Follow

Pokémon

Franchise »

The Pokémon franchise has spawned numerous titles and spin-offs, spanning several generations of games and has an animated series that spans many seasons.

Best generation of Pokémon?

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#1 Posted by InternetCrab (1502 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago


#2 Edited by InternetCrab (1502 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I know this discussion has been going on for a LOOOONG time, but for me, it is definetly Gen 4.

#3 Posted by crusader8463 (13172 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Anything but the original 151 are second class at best. Some of the first 100 they added past the first 151 are cool, but they got bad real quick.

Online
#4 Posted by Meepasaurus (167 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen 2 was fun as hell when it came out so it's my personal favorite. I skipped Gen 3 and got back into it at Gen 4, though I strongly prefer HG/SS over D/P. Gen 5 is also great with the faster battle speed and good story, though I got bored halfway through White 2 and haven't bothered finishing it yet.

#5 Posted by super2j (1313 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I like the first 2 gens. and i gave it gen2 considering i love me some pokemon gold. i will say Blazekin gets an honourable mention, but even though i am a fire type guy (Cyndaquil!!!), fralligator is a sick pokemon, one of the sickest around.

#6 Posted by Jimbo (9082 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago
#7 Edited by msavo (7360 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Generation 2. They made vast improvements on the core formula, they added Pokemon that were still somewhat clever and creative, you could choose gender, systems like eggs and berries were introduced along with multiple Pokeballs, you got to face 16 Gym leaders and face the main character from the first generation game!! That last fight is still epic in my eyes.

#8 Posted by EquitasInvictus (1739 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

It's all about the Kanto region for me! As great the second generation was, I would never have been into Pokemon if it wasn't for the first 151.

#9 Posted by RecSpec (3125 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

We're talking the actual Pokemon, and not the games right? Generation 1 hands down. Although I love Wooper and Quagsire. 

#10 Posted by Kyreo (4594 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago
#11 Posted by mikey87144 (1067 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen 2. I don't think Pokemon has gotten any better than that game. Going to Johto then being able to go back to Kanto was great but being able to essentially face off against the main character from the first game still remains as one of the coolest things I've ever seen in a game.

#12 Posted by UitDeToekomst (536 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

whichever one it was that fought in WWII.

#13 Posted by MentalDisruption (1401 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Its really hard to pick between Gen 2 and Gen 1. I'll give it to Gen 2 though because Gold/Silver are awesome pokemon games.

#14 Posted by FengShuiGod (1350 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

The original games are great, but gen 2 improved things a lot. Everything has felt pretty meh to me since.

#15 Posted by Jack268 (3386 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Generation 2. It added a lot to the games, and none of it was bad.

#16 Posted by Redbullet685 (5787 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Generation 1 is the only generation that matters.

#17 Posted by Iodine (357 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Strictly in terms of Pokemanz and not gameplay? Hrm......Gen 2 or 3 probably

#18 Posted by Fattony12000 (4415 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

og

#19 Posted by coakroach (2402 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen 2 had Quagsire.

Case closed.

#20 Posted by Apparatus_Unearth (2754 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I got deep into Gen 3.

#21 Posted by Cloudenvy (5770 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

@EquitasInvictus said:

It's all about the Kanto region for me! As great the second generation was, I would never have been into Pokemon if it wasn't for the first 151.

Hell yeah it is!

#22 Posted by Erik (364 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I would have to say generation 2. I got a good 300-400 hours on Silver, the game was so good. And it's one of the few games I actually would call an improvement to the series, the two maps and all.

#23 Posted by Bourbon_Warrior (4524 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Oh man I had all 151 Pokemon on Red\Blue, how many are there now?

#24 Posted by Bigheart711 (1244 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen. 1 had the better Pokemon, but I like Gen. 2 a lot more.

#25 Posted by Trainer_Red (313 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

lol who the fuck said Gen. 5?

That's like the worst gen ever. Even the starters were unlikable.

#26 Edited by EpicSteve (6167 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Fuck any Pokemon past 151!

#27 Posted by cruxking (178 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

OG 150.

#28 Posted by Vexxan (4578 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Up to 2nd generation are the ones I'm most familiar with so I tend to enjoy those games more. HeartGold is one hell of a game.

#29 Posted by Colourful_Hippie (2811 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

@crusader8463 said:

Anything but the original 151 are second class at best. Some of the first 100 they added past the first 151 are cool, but they got bad real quick.

#30 Posted by g6065 (242 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago
#31 Posted by Neurotic (616 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I tend to jokingly say 'original 151 or bust' just cos I know a few people that it really annoys but I do genuinely think the originals are the best. Whether that's through nostalgia goggles or not is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. I've only played up to Generation 3 though, if that matters.

