Added by WolfLaser on Aug. 18, 2008
comment |
friend |
ignore
This post relates to:
Fable: The Lost Chapters,
Fable,
Fable II,
Fable II Pub Games
The fact that Fable II Pub Games is getting reviewed by websites is absolutely ridiculous.
Take for instance this statement from
EuroGamer:
"The marriage of XBLA and boxed game is a nice idea, but the Pub Games themselves are lightweight and boring..."
or how about this one from Jolt:"Fable 2 Pub Games is one of the more cynical releases to make it onto Xbox Live Arcade. Comprising three riffs on casino games ripped from the full Fable 2 experience, the one and only selling point of this dull click-fest is to try and earn some loot for your Fable 2 character"
OK, fine, but was anyone expecting this to be a totally awesome casino-sim? No. From day one Peter Molyneux made it clear that these were mini-games made to supplement Fable II, and not standalone games in their own right.
Sure they are not that deep. Sure they cost 800 points on Live (although, anyone who is getting Fable II gets them for free, and really I am not sure why anyone NOT getting Fable II would be interested in these).
Look, I am not here to defend Fable II PG. They are kind of middling in my opinion, but am I glad they came with my pre-order? Yes! We don't need to know that they are worth
2.6/10 points (2.6? How the fuck do you come up with a .6? Are things really that precise? What made the .7 so elusive?). This is something you either know that you want because you are a Fable junkie, had thrown in free with your pre-order, or are likely not paying attention to in the first the place.
Before people flame me as a Fable fanboy - this is not about the relative quality of the games. This is about how ridiculous game journalism can be.
Games like this don't need highly articulated scores. Games like this are a simple matter of yes, or no.
EDIT: And now Giant Bomb has put up a harsh 1 out of 5 review as well. Come on guys, I was just about to say I respected you for abstaining!
Added by WolfLaser on Aug. 1, 2008
comment |
friend |
ignore
This post relates to:
Sabin Rene Figaro,
Edgar Roni Figaro,
Kefka,
Sephiroth,
Cloud Strife,
Final Fantasy IX,
Final Fantasy VII,
Final Fantasy VI,
,
Final Fantasy III
Final Fantasy III for the DS left me cold. While it was a technical marvel, the game's tedious dungeon crawling grew stale very quickly without any kind of meaningful story behind it.
From the outset my hopes were much higher for Final Fantasy IV's DS incarnation, and I have not been disappointed. Final Fantasy IV is a tremendous remake that benefits greatly from its transition to 3D graphics. See for yourself:
FF IV DS's 3D engine allows for dramatic new cutscenes.
Sure that original shot of the Redwings conjures up nostalgic memories of long hours spent in your mom's basement with the SNES, but it would take a special kind of fanboy to say that it is preferable to the opening on the DS.
The thing is, I always thought that FFIV's graphics were kind of a holdover from the NES-era Final Fantasy games. Look at the clouds in that first screen shot. We all know that the SNES was capable of a lot more. I loved FFIV when I first played it on the SNES, but returning to it years later, I was always a little put off by how flat it looked compared to say... Final Fantasy VI.
And that brings me to the real point of this blog. Square has done a terrific job modernizing the look of Final Fantasy IV, but moving forward there are going to some touch decisions that need to be made by the Square Enix art department.
I don't know enough about Final Fantasy V to really comment on it, so I will skip that iteration of the series for now and move directly to FFVI. Unlike Final Fantasy IV, I always thought that Final Fantasy VI looked gorgeous. No matter how many times I played through it I always found the larger sprite based characters both emotive and entertaining. The game's backgrounds were equally lush.
Take a look at the two games side-by-side:
Final Fantasy VI featured larger more detailed sprites with better animation.
What really made FFVI's sprites so memorable though was their terrific animations. I can still see Edgar's cocky finger-waggle, Kefka's belly-laugh, and Sabin's shocked-face clearly in my mind years later. These are iconic sprites and animations that are going to be hard to translate into 3D.
So should the inevitable FFVI DS forgo 3D for enhanced 2D graphics. Definitely not. I am confident in Square Enix after their tremendous work on FFIV DS and that they can find a way to translate FFVI's more detailed characters into their 3D DS engine, but it is going to be tricky work. The engine already experiences some serious slowdown when a large number of magic effects are occurring in FFIV. It seems that without further refinement to the code, Square's DS engine has reached its graphical peak.
While translating FFVI to 3D will be a challenge, things might be easier with the PS1 generation Final Fantasy games.
One interesting point though is that the DS engine used to power FFIV seems to have already surpassed the original FFVII-engine used on the PS1. Now, I know everyone is drooling over a "true" remake of FFVII for the PS3 (although a 360 version seems just as likely now), but imagine being able to take FFVII with you anywhere? As long as they convert all the CGI into in-engine cut scenes it seems totally feasible. The PS1 generation games used entirely pre-rendered backgrounds that the DS would easily be able to handle. It might even be possible (although probably not preferable) to translate the games into full 3D.
Better still, imagine Final Fantasy IX on the DS ::drool::
OK, maybe only like a dozen other people are with me on that one, but I still maintain it was the best in the series ;)
In any case, Square has done some fine work with their DS ports so far. Final Fantasy III may have been a shallow technical wonder, but Final Fantasy IV stands as a world class remake. Here's hoping they continue to port their catalogue over.
WolfLaser has not created any lists yet.
Guides
