Unfortunately, he's revealed little else other than a reaffirmation that things still don't look too good for the people living in the world of Resistance. There's aliens all over place, lots of of bloom, and apparently bone and leather necklaces are still in.
See? Things don't look so good for our survivors.
Insomniac joked about Resistance 3 being one of the worst kept secrets ever as it officially announced the title at Gamescom in Cologne. Ironically, the studio has managed to keep the details about the game locked down so tight that I'm almost afraid to call it an FPS--and that's after watching the live-action trailer. I find these images haven't really helped me understand more, but these also haven't been released via an official channel which would normally provide some context (if these are, in fact, real).
I can say with confidence, at least, that these shots look pretty. Have a look:
Hey, you've changed, man.
I'm trying to figure out if that's a cellphone or a mine in his hand.
This is where I'd usually make a joke about a monster resembling your mother.
Here's the rest of the screenshots:
And the concept art.
If that's your bag, and you enjoy seeing it over and over, then right on to you, brother. Me? They can fuck off right to Hell.
Yes, for Resistance fans, this is cool. It's been a while since Resistance 2. Hopefully the single player in this one will be better than in the second (it's kind of sad when the PSP side game is more fun).
What are you talking about? Co-op sucked in the last game. It was the most lifeless, boring, empty co-op experience I've ever seen. The first game let you play through the story with 2 people. That was cool, because you were still getting the action. There was no real action, no real tension, no real story, and no real reason to play. My friend and I spent 5 minutes standing around before we decided never to try it again.
I'll be honest, the real reason I hate R2, though, is because of the ending. It really pissed me off to see what happened happen, not in the least because it really made no sense in any way whatsoever.
If they retcon or adjust the ending and create a story as quality as the first game, I'll pick it up. Otherwise, this doesn't interest me.
" @TurboMan said:
Now, I never played it so I can't argue either way. However, it seems to me that you shouldn't make such a bold statement about it if you spent 5 minutes standing around not actually playing before quitting to never return to it.
Assuming these are in game shots and not bullshots, the game looks amazing. Definetly a upgrade from 2.
looks good... but resistance 2 looked good in its first screens aswell so Ill wait and see
@Spankmealotus: I exaggerated a little. We spent probably 15 minutes in co-op. We didn't stand around, we actually played. It was boring as hell. There was no life or excitement to it at all. We faced probably 5 enemies, and didn't make it past them. And it was really boring fighting them.
I love story-mode splitscreen, but I'll even tolerate separate co-op missions, when they're done well. Spec ops in MW2 is a good example. There's no story or real point, beyond completing the missions, but the gameplay is exciting, sort of like levels similar to the campaign.
I really don't know how to explain it, and I can't really put my finger on what it was, but I can tell you that R2 co-op was a sucky snorefest.