Added by Arkthemaniac on Jan. 4, 2009
comment |
friend |
ignore
This post relates to:
Wii
So, yeah. Notice how on my first blog it said (P. 1)? That was there for a reason.
In my first little delve into the Wii's library, I came across something that I haven't realized yet. It came from the arguments that ensued afterwards, which there were plenty. I was looking at the consoles library, wondering how if there's such a mass amount of games for the thing, so many gaming enthusiasts find the library to have no games, or no good games. It was here that I made a startling discovery, which stems from the way we brand games. You have platformers, adventure games, action adventure games, shooting games, puzzle games, sports games, racing games, RPGs, RTS's, Rhythm games, blah blah blah blah. There's a lot of genres out there, some of which I refuse to include in this page. I realzed that the function of these games is not exclusive to each genre, but that there are two groups. Here they are:
| Traditional Games That We Play | A New, Unknown Function |
|---|
| Platformers | Sports |
| Adventure | Puzzle |
| Action Adventure | Racing |
| Shooting | Rhythm |
| RPG's | Party Games |
| RTS (depends on play style) | "Games" |
I give credit to LiquidPrince for helping me forn the second category, albeit against his will and with him completely oblivious. It's when he said that Warioware isn't a game, but a "game", or something. This new, unknown function of games is not at all new, but it has been unknown for a while just because there hasn't been a situation until now that has called for its classification. The best way to prove this new function is through a diagram, made in Microsoft Paint:
Behold, the Middle Game!
This diagram displays the "Middle Game", as I call it. It's very simple, and I'm sure you've all done it. After beating Fallout 3, you may want to take it easy before playing through Gears of War, so you play a little Rock Band to cool off. That is the casual game's purpose to us; as a middle game. The issue is that you generally need fewer middle games than main, or "epic," games, because middle games have more staying power. In fact, a game can be both an "epic" game and a middle game. So, the Wii's problem? It has far too many middle games to count, and most of them suck ass.
That said, there are games in this genre that are worthwhile. Things like WarioWare come to mind, as does Smash Bros. It's not all first party, though. Take a look at Boom Blox for an example. Up until now, though, the vast majority of these titles has been crap. That's changing, as companies like EA and Ubisoft are stepping up their efforts and finally delivering quality games for the casual gamer, and, as such, are giving good middle games for Wii owners to play. This is why people call the Wii a secondary gaming system.
When taken in this light, the Wii's library becomes less of a lost cause and more of a late bloomer, because large companies have never had to invest a lot of time and money into their casual products, their middle games. It's happening now, though, and more news is shed on it every day. EA recently announced a new tennis IP for the Wii that will use Motion+. You know that they're investing a top team to make that happen. Ubisoft, on the other hand, has proven themselves with Shaun White by making it a completely different game specifically for Wii owners. They will continue into 2009 with releases like Tenchu and Red Steel 2, which will also use Motion+. A good game takes 2 years or more to make really good. People expected the Wii to be like the Dreamcast. It wasn't until 2007 that it started to take off that people realized that it had serious profit potential.
2007+2 Years for Development=2009
It's for reasons like that that I say that 2009 will be the year of the Wii. Even if Sony attaches a peripheral that allows you to have sex with your PS3, and eventually gets the title for reigning console that year, the Wii will undoubtedly have had a powerhouse year.
2009 is shaping up to be the year when the Wii becomes what people wanted it to be in the first place. A little late, sure, but I never said it will be the best console ever. I said it's becoming underrated. The Wii is getting 1:1 motion technology, a storage solution, and a mass amount of "epic" games, shown
here. (Warning: This link goes to the Gamespot forums. Gotta love Haziqonfire). Microsoft and Sony don't have much like that. Sure, they will have games released, but in terms of improvement in the games, the console, and everything related, the Wii is going to blow your faces away.
That's about all I can say on the subject as of now. Some other time, I'll talk about some of the things I mentioned in the final paragraphs, as well as Nintendo's online status.
Added by Arkthemaniac on Jan. 1, 2009
comment |
friend |
ignore
This post relates to:
Wii
Many people see broken promises in the Wii. When they were promised 1:1, they got waggle. When they were promised cutting edge, they got Gamecube+. When they were promised full online support, they got friend codes. People see the misstep after misstep on Nintendo's behalf, and they call the Wii "not a console", "a toy" or "a 250 dollar dust collector." Harsh words when spoken by some. I won't even try to deny that the current control system on Wii is more precise than a dual joystick pad, nor will I deny that the Wii's technical prowess is that of a gamecube with better lighting effects. I also won't deny that the online system on the Wii needs an overhaul. However, people's hate for the system may leave it as not only the most underrated console of the generation, but the most underrated console ever.
