Pokemon Ruby, Sapphire, or Emerald

#1 Posted by Nibbz (233 posts) -

So I'm really into Pokemon again. I have LeafGreen, Diamond, and Soul Silver therefore the last one I need to have all the main games (i'm including the reamkes as main games and as substitutes to the originals). I have played Sapphire (then my brother gave it away), and I then got Ruby (and that got stolen), so now I'm open to all 3. Which is the better Gen 3 Pokemon game? Emerald, Sapphire or Ruby?

#2 Posted by TooWalrus (13341 posts) -

Emerald is better, because it's got some cool new things to do once the elite four are down, and you can get both legendary pokemons... but I think I enjoyed my time with Ruby the most. Why? I'm not sure.

#3 Posted by zudthespud (3329 posts) -

I haven't played Emerald, but out of Ruby and Sapphire I'd say Ruby, because Kyogre is so overpowered. I caught it and completed the league straight away, no grinding required. In Ruby you have to work harder to beat the league. However, if you want to play against someone for some reason then Sapphire.

#4 Posted by JJOR64 (19567 posts) -

Emerald.  It has more features that Ruby and Sapphire don't have.

#5 Posted by ZenaxPure (2584 posts) -
@JJOR64 said:
" Emerald.  It has more features that Ruby and Sapphire don't have. "
Yep. Emerald is the best.
#6 Posted by Kbm600 (466 posts) -

All are still wickedly expensive for GBA games last time I checked, just putting that out there. A little ridiculous.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.