@Branthog:
I wasn't trying to be serious, but yes there is reasoning. 1) I strictly play SP. I do not do multi player, and up to now, the Battlefield games as opposed to The Bad company efforts, were MP. I do own the 2 Bad companies, played a tenth of one SP and none of the other, steam of course. 2) this is billed as a realistic effort. I do not know if I am into that....I won't pontificate, I just have a personal view about it. Now the irony and the hypocrisy. I vowed never to play a war kill game at all long ago, then full in true luv with COD one and Two. I also enjoyed the hyper,over the top roller-coaster madness of Modern warfare. But I never played MP in these games, all for the story, sometimes great, sometimes wtf. But except for the distinction of bearing a military weapon, a bit beyond real. the pull was the over the top intensity after all, where you could not hear yourself for all the small arms and bullets wizzing by, and your squad leader is telling you you stay put though it is certain death. But i won't sell those games here because it's not in any way my intent, and I'm not expecting much this time, and with both games I am in a minority anyways for who and what they are intended for.
Yes, Battlefield has a Sp this time, which some things are being said about. we will see. But I will avoid it for the same personal reason I avoided that other, what was it, Medal of Honor game? The one clearly in Afghanistan or such? Though I do have a dirty secret about all this, I played and enjoyed Vietcong. I remember that war.....
Enjoy Battlefield 3.
Watch the video I posted. Holy shit. Its fn epic. Your the only person who doesnt know BF3 probably just shot MW2 in the HEAD!!!!!
Log in to comment