Now, after you start typing your hateful comments calling me a "stupid moron" . . . pause22, I see you there . . . hear me out.
The Wii was meant to be a revolution. It was called the Revolution. Was it? Well, a year in, people said that it not only wasn't a revolution, but it was a massive step back for games. With waggle lacking the exacting response of a button-press, and the IR cursor's tendency to jump about unless you are of appropriate distance being less relative than the joystick, it was easy to see why. Games like Smash Bros. and Mario Kart ended up being easier with a joypad to most of us, which we all saw is counterintuitive to the concept of a motion controller, which was making it easier to play. When you add on the relentless assault of subpar party games, including Carnival Games, Game Party and the dreaded barrage of Ubisoft shovelware, some of which were selling damn well, while other, more original games such as Zack and Wiki: Quest for Barbaros's Treasure were floundering on the sales boards, it's easy to see how the longtime gamer, the gaming enthusiast, the educated gamer, would be angry at the consumers of the Wii. It was ruining it for the good developers and the gamers who had followed the gaming world since they had to blow into the systems to get it to run a game, a game that they played with no joysticks.
The gaming enthusiast looked at the "revolution" as a "clusterfuck" of "epic" "proportions." What they didn't see was that the revolution was underground. It was invisible, creeping up on us. Until now, that is.
When you think of the standout games on the Xbox 360 or PS3, what do you think of? Well, on the 360, I think of games like Halo, Gears of War, Too Human, BWAHAHAHAHAHA . . . sorry, couldn't resist . . . Mass Effect, etc. On the PS3, I'd think of Uncharted, MGS4, Resistance, LittleBigPlanet. Notice something about those? Of all those games, only one isn't trying in some way to create a realistic vision of a world. By that, I mean all but LittleBigPlanet are keeping themselves more grounded in reality than fantasy. I mean, sorry to go back to a joke, but Too Human toom the world of Norse Mythology and made it into some kind of corporation! Of course, not all the games for the systems go for that, but most do, and almost all the notable ones do. The Wii? I think of Galaxy, Brawl, Metroid Prime 3, No More Heroes, de Blob, Zack and Wiki. Now, of those you have three that involve humans, and one that recreates them in a realistic manner, being Metroid Prime 3. Galaxy and Brawl are both much more focused on a cartoon-like element, but we should exclude those because they were already established. Of the three most notable titles that have made their full debut on Wii, one has humans, one has blobs, and one has animals that talk like humans. Even No More Heroes, which has humans, is so outrageously over the top that it can barely be called "grounded in reality."
What am I getting at? It's simple; the Wii is not a competitor for the Xbox or the PS3. It is in a whole new league. Games on the HD consoles are considered fresh if they have crisper graphics. Look at Halo 3. It changed very little, but people played the shit out of it. Why? It looked nicer. I can't think of another reason. The Wii, or more specifically, the Wii in 2008, has proven itself to be about something different. Gone is the familiar. What we are stuck with is the visually radical, the aesthetically fresh. I don't even need to explain how important this game is to my argument. Also, have you noticed how the 360 and PS3 are referred to as the "HD consoles" much more than they are the "Traditional pad consoles"? It may be quicker, but there's something else to it.
Visually, the Wii has refused the confines presented by the modern tech spec races, and has created some of the most aesthetically unique games of the generation.
That's all I can say for now. I'll talk more of my mind later.
Added by Arkthemaniac on Dec. 22, 2008
comment |
friend |
ignore
This post relates to:
What's the worst game you played in 2008?
Should have been called TOO MUCH SHIT FOR ONE DVD.
Added by Arkthemaniac on Dec. 19, 2008
comment |
friend |
ignore
I start this with a video. If you don't watch the entire thing, which I recommend you do because It's awesome, at least start the video around 3:00. It's important.
Talented band, huh? The drummer's name is Peter Erskine, one of the true greats. He's a legend. Also, he was at my school last year, and I had no idea. You see, my school has a very talented band program, but has an especially good jazz program. We've taken awards from places on a state and national scale, I think. I haven't been a part of it until just this year, even though I've wanted to be a part of it my entire high school life. If I had joined last year, I would have been able to meet a legend. I would have been able to meet history. Sadly, I did not. I see this as an incredible missed opportunity. Looking back, I see that I've had many.
