@SirOptimusPrime said:
@mrfluke: I don't think he has to cover all of his grounds, though. That implies that he's going to be pandering to a reader's opinion by essentially saying "imo" at the end of every one of his sentences. If he starts doing that, then the validity of his opinions goes down the tubes because he wants to play it "safe." He should say what he wants and not worry about the opposing opinion unless he wants to interact with the comment.
That's fine and dandy that the community loves Alex and his articles, but Patrick is not Alex and he shouldn't have to insert a shitty witticism or snarky comment just so people like him more. I don't understand this argument against him having an aggressive opinion, like at all. GiantBomb IS opinions, and especially polarizing ones.
@ThePaleKing said:
A bunch of articles that just regurgitate information from other sources and present in a safe and neutral manner that appeals to the community would be so incredibly mind numbingly boring.
And we had that. And his name was Brad Nicholson, and people gave him shit for not having an opinion and regurgitating information... whereas the community now gives Patrick shit for having aggressive opinions. Something they do not hold against Jeff, Alex, Ryan, or Brad on a daily basis.
note: I'm agreeing with you. Hard to convey via text :D
this is just my perspective, patrick does articles like the sexism one, to foster discussion ( he even says this, if it wasnt so buried in formspring or tumblr id link it and show you),, there was definitely discussion going on there, but a good percentage of those comments were people essentially bitching,
the guns of navarro articles have been getting in my opinion 95% of its audience to take part in sharing their discussion, and there was very little bitching.
im not talking about pandering to readers and putting imo a lot\, im saying to acknowledge the other side of an argument, which was a decent part of the criticism people yell at him for.
and did you read the guns of navarro articles? alex doesnt do none of that of what your saying on those articles, he does it when he puts up a trailer or in a review, but those last 2 guns of navarro pieces were written seriously i thought., and alex was hated on quite a lot, even when patrick came on board, people didnt like alex, go look at the comments on the pax panels he was on, but again, observing the reaction to the guns of navarro articles, people have come around greatly on alex.
Log in to comment