@kadash299 said:
So i attempted to build a budget gaming PC (At $800).. and came up with:
AMD FX 8320 4.0ghz 8 Core processor
MSI Oc/d NVIDIA GTX 760
G.Skill 8GBs DDR-3 1866mhz RAM
Liquid Cooler for CPU (closed loop)
750W- PSU
Basically, I had looked at all the parts individually, and it seemed good to go, but recently i've heard people shit talking the FX series. I haven't put the machine together yet to test it because im still waiting on some shipping, but have i made a mistake? Is that CPU just underpowered?
Thanks duders
There are console wars level of idiocy in hardware as well. For videogames and as long as you aren't a graphics whore or MAXIMUM FRAMES whore you are fine. Go with the cheaper option. There is really no legitimate reason to upgrade a cpu for a few years. You will know when you have a cpu bottleneck. That system is pretty identical to mine with the exception that I have an old intel core i5 2500k. Anyways, system looks rad. My Linux server is basically that spec except the graphics card is a NVidia gt 650
Another edit: Normally what people are ranting about when they talk about AMD versus Intel is how many instructions per watt or how many instructions per clock. AMD at least as far as I know used to fail at getting good IPC, instructions per clock. They also have had some heat management issues. But, the flip side is that they make up for it with aggressive clocking of the chip. That is why you see AMD chips are clocked way higher than intel chips. People think this is a benefit but at this point it is false marketing (people in the 80s-90s were conditioned to think this is better). Don't ever trust clock cycle. Ever ever ever. There are trolls out there that will tell you AMD is better cause their clock rates are higher.
If you would like to know why all this is false it has to do with the shift to multicore systems. Multicore or heterogeneous processors became pretty hot when single core chips were getting to hot. Wait I should stop here.... This is becoming a history lesson. Anyways, whatever. If you're interested let me know.
I guess a suggestion of websites you should look at for reviews. I am partial to www.hardocp.com and www.pcper.com .
A warning about hardocp, it is a very right wing website and the forum reflects that. The actual news stuff when it comes to evaluations is on point though. They have the best benchmarking methodology and everyone else at some point copied them. PCPer is run my Ryan Shrout who does a podcast on Leo Laporte's twit network. I find that website a little cumbersome to navigate. But, they are friends with the hardocp guys and also do very similar style evaluations. It really depends on what writing style you like. Personally, I love hardocp's style of presenting the information. It is unbiased. Here are the facts with a little color commentary. You make up your mind (or if your insane already have and refuse to believe what you see).
Log in to comment