PlayStation 3 Forum

just out of curiosity is there any difference between th likes of a £10 cable and a £70 cable in terms of picture and sound quality, or is it only noticable on like £3000 t.v's??? just im using a cheap £15 one at the moment and i think the picture is excellent on both games and movies

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

grainger said:

"just out of curiosity is there any difference between th likes of a £10 cable and a £70 cable in terms of picture and sound quality, or is it only noticable on like £3000 t.v's??? just im using a cheap £15 one at the moment and i think the picture is excellent on both games and movies
"

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

They are all the same. A $500 cable will work just as good as a $5 one. They all do the same thing. The more expensive ones may (sometimes but very rarely) be a little better than the cheaper ones but it will be almost impossible to notice the difference.

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

so basically the gold makes sweet FA difference haha

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Yes there is a difference. It's hard to notice unless you know what you're looking for, but cables such as monster will never get destroyed physically and will never distort picture. A cheap cable will usually break at the connectors and the wire is much more susceptible to breaking inside the plastic coating.

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

LtColJaxson said:

"LiquidPrince said:

"Yes there is a difference. It's hard to notice unless you know what you're looking for, but cables such as monster will never get destroyed physically and will never distort picture. A cheap cable will usually break at the connectors and the wire is much more susceptible to breaking inside the plastic coating.
"

Yeah.

I used to post that the only difference is durability - but my fingers have grown tired posting about this type of thing.
"

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Buzzer_Beater said:

"I think the more expensive ones are stronger and are less likely to break down. That doesn't mean the cheap ones will break down. You just have to be really really careful.
"

Edited 5 months, 2 weeks ago

You certainly don't need a really expensive cable for HDMI. Since HDMI is a completely digital signal, the cable is either going to work, or it's not. Therefore, a "higher quality" (read: more expensive) cable isn't going to do much of anything for you (save for maybe durability). Get the cheapest HDMI cable you can find, I guarentee it will work fine for you.

It's really surprising how companies can still jack up the costs of cables so much - it's like they've hoodwinked the entire populace and made them think that you can only get good results with a billion-dollar cable. I guess that may have been true in the analog days, but not so much anymore with the transistion to digital..

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

HDMI cables are all the same, the diference is really the brand. Sony HDMI cables are much more expensive than an HDMI of an unknown brand. Monster brand HDMI cables are just more resistant and there might me some extremely minor changes in the image such as the colour but it is almost unnoticable.

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Since the signal is digital, there is no difference since you are basically transmitting 0's and 1's, basic data..If you are going to run the HDMI over a long distance then you might want to get a higher quality cable for that. For any runs under 20 feet, expensive cables are a waste of cash.

What I would like to see is a better connector on the HDMI cable. The current one is flimsy as hell.

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Like people pointed out, there's no difference in cables except durability. A good cable will last forever, and a cheap one wont. Well if you move it a ton.

Posted 5 months, 2 weeks ago