@assinass: One Youtube video made by a third party isn't enough to simply turn around opinions, nor is it necessarily accurate in its own right.
I don't understand, what would a second or first party do? Wouldn't that be more biased and not as accurate as they're chums of Fish's, therefore convincing you of whatever point even less? The video isn't meant to convince you otherwise on what your opinion on Phil Fish is, it's meant to give a background of how all this media circus happened and how we project all sorts of perspectives on what kind of person Fish is, as we don't know him intimately so he's more of a symbol. Not everyone can handle that kind of attention, and he's now another statistic. He didn't come to you directly, the media brought you to him.