the wrong move they chose financial probability over past beliefs.
He was probably just calling you on your bad joke. No big deal.