The latest I can remember is my exclusion from the band programs in my district at an early age. I've become a dedicated musician, but I feel it may be too late. Of course, I cannot take full responsibility for not joining the band program. My family has never been wealthy, and a cheap brass or woodwind instrument will set you back immeasurably when you look at it from that perspective. My family isn't necessarily about granting favors with those kinds of things, evidenced by me having no money saved for college. I see some of the things that the band students can accomplish, and it amazes me how far they've come. I like to think of myself as a decent musician at the very least, but I know I could have been so much better with more training under my belt.
Music is a good anchor as well, which is something I could have used in my middle school days. I never felt dedicated to anything back then. My schoolwork suffered. I could feel my mind deteriorating. Many people don't acknowledge this as happening to them, but it does. Inability to form rational argument, short attention span. It all started to hit me like a wave around this time. The only thing I dedicated myself to was World of Warcraft, which I regret even more. Of all the time I put into that fucking game, so much of it was completely wasted, if not all of it. I could have been doing schoolwork; I didn't. I could have been making music; I wasn't. I could have been improving myself, my surrounding, and the days of people around me; instead, I was selfish. I was apathetic. I was stupid.
High school has been both a depressing venture as well as a rewarding one. Upon entering, I was a cocky moron who fancied himself superior to the rest due to some undeserved natural intelligence that should have been given to someone that worked harder. I lost friends and the respect of my peers and my teachers for my hotheadedness and cocky behavior in class. I look back on him and hate him. Throughout it all, I've never felt any sort of legitimate companionship with anyone. I've kept myself distant from my friends, from girls, from teachers. In fact, I could go on for a few more pages about my missed opportunities as far as women goes. I choose not to for my own sanity. I take some small amount of pride in the fact that I'm not as I was. At the same time, only I can be held accountable for him. I wish I could forget him, but I never will.
I sometimes feel as though my life has been a missed opportunity. My life has been a collection of failures and disappointments, some larger than others. Despite putting me in a somewhat melancholy mood, I'm glad I've done things like this. Looking back and correcting myself has become my sole strength at this point in my life. Eventually, I can hope that it makes me into a good person. I'm not there yet. I'm still completely flawed, but I can say that I'm better off than I once was. I know that I have to grasp chances as they come, as should all of you. My life has become a lesson to me more than anything. I can only hope to help others with what I have learned from it. Of course, a video game forum may not be the place.
Anyways, always respect those around you, and take a look at yourself from time to time to make sure you are who you feel you should be. If you don't you'll blink and find yourself in a hole. Thanks for reading, boring as it probably was.
Added by Arkthemaniac on Dec. 15, 2008
comment |
friend |
ignore
It just hit me.
Giant Bomb is slowly becoming a site made up of dicks. Now, sure, people on Giant Bomb should be able to make dick-like comments at one another in the spirit of good fun, as well as keeping people in a seat of humility. It wasn't until recently, however, that this process has made us into . . . GIANT DICKS.
I know, I'm scared as well.
You see, many people here have gotten comfortable with the dishing out of the dickness, but they can't take it, much like the large black man in prison. This is unfortunate, because Giant Bomb had such a good start. Over time, you can see the positivity just drain from the attitude of the posters, leaving in its wake pointless, unconstructed bickering. And then there's people that always argue with EVERYTHING. Like me, but that's beside the point. I have the right to do it because I recognize I'm doing it. Bitch, no?
So, in short, I'd ask all of you to follow these guides to a stronger bomb:
- Put people in line when they are acting like a dick.
- Don't put so many people that are acting like dicks in line that you become an arrogant dick yourself.
- CHILL THE FUCK OUT!
- Respect one another's tastes from the beginning of the thread. It seems like it's always 100 posts in, when people don't have anything left to say, after they've completely made the other person feel like shit, that they say: WELL IT IS UR OPINON. Of course it is. Little quicker, fellas.
- Don't be a fanboy. EVER. If you are, you are already part-dick.
- Don't jump on a bandwagon for the sake of fitting in. If you're gonna neg Levio, make sure it's justified (i.e. he's talking about Soulja Boy).
- Don't be a troll. The mods don't like it.
- If you say "First.", prepare to be throttled.
- Always look at the other person's view, if only to tell them how much it sucks. At least you looked.
- Have unconditional respect for Jeff, Brad's voice and Luchadeer. The mods . . . they have to earn it
Follow these rules, and we can help circumvent the dick epidemic, or "epidemdick", if you will, and help make Giant Bomb super totally awesome.
Arkthemaniac has not created any lists yet.