#32 Posted by FunkasaurasRex (581 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Are we supposed to be voting based on the quality of the games or the actual Pokémon?

In terms of actual gameplay Gen 2 was a huge step up from 1 in terms of depth and 5 has seen the most vast improvement since. As for actual Pokemon, I've got a lot of nostalgia for Gen 1 and 2 so they easily win out. Gen 5 has the Pokémon I've liked most since and 4 is easily my least favourite.

#33 Posted by _Chad (934 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen 1 had Charizard and Blastoise. That's a fact.

#34 Posted by JackSukeru (5224 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

Oh man I had all 151 Pokemon on Red\Blue, how many are there now?

649.

Had you asked me this a month or so ago I would have said Gen 2, but after playing Black 2 I can't go back.

#35 Posted by Robot_Sneakers (409 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

I really loved Gen 1 and 2 was good as well, I've played all of them but 5 really sucked me in again. I love the Gen 1 pokemon best but I like the Gen 5 games.

I side with 5.

#36 Posted by buft (3170 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

they go chronologically from best to worse and my reason behind this is that half the fun was discovering the clever pun on the name and as the series progresses the wordplay gets worse and worse. I also liek the character designs in Gen 1, the 3 pokemon you choose from in the red/blue version of the games are by far 3 of the best pokemon designs.

#37 Posted by Morbid_Coffee (948 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Generation 1. Specifically, Bulbasaur would kick the asses of any of the other 648 Pokemon.

#38 Posted by MooseyMcMan (8664 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

So far as I am concerned, there are only 151 Pokemon.

#39 Posted by CH3BURASHKA (4034 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

This poll could very well be a "How old are you?" poll. The older you are, the shittier the new pokemans seem. Gen 1 fo life!

#40 Posted by Turtlebird95 (1377 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

First gen all the way baby. Blastoise and Squirtle <3

#41 Posted by musclerider (554 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

The one with Charizard.

#42 Posted by Trainer_Red (313 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

@EpicSteve said:

Fuck any Pokemon past 151!

Seriously?

What about this little guy?

How can you say FUCK YOU to that>?

#43 Edited by TooWalrus (11971 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

@crusader8463 said:

Anything but the original 151 are second class at best. Some of the first 100 they added past the first 151 are cool, but they got bad real quick.

Indeed. Going through the list of the gold/silver era, I think that most of them were pretty good. A lot of them still seem really cool to me... Oh, I know why.

You know, that may be my favorite generation. I was... 10 years old when gold and silver came out. The year before that though was an awesome experience, going to the local card shop and looking through all of the imported Japanese Pokemon cards and magazines and seeing all of these awesome new Pokemon before they had proper names, and the rumors that were spreading just sounded so crazy and awesome at the time. Some of that stuff has really stuck with me. Something about going back to Red & Blue and somehow falling into the fountain in Sliph Co. from the floor above, using Surf and finding Pikablu (who turned out to be Maril)... Oh man, good times.

#44 Posted by Hector (3214 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Generation one, games and cartoon.

#45 Posted by Jay_Ray (693 posts) - 6 months, 25 days ago

Gen 1 is the only Pokemon game I beat so choose that, plus I'd totally by a remake of that game. Though I think the only thing that could really bring me back is a console version.

#46 Posted by AiurFlux (800 posts) - 6 months, 24 days ago

Gen 1. And it isn't even close. Gen 2 was fine but after that they really went downhill.

One of the new Pokemon in Gen 5 is a fucking ice cream cone. Enough said.

#47 Posted by habster3 (3594 posts) - 6 months, 24 days ago

Gen 4 < Gen 5 < Gen 3 < Gen 1 < Gen 2

Loved the first three generations. The others... well, 5 was cool.

#48 Posted by Nadril (425 posts) - 6 months, 24 days ago

I've only ever played a little bit of Diamond and a little bit of Black other than Red/Blue, so Gen 1 I guess. Diamond and Black were boring so I never got far in them.

Really it was a great series when I was a kid, and I'm sure the new ones are great for kids too, but that's about it. I'd much rather spend my time playing something else.

#49 Posted by SaFt (335 posts) - 6 months, 24 days ago

I would say Gen 2. I haven't bought a Pokemon game since Ruby/Sapphire and i didn't even finish that one. I've only dabbled in some of the newer ones and it's nothing i care to buy, even though i kind of still like them the need to play them just isn't there any more.

#50 Posted by RobotHamster (3969 posts) - 6 months, 24 days ago

Gen 1 or 2, they're the ones I grew up with. But there are some I like from the newer ones.

Please Log In
  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.